Not surprising he denies any and all accusations of sports betting on hockey games. Looking like a messy divorce at the very least.
Notice that he doesn't deny being overseas shtuping his ex while his estranged pregnant wife and daughter are going through something traumatic -- and make no bones about it, it's CLEARLY going to be hard on his daughter. So that kind of makes his "Dad of the Year" comments a bit hollow.
Is it POSSIBLE for a winger to play so bad that it is guaranteed his team will lose? Of course not.
Is it possible for a winger to play so bad that certain bets in hockey become +EV? Sure.
Kane doesn't need to set a chance of a Sharks win to 0% to make a bet against them profitable, he only needs to play bad enough to lower it by a few percent.
Here's a very interesting summary of Kane's performance this year in games where the Sharks lose by 2+ goals. That is obviously a significant number as the standard goal spread is +/- 1.5 goals.
Let me be clear that this is absolutely NOT an assertion that Kane DID throw games, nor any estimate of the probability that he did throw them. This is me only establishing that yes, I believe it *is possible* for a star player to take a night off, so that fading "Sharks +1.5" is now a +EV play. Sharks down by 1 with 2 minutes left and an empty net, guess who's gonna be out there? All it takes is one "oopsie" at the blueline and now they're down by 2.
Again, this is just 'proof of concept', my way of saying it's POSSIBLE for a star player to make a bet against his team +EV with a bad performance.
Know what else is trivial? Be a star offensive player, take a night off, and bet the "Under".