The Macho King
Back* to Back** World Champion
- Jun 22, 2011
- 48,846
- 29,423
Mainly Varys and Tyrion. And maybe "motivations" isn't the right word. Their arcs just kind of... falter.Agreed about Jaime.
Which ones are confusing?
Mainly Varys and Tyrion. And maybe "motivations" isn't the right word. Their arcs just kind of... falter.Agreed about Jaime.
Which ones are confusing?
Please stop trying to read the tea leaves. There is absolutely nothing to support GRRM tossing aside the Others only to move on to another lesser-stakes conflict in Cersei or MQD. Nothing. In fact, the exact opposite is supported in-book: the conflict with the Others and the pursuit of the throne will inevitably converge. There is certainly evidence to support a MQD turn, but that doesn’t mean it comes at the cost of quite literally every other plotline in the story, as has happened in the show.
We have no idea how GRRM’s books will end. We can surmise very vague plot points from this ****hole season, and that’s about it.
Mainly Varys and Tyrion. And maybe "motivations" isn't the right word. Their arcs just kind of... falter.
Tyrion has been a complete mess for a couple of seasons now. I hope this is just D&D not knowing how to write for him.
Varys seems to be less personally ambitious than Littlefinger, but I get your point.Verys' motivations make no sense because his actual purpose was adapted out and the showrunners ran with the less plausible "serve the realm" concept for him. That makes it logical for him to flip and flop between claimants as he sees fit.
In the books Verys is clearly set up as the equivalent of Littlefinger (except not ruled by emotions), backing a king of his own creation to attain ultimate power from the cloisters. Verys won't be alive by this point in WoW/DoS if they ever get written
That's part of it, but not all of it. Some of it is built for dramatic tension. Robb was followed because he was good at winning battles. Jon's battles are all "set pieces", and therefore very dramatic, and there's not much drama in just winning by planning well, so Jon has to always almost lose. Kit sucks, but honestly the writing hasn't done him any favors in that regard either.Varys' arc would make more sense if Jon was a more credible leader. This is a case where I think an actor performance has let the show down.
I think we're supposed to believe that Varys sees Jon as such a strong leader that he's willing to risk everything to get him there.
That's part of it, but not all of it. Some of it is built for dramatic tension. Robb was followed because he was good at winning battles. Jon's battles are all "set pieces", and therefore very dramatic, and there's not much drama in just winning by planning well, so Jon has to always almost lose. Kit sucks, but honestly the writing hasn't done him any favors in that regard either.
Ned was naive, not stupid. And he was naive because he'd been so far removed from politics and backbiting for 20 years, so his naivety was understandable. Hell - if anything he was killed because he figured shit out too fast and just didn't have the bearings to know what to do with the information.Agreed. He's been written as being pretty dumb and impatient. He's very dismissive of political concerns.
I tend to think of him as being a junior version of Ned, but, Ned demonstrated enough smarts on the other stuff.
I'm really curious now they handle Jon's arc next week, and if we're supposed to believe he's the perfect leader.
I mean - I'm being less generous to him, but I don't even think that him dying was off the table as a possible outcome for Ned, it was just a risk that he would accept. I *do* think Regicide was outside of his predicted outcomes, but everything up to and including that was on the table.I always thought Ned was smarter in the books than in the show. There were subtle things like manning Moat Cailin before all hell broke loose in King's Landing that showed he wasn't just naively charging into KL politics without any safety measures for his people. He knew things might turn ugly and made sure his people (the North) would be ready. There were also the inner dialogues of doubting Robert's nature already during the journey to KL that showed he had some smarts. Even his fatal flaw in trusting LF was reasonable considering Catelyn vouched for him.
The Mad Queen Dany chapters in the books are going to be LIT as **** and an amazing read. Her inner monologue while she does all these things would be quite something.
I wonder if we actually get her POV for the actual sack though. George could do something similar to the show and tell it through other POV characters and check in with Dany after it’s over b
Books aren't coming
House Martin
We can safely assume basically all major characters have the same endings (he said as much).
He also heavily hinted that the end game in ASOIAF is about human conflict, human relations and human heart - meaning that the end game is among humans and their politics and wars.
In the end, what makes ASOIAF such a writing phenomenon was not a greater non-human arch-enemy, but the politics and the betrayals and how GRRM pulls one on the audience who think Ned is your average fantasy hero.
Also, the last book was supposed to be called "A Time for Wolves", before he expanded to seven books.
So, yes, IMO, the end game in the books WILL be the human conflict, Dany going Mad Queen and whatever happens in episode 6.
Of course, it will be written more in depth and will seem a more natural development, but yes - that will be the end game in the books, humans.
This is all speculation until the books come out. We have just as much evidence to support an endgame with the Others, considering the stakes surrounding that conflict.
Personally, I think this will all converge and develop naturally, as you said. George can write a satisfying ending about human conflict without unceremoniously dismissing the largest threat in the story. These things are not mutually exclusive.
Asoiaf is a phenomenon because George writes very believable and interesting characters. Full stop. Politics and intrigue and betrayal alone are nothing unique to Asoiaf.
If a lot of these plot points are what GRRM actually had planned, I wouldn't be surprised if the reception the show has been getting sent his writer's block into overdrive. I know he's said in interviews before that people "discovering" certain plot points or arcs doesn't change the way he writes, but have to wonder when the reception is this poor that it might.
I think George can see that people are livid over the writing of the show and not the overall character arcs