The amount of ref apologists in here convoluting the OP's post is annoying.
Essentially it's just asking for an improvement to and accountability of the standard of reffing in the NHL -- which is abysmal. People aren't asking for perfection from referees, so all the "they're human and prone to mistakes" arguments are strawman arguments, as it's consistency people want, not perfection. Similarly, all the "well, then there will be 30 penalties a game" arguments are also way off base, as we saw post-lockout when the rules changed and they cracked down on interference and holding, or when they cracked down on slashing once Gaudreau and Calgary brought it up. Players adjust to rule changes: you don't see goaltenders playing the puck outside the trapezoid anymore do you? And again, "the reffing has always been bad" arguments are useless as that's no excuse not to fix something that needs fixing. That's essentially saying you can't drive because your car is broken and don't care to fix your car.
All people want is for the refs to find a standard and stick to it. If only they had like a book or something full of instructions about how to do their job that they could follow.... Every fan should be in favor of consistent reffing and know what to expect from the officials instead of the distracting, detrimental and whimsical decisions from the referees that has become standard in the NHL. People would complain less if there was a rubric to follow. But reffing -- like goalie interference, like the DoPS decisions -- is a incomprehensible shot in the dark in the NHL and ruins the game.