bennysflyers16
Registered User
- Jan 26, 2004
- 84,682
- 62,733
all of them accept the kids.
No kids included other than Oskar
all of them accept the kids.
1. Do you think I was making my comment directly at you?I told you Gordon was far worse than Hakstol. I said it. You know I did. You said, "I don't watch the Phantoms, but if you say so....."
Please don't use this line to prove a dead point.
1. Do you think I was making my comment directly at you?
2. I was making my comment to the anti-Hak brigade in general, which took the stance that Hakstol is the root of all evil and was holding the team back.
3. I repeatedly said I didn't think Hakstol was at the far left of the curve of NHL coaches, despite the anti-Hak brigade's consistent insinuations; and I quoted the lyrics to "Won't Get Fooled Again" and posted the ending scene to The Graduate multiple times to emphasize what I thought was likely to happen if Hak was replaced.
4. Meet the new boss, even worse than the old boss; the fleeting glee of the Hakstol firing quickly faded, didn't it?
Didn’t even list him.
i listed half the team
So to summarize, since I missed the game..We're dog ****?
Yeah, lets look at this claim.
McKenna (temporary emergency goalie because of injuries)
Folin (#7)
Haag (real problem)
Lindblom (young guy with potential, not a problem)
Simmer (real problem, will be traded in a few weeks)
Laughton (4th liner, not a problem)
Raffl (4th liner, not a problem)
Varone (4th liner)
Weise (4th liner)
The bold 5 are the only ones who need to be replaced... the other 4 are perfectly fine and wouldn't hurt the team at all if used properly.
So the "worst constructed roster in the NHL" has problems with bottom 6 forwards, bottom pair defensemen, an emergency waiver claim goalie due to injuries, and a rookie.
If your above claim was true, I'd expect to see core, top 6, top 4 players on there.
What we need to do is to replace these bottom of the lineup guys with youth then fix the coaching staff, and we should be in good shape. You're making the roster seem way worse than it actually is. On top of that, a fresh start and a real coach will do wonders to make the underachieving core players bounce back. We know how good guys like Provorov and Ghost can be... they're just not playing like it right now. Same with the PP. These are temporary problems.
Scoot Gordor: "You can't outscore those 2 mistakes."
It was 3-2. Not 30-2. In the NHL you better be able to outscore a couple mistakes and get more than 2 goals yourself, Scoot.
You’re not being attacked and I’m not even arguing with you. Relax.
All I did was point out that it wasn’t @Tripod who started with the labels.
The fact that you’re this hyper-defensive shows that you know you’re in the wrong.
Thank you for admitting you were wrong. Most don't.
Sure.Fine, but easily replaced with faster more suitable players. We need to break a culture and coaching flaws, get rid of them
I don’t disagree.Hak sucks
Hexy sucks
Coaches suck
Gordon sucks
More than 5 players suck
A lot or people can be right at the same time
I don’t disagree.
I was in favor of replacing Hakstol.
I just said the roster was the bigger problem & it wasn’t going to make the difference a lot of people acted as if it would.
I also said that if the Flyers fired Hak, to expect Gordon to be interim for the rest of the season; that I didn’t know much about him but be careful what you wish for.
Magua did say Gordon was even worse; however, the majority of the anti-Hak mob acted as if ANYONE would be better than the scourge of Hakstol, the biggest moron in NHL hockey.
Well, you’d think their play the last 10 games would indicate there’s bigger problems with this team than coaching; but, no, there are still plenty of posters saying it’s not the players’ fault; the roster is good; & coaching is still the biggest issue.
Maybe they should realize the answer isn’t nearly as simple as they thought, & the roster isn’t nearly as good as they thought.
I agree the coaching needs an overhaul, but it’s also not like Gordon’s minor league record is indicative of complete incompetence.
It’s a bad team.
Nobody ever said or implied that.blasphemy,
any critique of the roster is really some veiled endorsement of Hakstol.
Nobody ever said or implied that.
Good try.
Oh yeah?ok for someone who isn't fighting with me. you seem eager to always back up your buddy.
argue with one, you argue with all I suppose.
Oh yeah?
Which specific person am I backing up there?
I was responding to your blatant lie that people say any player critique is automatically defending Hakstol.