Amorgus
Registered User
So does that mean the Avalanche will never lose at home?What is all of this elevation nonsense? Did one of the trolls come up with that bull****?
So does that mean the Avalanche will never lose at home?What is all of this elevation nonsense? Did one of the trolls come up with that bull****?
Except when they play Calgary. Then it's 50/50.So does that mean the Avalanche will never lose at home?
So I have to imagine that before the new year Hakstok is gone and a trade is made. It has to happen, right? RIGHT?Losers in a Hak Shell
Turtle Power
They literally played more than half of the 3rd period a man short. Of course the opponent is going to dominate possession & shots — it would be the same for every team in the league.
Now, if you want to bash them for being overly passive on the 6-on-5s — absolutely. But for most of the period, you can thank Simmonds & Gost for terrible lack of discipline, & Laughton & Raffl for interference, for forcing the Flyers to have the ice tilted against them.
So does that mean the Avalanche will never lose at home?
Losers in a Hak Shell
Turtle Power
So I hear. Who's at the lowest elevation then? I know Pittsburgh seems like a city carved out of the side of a mountain by Morlocks and every road seems to be at an 80 degree angle but it could just be an illusion of being underground.I wont lie to you, i was in Denver last year for work, and went to a game cause i had the night to myself. Just walking up and down the steps to go get a beer was flipping exhausting.
So I hear. Who's at the lowest elevation then? I know Pittsburgh seems like a city carved out of the side of a mountain by Morlocks and every road seems to be at an 80 degree angle but it could just be an illusion of being underground.
I clearly was making a point about this particular game.If this was a one game issue, you would absolutely have a point. But this happens EVERY TIME we enter the third period with a lead. Theres proof, and its been posted in this very thread.
It’s more likely you see a trade than the coach being fired.
I just don’t see it. I agree with whoever said they wouldn’t have brought in an assistant with (with Hak’s stamp of approval), if they were really indeed close to letting him go.
The upper management is made up of morons. This is on Holmgren’s head at this point. A season like this, if it continues - should get him fired as well.
Kind of like how at the end of each of these types of games I say to myself this is the one that gets him fired.You've gotta be amazingly arrogant or amazingly stupid to repeatedly do something over and over, have it blow up in your face over and over, and insist it is the best way to do the thing.
So...Wilson was brought in to oversee the D. Is he determining ice time because it SEEMS like this has Haks stink all over it.
You've gotta be amazingly arrogant or amazingly stupid to repeatedly do something over and over, have it blow up in your face over and over, and insist it is the best way to do the thing.
I can't tell if this is referring to Hakstol or the people defending him.You've gotta be amazingly arrogant or amazingly stupid to repeatedly do something over and over, have it blow up in your face over and over, and insist it is the best way to do the thing.
It's just frustrating as hell that we are not getting better now, and not developing our assets for the future either.
But hey, they can't ask for big contracts if we don't let them play.