Around the League Thread | Post Free Agent Frenzy Edition

Status
Not open for further replies.

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
54,022
86,318
Vancouver, BC
Didn't Benning say that he was brought in as a first pairing guy to take the pressure off of Hughes? That should debunk the "he won't have to be a #1 here" talk.

He is absolutely going to get buried in the toughest minutes imaginable. They have literally no other choice.

The notion that 'he doesn't have the same expectations here' is totally backward. He'd been pushed back down the lineup in Arizona and was being asked to be a #3 defender. He's going to be asked to be the saviour *here* on a team with one of the weakest bluelines in the NHL, nobody who can take hard-leverage minutes, and a black hole defensively on the left side.

Big difference is he actually wants to be here not like Arizona..... I dont think he will be as bad as all your doom and gloomers think he will be. He was still on pace for a 40 point season on a very defensively minded Arizona team. But most importantly he shelters Hughes and Rathbone from getting eaten alive by every other teams top line. If last year taught us anything its that Hughes cant handle the big minutes and defensive responsibilities.

He was on pace for a 40-point season because he got some of the biggest PP minutes in the NHL. He won't get those minutes here on a team with Hughes. He scored at a 17-point pace at ES which is worse than Hamonic and Benn did for us last year.

The whole point is that he doesn't protect from sheltering because he himself requires sheltering. At this point he's a defensively weak #4-5 you want to spot in offensive situations and keep away from high leverage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bossram

Melvin

21/12/05
Sep 29, 2017
15,198
28,055
Montreal, QC
He is absolutely going to get buried in the toughest minutes imaginable. They have literally no other choice.

The notion that 'he doesn't have the same expectations here' is totally backward. He'd been pushed back down the lineup in Arizona and was being asked to be a #3 defender. He's going to be asked to be the saviour *here* on a team with one of the weakest bluelines in the NHL, nobody who can take hard-leverage minutes, and a black hole defensively on the left side.



He was on pace for a 40-point season because he got some of the biggest PP minutes in the NHL. He won't get those minutes here on a team with Hughes. He scored at a 17-point pace at ES which is worse than Hamonic and Benn did for us last year.

The whole point is that he doesn't protect from sheltering because he himself requires sheltering. At this point he's a defensively weak #4-5 you want to spot in offensive situations and keep away from high leverage.

there’s a chance it’s Poolman who gets buried in tough minutes.
 

Catamarca Livin

Registered User
Jul 29, 2010
4,908
983
The thing is, he wasn't 'asked to be the saviour' in Arizona last year. Or the year before.

Jakob Chychrun is the star #1 guy there and he's been carrying the mail in terms of the biggest ES/SH TOI for the last couple years. Goligoski was the #2.

Arizona was asking OEL to anchor a competent 2nd pairing as their #3 guy, and he got absolutely eviscerated. Right now this is a lazy, soft defensive liability who needs to have a huge turnaround to even be a $3.5 million solid 2nd pairing defender.

He actually has a *worse* supporting cast on the blueline here and will be asked to to *more* than he was doing in Arizona.
He must be the worst defensive dman in the league to need to improve majorly to be a 3.5 million dman. He scored at a 40 pace last year. So offense is not an issue. I will need to see his terrible play as I did not watch a Coyote game last year.
 

VanillaCoke

Registered User
Oct 30, 2013
25,487
11,963
He must be the worst defensive dman in the league to need to improve majorly to be a 3.5 million dman. He scored at a 40 pace last year. So offense is not an issue. I will need to see his terrible play as I did not watch a Coyote game last year.

You haven't watched a Coyotes game in 5 years apparently

But 40 pts!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4Twenty

Pip

Registered User
Feb 2, 2012
69,198
8,537
Granduland
He must be the worst defensive dman in the league to need to improve majorly to be a 3.5 million dman. He scored at a 40 pace last year. So offense is not an issue. I will need to see his terrible play as I did not watch a Coyote game last year.

Are they gonna run OEL on the first powerplay unit? If not, he isn’t a 40 point player
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
54,022
86,318
Vancouver, BC
He must be the worst defensive dman in the league to need to improve majorly to be a 3.5 million dman. He scored at a 40 pace last year. So offense is not an issue. I will need to see his terrible play as I did not watch a Coyote game last year.

For the umpteenth time, he 'scored at a 40 point pace' because he got massive PP minutes he won't get here.

At ES, he scored at a 17-point pace. That's lower than Benn and Hamonic did for us last year.

He was very, very bad last season.
 

Gstank

Registered User
Apr 27, 2015
5,318
2,964
Is there no chance they run a 3-2 with Horvat moved to the 2nd unit?

if anything they shouldnt have Hughes as the only Dman as he basically plays as a forward and it leads to a ton of odd man rushes and breakaways
 

VanillaCoke

Registered User
Oct 30, 2013
25,487
11,963
It is absolutely amazing how many people don't understand this.
I can't agree with you more that ppl dont watch the games anymore apparently.

