2XPRO31
Registered User
- Jul 13, 2007
- 3,107
- 137
We should be looking to get defenders, not forwards.
We are losing at least 2/3 of our top line.. Forwards wouldn't be bad. Not like we can't acquire defense later on
We should be looking to get defenders, not forwards.
Which makes it more obvious that we won't be getting the huge deal previously mentioned.
Yeah I get that. But the "timing" and whatever else is not enough to get us the top 2 top 6 top pick package. That would be like :Well, Boston didn't exactly move Thornton at an opportune time, ~20 games into the season, everybody has pretty much set their rosters, and are likely to wait until the deadline before being eager to make changes.
Moving him at the draft or at the deadline would likely have returned more.
We moved Yashin for a much better return than Thornton garnered. Nash, who had already started regressing in Columbus returned far more than Thornton and is/was a fraction of the player. An aging St.Louis demanded a trade to NYR and got more value than Thornton.
The Thornton trade was by all accounts a strange move; not in so much as wanting to go another direction, but rather in the timing and the accepted return.
A player as good as Heatley is going to get that contract.
I'd say at the time that contract looked like a good deal, He had just put up back to back 50 Goal >100 pts seasons followed by a 41g 82 pts in 71 games (47g 95 pts pace) season. Only Ovechkin and Kovalchuk had scored more goals in that timeframe.
Yeah I get that. But the "timing" and whatever else is not enough to get us the top 2 top 6 top pick package. That would be like :
Oshie shattenkirk 1st
Smith josi 1st
Stepan staal 1st
Gudbransson huberdeau 1st/ prospect
I can't really think of one from the ducks. But it's probably as unrealistic as the other ones.
How can anyone compare the current Spezza situation to Heatley or Thornton? Heatley was in full control of his destination. Thornton was never as good a player as Spezza when he was traded. Who was the last point per game player to be made available in trade? I can't even think of one in the last 10 years. Spezza is the best player to come on the trade market for ages. The return is going to match that.
reading twitter, amazing how many NYR fans think we would take Nash for Spezza.
Sorry, we tried to get him, he snubbed us, he is yours now. You want Spezza? Staal Brassard and a prospect.
How can anyone compare the current Spezza situation to Heatley or Thornton? Heatley was in full control of his destination. Thornton was never as good a player as Spezza when he was traded. Who was the last point per game player to be made available in trade? I can't even think of one in the last 10 years. Spezza is the best player to come on the trade market for ages. The return is going to match that.
Kovalchuk, Hossa, Heatley, St. Louis to name a few
reading twitter, amazing how many NYR fans think we would take Nash for Spezza.
Sorry, we tried to get him, he snubbed us, he is yours now. You want Spezza? Staal Brassard and a prospect.
Seems to follow a general trend of fans wanting to trade a player they no longer value for one they now want. Just counter that we will gladly take Nash for Greening.
Kovalchuk, Hossa, Heatley, St. Louis to name a few
You're right, he was better. 2 seasons before his trade he had a 100+ point season. As the Bruins traded him away he was on pace for 30+ goals, 80+ assists and he finished the season with 96 assists.
Thornton's highest season in assists is higher than Spezza's career year with Heatley and Alfredsson.
Thornton had greats like one hit wonder Cheechoo to feed.
It willprobably be Berglund + Rattie + 1st
I'd probably get them to throw in Jani Hakanpaa too... right handed defenseman and I think the best D they have in their system... 6'6 218, physical and can skate well... hes going to become a wicked defensive defenseman
Kovalchuk: offered $100+ million multiple times by the Thrashers. Deadline deal. Still returned a decent package given that it was a deadline day trade.
Hossa: no one knew he was available. Still traded for a guy who scored 40+ goals before his accident.
Heatley: as mentioned before, in control of his destination.
St. Louis: requested to be traded to New York specifically.
Again, how do any of those compare to the Spezza situation? Two of the players mentioned had NMC and only allowed their team to negotiate a trade to 1 team. Kovalchuk refused to sign a contract extension despite Atlanta's best efforts and it became a game of getting the most they could for him at the deadline. And Hossa was a blindside trade that still ended up paying off.
Kovalchuck is gone from the league... (great trade deadline pickup)
Hossa is NOT a PPG player (was signed and traded without anyone knowing, was NOT made available on the market)
Heatley is NOT a PPG player (and chose the team he went to and therefore was NOT 'available' on the market)
St. Louis is NOT a PPG player (and asked for a trade near the deadline at 38 YEARS OLD)
Better? He had that one 100+ point season and had never scored more than 75 points in a season before the trade. How does that make him better?
Jason Spezza, meanwhile, multiple 80+ and 90+ point seasons, 3 of those seasons including 100+ pt paces. Also a way better goal scorer.
Kovalchuck is gone from the league... (great trade deadline pickup)
Hossa is NOT a PPG player (was signed and traded without anyone knowing, was NOT made available on the market)
Heatley is NOT a PPG player (and chose the team he went to and therefore was NOT 'available' on the market)
St. Louis is NOT a PPG player (and asked for a trade near the deadline at 38 YEARS OLD)
Aside from Kovy, none of those other players are in the same class or situation as 30 year old Spezza being shopped to the highest bidder on the open market. A guy who hasn't demanded a trade, but said that he'd be happy with one if Murray can swing it.
Not only that, but he has a low dollar hit, and gives the trading team the flexibility to sign him to fit their team financial structure rather than taking on a bad contract, or long term one, or both. They can also ship him off at the deadline if he won't sign an extension, to get back most, if not all of the assets they gave up for him.
This is a perfect signing scenario for a team, and not a trade detraction as people like to think.
He will be the clear #1 centre or a #1b on whichever team that trades for him. There hasn't been a player of this calibre available on the open market, with no negative trade demand, no character issues, no NTC, and no terrible long term contract to take away from his value, in a long time. Just a star centre looking for a fresh start and chance to play for the cup.
Whats not to like? We're gonna get a nice haul back, that's my take.