Because the NHL has made it easy to access these drugs. Have you guys forgotten already the story of Boogaard? Have you heard about Fedoruk? Or hell Jimmy Hayes?
This is a great article, because it highlights the issues the NHL is having with substance abuse (
Addiction & Substance Abuse in the NHL - It's Bigger Than the Game (thehockeywriters.com):
The NHL has been dragging their feet on this for a decade. The leaks here and there paint a totally different picture than what the NHL wants fan to think and the newest issue with Price should be sounding the alarm bells.
Addiction is a two-way road, but if the NHL isn't doing their part to help and clean up the locker rooms and implement stricter policies on drugs than it's a losing battle.
The question the NHL needs to pose to themselves is how did these players get addicted? And how can we help them and the next group?
Do you know the percent of the US population as a whole with a drug or alcohol problem?
-In 2015 the NIH (The National Institutes of Health) had at just under 1 in 10 people for drugs (at some point in their lives).
-A 2017 JAMA (The Journal of the American Medical Association) article/study had 1 in 8 people for alcohol (currently).
Just using those numbers as a baseline: 2 players on every NHL team will have a drug problem at some point. Almost 3 guys on every team have a current alcohol problem. For the entire 50 man roster, it's 5 guys who will have drug problems, and over 6 with current alcohol problems. Now multiply those numbers by 32 now to account for every team. 1600 players total. 160 players will have a drug problem at some point. 200 of them currently have an alcohol problem.
I have no clue on the numbers of current/former players in the NHL with any of these issues. So I can't make any type of comparison to US baseline numbers. Everyone gets hooked on things for different reasons. To blame the NHL for all of it is disingenuous.
I think it's clear that there's a middle ground here, where it's not the NHL's fault that people get addicted to substances, but also where they aren't doing everything in their power to help with it, and may in some ways be contributing to it. For instance, allowing teams to give players prescription drugs is useful most of the time, but incredibly enabling when you've got someone on the team who is addicted to those drugs. And it's not always easy for a team to know who is or is not addicted. Addicts are good at hiding it even from their own families.
The NHL is certainly not to blame for all addiction in the playerbase, but it does appear to have a hand in enabling it from time to time. I'm sure that all the time on the road, the frequently frantic schedule, and the sheer pain from playing with injuries (and being encouraged to by your team) doesn't help.
On the other side of the coin, the NHL can only take so many measures. It is true that an addict who doesn't want help won't get helped. My father was an alcoholic, and he had admitted that it was a problem. Still, multiple trips (both willing and unwilling) through rehab weren't enough to break his addiction. It's a sad truth, but some people can't be saved from their addictions via our current methods of assistance.
My view on it is that the NHL is definitely not doing enough to help, and may be even doing some things that actively hurt addicts in their playerbase. Once they have taken the measures necessary to help these players, though, they shouldn't be blamed for the player failing to break their addiction.