Just wait for some twitter guy to come up with a graph.
 

Gstank

Registered User
Apr 27, 2015
5,318
2,964
You know what’s super funny about Chychrun is that he was the consensus #1 D in the draft until suddenly he wasn’t and we ended up with Juolevi instead. Good times.

He was over scouted and It took a while for his Offense to appear. I dont get why everyone is so down on Juolevi he hasnt even played a full season and is 2 years behind in his development because of injuries. I think he will come into camp and surprise a bunch of people who have prematurely written him off as a bust. If anything people here value Rathbone way too highly after 8 mean nothing games at the end of the season but have written Juolevi off after 23 NHL games.....

It would be in Rathbones best interest for him to Start off un Utica play 25 mins a night with both PP1 and PK1 time. I have never heard of a prospect who has flopped because of very developed, its always because they are rushed.
 

bossram

Registered User
Sep 25, 2013
15,757
15,305
Victoria
For the umpteenth time, he 'scored at a 40 point pace' because he got massive PP minutes he won't get here.

At ES, he scored at a 17-point pace. That's lower than Benn and Hamonic did for us last year.

He was very, very bad last season.

MS. Give it up. We've made the OEL arguments ad nauseum. By now, everyone must've heard he didn't play high leverage minutes, got crushed in them, and put up some soft PP prodution.

BenningBros don't wanna hear it because they don't live in reality.
 

bossram

Registered User
Sep 25, 2013
15,757
15,305
Victoria
He was over scouted and It took a while for his Offense to appear. I dont get why everyone is so down on Juolevi he hasnt even played a full season and is 2 years behind in his development because of injuries. I think he will come into camp and surprise a bunch of people who have prematurely written him off as a bust. If anything people here value Rathbone way too highly after 8 mean nothing games at the end of the season but have written Juolevi off after 23 NHL games.....

It would be in Rathbones best interest for him to Start off un Utica play 25 mins a night with both PP1 and PK1 time. I have never heard of a prospect who has flopped because of very developed, its always because they are rushed.

Qualitatively, Juolevi does not have the skating ability to really have the potential to be a top-four defenseman. He doesn't really have the physicality piece, and his skating limits his stop/starts and check attachment in the defensive zone.

I'm not discounting that he'll improve (I think he will), but it would take a lot more improvement to become something resembling an impact player. Rathbone clearly has more projectable tools.
 

Melvin

21/12/05
Sep 29, 2017
15,198
28,055
Montreal, QC
Qualitatively, Juolevi does not have the skating ability to really have the potential to be a top-four defenseman. He doesn't really have the physicality piece, and his skating limits his stop/starts and check attachment in the defensive zone.

I'm not discounting that he'll improve (I think he will), but it would take a lot more improvement to become something resembling an impact player. Rathbone clearly has more projectable tools.

Juolevi should have been traded 3 years ago.
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
54,022
86,318
Vancouver, BC
Qualitatively, Juolevi does not have the skating ability to really have the potential to be a top-four defenseman. He doesn't really have the physicality piece, and his skating limits his stop/starts and check attachment in the defensive zone.

I'm not discounting that he'll improve (I think he will), but it would take a lot more improvement to become something resembling an impact player. Rathbone clearly has more projectable tools.

Right now if Juolevi could turn into Lukas Krajicek that would be a major win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bossram

LickTheEnvelope

Time to Retool... again...
Dec 16, 2008
38,689
5,965
Vancouver
You know what’s super funny about Chychrun is that he was the consensus #1 D in the draft until suddenly he wasn’t and we ended up with Juolevi instead. Good times.

I actually wanted Tkachuk or if the Nucks were going to swing for a d-man for them to take Sergachev.

Juolevi just seemed so meek and his injuries seemed to later prove this.
 

racerjoe

Registered User
Jun 3, 2012
12,224
5,943
Vancouver
I will be honest I thought Joulevi would be a lot better. I was fooled! Having said that I still didn’t have him in my top 10.

side note chychrun fell for me due to injuries.
 

Killer Orcas

Registered User
Jul 2, 2011
7,881
5,977
Abbotsford BC
Are they gonna run OEL on the first powerplay unit? If not, he isn’t a 40 point player

Is there no chance they run a 3-2 with Horvat moved to the 2nd unit?

Does any team run 2 defenders on the PP anymore?

I mean, they might? But if so get ready for a 38-point season from Horvat.

Considering OEL doesn't have a wet noodle shot and that's probably his strongest suit left why not have them both out there on the PP1? Hughes could kinda be a rover and he can cut in and out anyway at will. Having Horvat get less points might be a blessing if we can get him signed long term at a lower rate possibly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad