Next year's draft bud
Getting a little ahead . So why would we be offer sheeting someone at 6M when we have any of UV,Zboril,Lauzon and Sherman at a cost controlled salary to fill that same spot?
Next year's draft bud
Getting a little ahead . So why would we be offer sheeting someone at 6M when we have any of UV,Zboril,Lauzon and Sherman at a cost controlled salary to fill that same spot?
You're not getting it.
Offer sheet can only happen after the draft.
So it uses next year's draft picks.
Ok, but still, same question.
Because Nurse has a very good chance of being a top pairing D, none of those you listed do, because he is further along in his development than anyone you list and because "cost controlled" doesn't win cups, it wins lottery picks. Also they have the cap space to make an offer and Chiarelli will probably panic and make a deal for Bjork and one if the D's you list instead of picks.Getting a little ahead . So why would we be offer sheeting someone at 6M when we have any of UV,Zboril,Lauzon and Sherman at a cost controlled salary to fill that same spot?
Nurse is further along and better than any of our D prospects. And his ceiling is higher. That's why you make that move.
Because Nurse has a very good chance of being a top pairing D, none of those you listed do, because he is further along in his development than anyone you list and because "cost controlled" doesn't win cups, it wins lottery picks. Also they have the cap space to make an offer and Chiarelli will probably panic and make a deal for Bjork and one if the D's you list instead of picks.
How is his ceiling higher than any of those guys? You make that move and we have a problem signing the kids who are due for a raise.
Which kids?
Because Nurse has a very good chance of being a top pairing D, none of those you listed do, because he is further along in his development than anyone you list and because "cost controlled" doesn't win cups, it wins lottery picks. Also they have the cap space to make an offer and Chiarelli will probably panic and make a deal for Bjork and one if the D's you list instead of picks.
It's a damm shame that spot doesn't have a good C prospect.
Where are these Krug trade proposals coming from, just fans wishing or are there real rumours?
Yep.
The team should be focused on competing now, but it could be done with future in mind as well.
Chiarelli thought me to respect healthy prospect pool/u25 core.
DeHaan+7ov Hanifin vs Krug.
I think Carolina wants to get better right away and is not looking to deal too many players for futures, and would prefer Faulk out.
Because Nurse has a very good chance of being a top pairing D, none of those you listed do, because he is further along in his development than anyone you list and because "cost controlled" doesn't win cups, it wins lottery picks. Also they have the cap space to make an offer and Chiarelli will probably panic and make a deal for Bjork and one if the D's you list instead of picks.
Chia taught you to respect a healthy prospect pool?
Was that right after he gave lessons on overpayment, excessive term, and NMC’s?
I shouldn't have to list the number of young players on the Bruins roster that are due for a raise over the next 1-2 years.
Carlson is looking at definitely $7 million per maybe even $8 million per over 7 years. No thank you.How much is John Carlson going to demand on the open market?
I think we all know one of our biggest needs is to add size in our top 4 d. The grand slam would be to find a big young LH D to play with McAvoy this year, but it sounds like it will be super expensive to trade for someone like Hanifin or Nurse. We are pretty stacked at LH D for the future and I think Chara can man that top spot next to McAvoy for another year. I do think Vaak and Zboril will seriously compete for spots this year. McAvoy and Carlo are great RH D for us but after that it is slim pickings for the future. What about trading Krug for a high pick and McQuad for a mid pick and then signing Carlson for free and have Vaak and Zboril compete for the spot next to him.
Roll with something like this....
2018
Chara-McAvoy
Vaakanainen-Carlson
Grzelcyk-Carlo
Miller
2019
Vaakanainen-McAvoy
Zboril-Carlson
Grzelcyk-Carlo
Lauzon
In: Carlson, Vaak, 1st and 3rd
Out: Krug and McQuaid
Salaries should add up to about the same. We add size and maybe even a little more offense as well as some quality picks.
for whatever it's worth (absolutely nothing,), I had a dream the B's traded Gryz for Austin Watson. Not sure it makes sense, but definitely wouldn't mind a guy like Watson in the lineup.
I dont think Nurse, Hanifin, or Kovy are on this team come opening night.
I believe Krug will in fact get traded. I think one of Backes/Krejci gets traded as well.
I think we're going to see a Backes/Lucic/Klefbom type of deal just not sure of all the pieces.
I also wouldn't be surprised to see Rask moved. I dont get the feeling DS likes him, that obviously opens up a major problem for us unless he thinks he can get PG from Washington or that Hutton/Bernier are starters. I personally like Rask, even with his tendencies to allow soft goals in inopportune times, I think he's the best option for the short foreseeable future.
Carlson is looking at definitely $7 million per maybe even $8 million per over 7 years. No thank you.