Generally speaking I do want a veteran partner to play with Seider for when he'll be in Detroit full time. But at 35+ with a 7.5+ cap hit for 5 more years? Gosh. I don't know. It's not like they're just going to give him away to anyone.
I think it could be a fine move for Detroit if it's cheap. And I think it will need to be cheap for them. Because if they are going to move Suter's deal, it needs to be to a team he wants to play for and won't retire early - lest get slammed with a massive recapture penalty. You have to think Detroit would be on the short list of teams that he would want to spend his final years and that could actually absorb most of his cost.
What teams are going to be lining up for a 35-year-old with 5 years left in a stagnant cap? And what teams would Suter want to call home at this point in his life?
Same reason Parise only makes sense to the Islanders at this point. These guys need to be motivated to go to that new team. Their contract is a poison pill - but mainly for the Wild. If Suter calls it quits early or can't cut it in a few years, all that risk goes onto them, not Detroit.
Chara was 43 this year and still served a role. I don't think it's crazy that Suter, who looked really strong this year again, is still productive into his late 30s.
Granted it's not my
first choice of moves to make, simply due to the term, but there's a certain logic to it aside from the memes. We need a big minute stabilizer back on that blueline and our options are limited outside of the pipedream UFAs or giving up significant assets.