Chimpradamus
Registered User
"Silly argument season after season." Yeah, maybe you can see that as a coincidence, game after game. It's pretty obvious the team is given orders by the coach to get the puck deep, keep 30 second shifts and... yeah, that's what gets you in turtle mode for periods of time, because whenever you get the puck back, it's time for a line change, ordered by the coach.Code:
I can't believe I continue to see this silly argument season after season. Do you really think the strategy was to turtle in the third? Or maybe, just maybe, a massive push from a beyond desperate team was the reason Montreal carried play. Sometimes it's the other teams oerformance ya know.
But to push a narrative that the Rangers are being told not to play offense is really really dumb. And it gets pushed every time the Rangers get out played. Hockey, especially playoff hockey, is a game of momentum and more often times than not the momentum swings to the more desperate team. I cannot believe there's people who have watched hockey for years and still believe some half-baked thought that the Rangers are willingly shooting themselves in the foot
How about pushing back once and then? How about even trying to score once and then? How about even trying to counterattack on the rush, which has been the main implement of scoring as a strategy since AV entered as a coach? Nope. Nope! So yes, maybe I'm a little to hard on the guy considering his team threw a ton of hits and were gassed. Just maybe they should've paced themselves so they could manage to play at least 60 minutes of hockey then and not 40.
How can it be a mystery NYR sees it as an achievement to lift the puck out in the offensive zone for a line change, instead of an icing whenever the team has a lead coming into the last period? It isn't and it's ****ing idiotic coaching. How were you winning the game in the first place? Let's stop doing that, yeah, what a great strategy! Let the team strategy BASED ON COUNTERATTACK turtle for 20 minutes and hope one goal is enough. It makes me barf watching that idiot behind the bench.
What happened after MTL drew the game? NYR was pushed back, because AV allowed the momentum to be 100% MTL and that's how this guy has coached every game of his career. How much success does this strategy have? But you can keep defending the "I don't want to lose more than I want to win" strategy how much you want.
Like that would stop AV from his convictions how to win a hockey game, even though he has zero proof it works. Especially considering how ****ing awful he is at picking his personel for the job.
If AV is considered one of the best coaches, it's pretty clear it's the management side that is decades behind every other aspect of NHL and hockey today, because they get the job based on reputation, not on competence. It's a closed circle of incompetence trying to coach an elite hockey team. It's exactly like the CEO circus. Once you're in, you're in. So who's the next clown who is going to coach NYR after AV? Some idiot with obsolete coaching strategies and irrelevant ideas of what signifies a good hockey player? I cannot wait to see what clown that'll be.
How about getting an actual coach with actual intelligence, actual adaptation and who knows what he's doing in the present? Unheard of, except for a very select few that the business barely even know who they are. Why? Because they're a business establishment and not actual sports fanatics and hence, they have no idea what they're looking for.
So the NHL gets a rotation of clowns who coach the teams and manage the teams and it sickens me.
TL;DR: AV has one advantage to his opponents, his forward depth. And he effectively neuters them with his strategy whenever the team has a lead. **** him, he's useless as a coach. AV as a coach could be exchanged with a script bot and it would be way cheaper.
Last edited: