ManwithNoIdentity
Registered User
Arizona has no income tax so it's more like 6plus million a year contract lol.
Might want to check that again
Arizona has no income tax so it's more like 6plus million a year contract lol.
Arizona has no income tax so it's more like 6plus million a year contract lol.
Patrick Kane has 105 pts and is +1The negative about Schmaltz in Chicago is he was soft and doesn't really make the effort in his own zone. Very limited time in Zona and he put up some numbers and yet still managed to be a -8. That comes out to about a -38 for a season. ... Notice the Coyote's record was no better with him than without. They made the playoff push after he got injured.
Great deal for a future #1C.
At that price, you can have two Schmaltz for the price of 1 Auston Matthews! Pretty good.
I am shocked it took this long for a non Leaf thread to become a trashing of a Leaf player. Sounds like someone is jealous that the Leafs have Matthews and your team doesn't.
Such a good post.The one thing he was always good at was entering the zone, he graded out as one of the best entrymen in the league in his tenure in Chicago.
Arizona needs a center who can consistently carry the puck over the blue line.
You got a young guy you traded a former third overall pick for. He looked good for you before he got hurt. He wants to stay in Arizona for the next seven years. Very few players make that sort of commitment to Phoenix. It's under $6M.
I make that deal.
I could have chosen as a currency Price (1,79 Schmaltz for 1 Price) or Kucherov (1,62 Schmaltz for 1 Kucherov), but it was more elegant to use Matthews as a comparable (1,99 Schmaltz for 1 Matthews), also since they are both centers.
Numbers are cruel. Blame them, not me!
Such a good post.
Hoping that if the Yotes don't make the playoffs, they take advantage of their 2% chance at Jack Hughes for the same reason. Hughes is great at gaining the zone with possession. Something the Coyotes have been terrible at for nearly 20 years.
As an aside, do you know of a good resource for zone entry data by team and/or player over time?The one thing he was always good at was entering the zone, he graded out as one of the best entrymen in the league in his tenure in Chicago.
Arizona needs a center who can consistently carry the puck over the blue line.
As an aside, do you know of a good resource for zone entry data by team and/or player over time?
You got a young guy you traded a former third overall pick for. He looked good for you before he got hurt. He wants to stay in Arizona for the next seven years. Very few players make that sort of commitment to Phoenix. It's under $6M.
I make that deal.
As an aside, do you know of a good resource for zone entry data by team and/or player over time?
Arizona has no income tax so it's more like 6plus million a year contract lol.
Such a good post.
Hoping that if the Yotes don't make the playoffs, they take advantage of their 2% chance at Jack Hughes for the same reason. Hughes is great at gaining the zone with possession. Something the Coyotes have been terrible at for nearly 20 years.
The Coyotes traded Strome 3.5 years after drafting him. It was five years for Domi.2 years later what team would you trade him to so he can start producing?
2 years later what team would you trade him to so he can start producing?
The Coyotes traded Strome 3.5 years after drafting him. It was five years for Domi.
So the question really is, which team would we trade him to four years later so he can start producing. The answer is probably Detroit. That seems right to me. He'll be our 4LW for four years, and then the 1C for the Detroit Renaissance for the rest of his career.
The negative about Schmaltz in Chicago is he was soft and doesn't really make the effort in his own zone. Very limited time in Zona and he put up some numbers and yet still managed to be a -8. That comes out to about a -38 for a season. ... Notice the Coyote's record was no better with him than without. They made the playoff push after he got injured.
Keeping in mind that the TEAM record was that way because Arizona had 4 injuries that took out about 40 man games of 4 players in the 17 game stretch. Raanta went out for the year on 27NOV (Schmaltz's first game). Galchenyuk was out for 3 games starting on 08DEC. Hinostroza was out for about 9 or 10 games from 06DEC to 29DEC. Grabner went out on 01DEC and didn't return at any point in time while Schmaltz is healthy.
So, a #1 goalie, a #1 C, a lethal PKer, and a 3rd line wing out for a total of 40 games. Is it worth mentioning that these were the following teams that were played:
MIN/NAS/STL/LA/WSH/SJ/BOS/BUF/NYR/CAR/NYI/MTL/COL/SJ/LA/ANA/LVK
So, the only non-playoff teams faced (as of today's standings) are: LA x2, ANA, MIN, BUF, NYR, and MTL. For Montreal, they are still in the thick of the race, so we'll call them a playoff team. At the time, MIN was good and STL was bad, so call that a wash. 10 of 17 games on the road and 11 of 17 games against playoff teams, counting Montreal in that mix. I would take going 8-9 in a stretch against really good teams and without some key contributors a reasonable line. Much easier to push for the playoffs when the January and February schedule features Edmonton and Vancouver a total of 6 times in 25 games between JAN and FEB.