Hawkaholic
Registered User
I get to see Boqvist live tonight. Pretty excited to see him. I'll try to take some video of him if I can.
Thanks for the report!Got to see him play last night, and I was a little underwhelmed for the most part. The skill is obvious whenever he has the puck, but still a lot to learn defensively.
Two plays where a guy came down 1 on 1 with him and he backed too far in instead of stepping up on the guy earlier to prevent good scoring chances. Serron Noel walked him pretty good on one of those one on ones and ended up hitting the post.
IMO, Boqvist is not using his skating enough. I don't know if he has been told not to skate the puck up, but he barely skated with the puck at all. I also found that the Knights forwards didn't use their Dmen enough in the offensive zone, until later in the game when they were trying to come back. (coincidentally he had an assist when they did involve the D a little more)
Both of those things make me think that's why he is not putting up the points. I'm also not sure if he is giving it his all. He just seems so nonchalant out there, not much urgency to his game. I guess I expected to see him dominate and look like he was easily the best player or close to it, but that was not the case.
I have a couple videos that I'll try to upload on Monday.
You're nitpicking. He's 18 and was playing in the SJL.Actually Boqvist had 3 assist today according to the official ohl website....another website dedicated to reporting scores from various hockey leagues ...flasscore ...on their link to ohl scores today failed to show Boqvist getting an assist on a goal by Moskul ...But I thought when I watched the okay that Boqvist started the play and only another London player and Moskul touched it after that so there should be an assist for Boqvist and that is what was shown on the official ohl website.
OK. ..you say..great game for Boqvist;right...well 3a is better than nothing. .and the fact that he also could have had 2 more assists from perfect set-ups on pps that were not converted ...well you would say he had a great game...EXCEPT he really did not dominate the ice possessing the puck that nobody could take away from him ...and EXCEPT that he looked again like someone you cannot trust in the d-zone ...His assistant were 1 of the crooner start a pass then others did something that beat drfenderscto scorexa go. ..1 assist was on a shot from the point. ..goalie leaves rebound..it gets poke.d in...Yes hive Boqvist credit for a shot on the net target so I guess that was a normal assist done by manyDmen who get shots on net causing rebounds.. But it was a routine expected point shot..not some "great"play he made to avoid drfenderscto get off the shot in the first place
..nothing really special ...maybe a goalie von his fame would have not let a rebound on it.
The 3rd asist however was not rourine. ..from his end line ,Boqvist makes a long 59 foot pass right up the middle to a streaking McMichael right on the tape ..McMichael enters with the puck into thebo-zone then plays give and go with Guskov who then dishes back an
back to McMichael and he depicts it in the net..So that assist by Boqvist made that play possible. .it was a great long bomb outlet pass...
But dispute these. 3 assists of which only 1 was of a special nature and 2 set ups earlyier in the game on the pp that were also nice set-ups...the rest of his shifts were not especially noticeable except for several less that trustworthy effort
Tscin the d-zone ..He does not look in command of much in the
He d-zone and is a long long way from NHL ready calibre for any coach to trust him in the d-zone when trying to defend ...wandering gs out of position..weak stick-check type defending...coverage errors. .just a lack of hockey sense for how to defend your zone properly .. RAW is the term I would use. .he needs a lot..a lot more development to improve in this aspect. Also Focus not quite there. ..I will give 2 examples of this flaw of lack of focus:
There was a n attempted zone clear by Boqvist ..he skates puck out past checker the wants to shoot it down the ice to allow for a change do he can get off to the bech ...but he makes a horrible weak clear after he skatedcitbout just past his blue line ..so puck gets intercepted 10 feet away before it got pastccentrevice and Kirchner brings it right back into the Lindon zone as a result. ..In consequence ,the puck is kept in the London zone for over a minute of buzzing around as tired Lindon players including Boqvist just cannot do anything g the
O get bit back as their energy. Rgy is dog-tired ...Boqvist could have cost his team a goal had Kitchener scored putting on that pressure. .but theboiintbusvitcwas a very poor clear by Boqvist after making a goidbpkayvto skate it out in the first place. ..he just lost focus and made a poor weak clear when it should have been a stronger arm movement to push the puck a lot further down n the ice to enable time for a shift change. I call this a gaffe which does not earn coaches trust .He cannot be do careless/non-chalant with the puck ..clear attempts must be a lot crisper in detail and execution .
Another gaffe came with just a few minutes remaining in the game ...London had big lead but still Boqvist loses focus when trying to exit the zone ...coughs up the bock. ..Kitchener player grabs loose puck and goes in all alone to the London net..did not finish his chance ..but again sloppy play by Boqvist not focusing ..and could have again cost hid team a goal. .
On balance ...he did done good things and some very bad things. .hardly would call it a great game for him...despite the 3a. ..
To be "great"...you need all of production + fiery compete + competence in your checking and defending responsibilities..
Boqvist still gas a long way to go to achieve all of these to firm an NHL ready player who can be trusted by his coach.
Hope you don't think that I think he is a bust just because of my report.Two helpers today. A bust.
Hope you don't think that I think he is a bust just because of my report.
Hope you don't think that I think he is a bust just because of my report.
HF50, this is getting tiringBoqvist has 2 secondary assists so far today as London leads Sania 3-2 with a bit over 6 minutes remaining in the 2nd period as I type this...Saris has a 28 -25 shot advantage so far..so it has not been very impressive for London despite their lead...The assists Boqvist has are secondaries and nothing exceptional ...
Could’ve used him the previous two seasons. Now, I’m like meh..whatever.He's not gonna sign with the Hawks until the 2020/21 season. Quite the wait for Shalunov haha.
6 points in his first 3 USHL games at least.I guess Hakkarainen will be in Rockford next year. He dropped out of college and he won't be eligible to play in the USHL next year. Not sure where else he'd go unless we went back to Finland.