Odd way to contextualize that, since Babs was on pace for 80-something points this year, and Keefe was on pace for 103(with bad goaltending). Especially when Dubas apparently wanted the switch to happen in the summer, before the Leafs fell behind, but Dubas wasn't allowed to make the move. Dubas says "I told you so".
Trading first round picks acquiring Jake Muzzin and ridding the team of an albatross that he didn't sign in the first place. I'm pretty ok with that.
Spending to the cap is bad if you have bad contracts, of which the Leafs have none.
So dubas signing tavares is credit for dubas just because he was the gm but our results getting worse since dubas taking over are not his fault? Just trying to make sure I understand your position.
After the coaching change, we went on a role for 24 games and won 17 of those games. (Pace of ~116 points)
The following 23 games we returned to normal and won 11 games. We were below .500 for almost half the games keefe coached us for. (Pace ~78 points)
I would bet money that most teams that change coaches tend to do well for a bit before falling back to their old ways.
We were not a 103 point team with keefe.
There was no need to trade a 1st to get rid of 1 year of Marleau. That was such bad asset management that i was astonished when the trade was made.
Before we got muzzin (17-18) we allowed 232 GA. The following season dubas trades for muzzin and somehow we let even more goals in (251). This year we were even worse defensively, allowing 227 in just 70 games.
How is it that dubas can trade a 1st for a dman, something lou never did, and yet we are actively getting worse defensively?
Also, spending to the cap is simply bad. How do you rationalize having no money to sign a decent back up? We wasted so many points this year playing with garbage for back ups.
Seems like none of dubas' moves work out.