If there's no significant roster change and the team misses the playoffs I think you can expect above average player turnover, maybe even a rebuild or firesale. A new front office with experience is set. New blood is being pumped into a development system they plan on rejuvenating. If spending to the cap on veteran roster players isn't getting it done 2 years in a row then something has to give, and it probably won't be the shiny new front office.
How will they add a C of consequence without trading Wilson, Mojo, or Kuznetsov?
Most of us will, however there is some promise. Had no changes been made with the GM or coaching, there is no question another idle offseason waste. Lol, I wonder how many will have updates programmed for Tuesday.
Carrick, Bowey, Burakovsky, Vrana, Grubauer, Barber, Schmidt, all hold value. Any 2 (or 3) of those pieces is a lot, slice it any way you want. And of course draft picks. I'd trade next years first for Pavelski. Yup.
1st + Carrick + Burakovsky would net a lot, wouldn't it? Pretty much almost anything, I'd wager. Anything we are talking about.
Only hiccup is if receiving team wanted NHL playing talent now. If so, then MaJo would go, in lieu of say Burakovsky.
If that happens, then ensure you get a young forward back in the Brouwer deal.
I doubt Vrana nets you anything, and the only other pluses besides next years first that holds value (outside of the 3 named) is Bowey and that's not a player I'd gamble away unless you're getting a young top line player/prospect back.
not sure that I agree that this is a veteran roster. right? they were 4th or 5th youngest team in the league last season and to date nothing has changed that. who would you fire sale?
the list of veterans would be pretty small unless you are talking about ovechkin and backstrom too.
chimera and ward could be traded, but beyond the two big guys the only other forward veteran is laich. on defense its just green unless you fire sale Carlson and Alzner who are players you rebuild around. the goalie is a kid.
this is not an aging team. they need more veterans to improve not less.
Are you seriously nitpicking my saying we just changed management so another failure means moving "veteran roster players"?
If you're spending to the cap and not making the playoffs, and you just changed your whole front office, and you're drafting a lot of young forwards, and you're talking about rejuvenating the development program, and you have maybe 1/4 to 1/3 of the roster tying up a lot of the money in older forwards, what do you think is going to happen?
I'll give you a hint: it isn't dumping the cheap players.
all the McPhee a sleep at the switch, risk averse and so on comments of years past can no longer be hurled. now what? so far it appears little has changed but the names on the press release.
I still think changes are coming but on a different scale and time table than we are hoping for. if ehroff is going to get a big ufa deal, leonsis isn't got to be the guy signing it. particularly if it looks anything like the contract the guy got from buffalo.
Lol. Vrana won't net the Caps anything?
A week ago, would the Caps 13OA netted you nothing? Vrana is so bad that he negates the value from a week ago?
Ok then.
It's like a car, the minute it's off the lot it's value depreciates fast. Vrana doesn't hold the same as the 13th over all because not everyone valued him that high. Suddenly 30 people wanting something could drop to 10 or 15.
Do you not understand that?
Another year like the last one and I sincerely doubt we have a choice about trading 8.
It's like a car, the minute it's off the lot it's value depreciates fast. Vrana doesn't hold the same as the 13th over all because not everyone valued him that high. Suddenly 30 people wanting something could drop to 10 or 15.
Do you not understand that?
That's horse crap. A first round pick, top 15, doesn't devalue like a frickin automobile. Vrana was high teens to low 20's in most boards. You think had the Caps not picked him, he would have fallen out of the first round? He's a first round pick. His value is a first round pick.
Your perception is wrong. I'm guessing you do not understand that.
A team acquiring a 13th overall pick is doing so with the hope of a player they value as top-13, or higher, being available there. While teams would pick different players there, the pick itself has similar value to all teams. If the player they can get is restricted to one, the value is dependent on teams' views of that one player. Some teams may value Vrana as highly as the Capitals, but his consistently below-13 rankings mean that on average his value is decently lower than the 13th pick's. It's kind of incredible that you're disagreeing.
Perhaps you should read the whole thread here. This guy is saying Vrana has no value as a trade chip. I told him that was bunk, and that was what I was disagreeing too. He then compared Vrana to a new car.
Anyway you slice it, Vrana has plenty of value as a trade chip. Are we saying that a guy drafted 25 has no value? Say Vrana went 25th to whomever. He'd be worth nothing then? What are you saying is decently lower? How much lower? "Not worth anything", low?
You guys are funny.
...did I miss the memo where you have to be correct to express your opinion?
Laughed so hard, quote of the year.
Way to aim high.
Would be content with the following:
Ovechkin-Backstrom-Ward
Kuznetsov-Legwand-Brouwer
Chimera-Johansson-Wilson
Fehr-Latta-Brown
(Trade Laich to buffalo)
Or
Laich-Backstrom-Ovechkin
Kuznetsov-Legwand-Brouwer
Chimera-Johansson-Ward
Fehr-Latta-Wilson
Then for the defense:
Alzner-Green
Ehrhoff-Carlson
Orlov-Stralman/Orpik/Weaver
3.5 mil for Legwand
5mil for ehrhoff
~4.5 for Stralman/Orpik...2mil for weaver