Boston Bruins 2023 Off-Season CAP, Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk IX

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fenian24

Registered User
Jun 14, 2010
10,364
13,460
Coyle was 49th among centers in even strength points last year. Here's a list of centers he outscored...

Patrice Bergeron
Elias Lindholm
Nazem Kadri
Sam Bennett
Sam Reinhart
Max Domi
William Karlsson
JT Compher
Kevin Hayes
Kuznetsov
Anders Lee
Eriksson Ek
Phillip Danault

He doesn't put up big point totals because he doesn't get much PP time on a team with Pasta, Marchand, Bergeron, DeBrusk... but at even strength he was better than a lot of 2nd line centers, despite getting 3rd line minutes and starting 54% of his shifts in the Dzone.
Besides Hayes and Kuzentsov I take everyone of them over Coyle.

Sam Bennett is the antithesis of Coyle, physical, driven, a great two way player who had a great playoff and has found his game and improved as he has gotten older, someone who drives a line and isn't a passenger. Coyle has remained consistantly mediocre, a bottom 6 forward paid like a top 6
 

PlayMakers

Moderator
Aug 9, 2004
25,221
25,085
Medfield, MA
www.medpuck.com
Charlie Coyle's career playoff numbers are an abomination, and that's even when you include 2019, the only playoff run of his life when he was a + player.

In 2019 he was +8 and had 16 points in 24 games while being a total beast, but that is a huge outlier compared to literally every other post-season of his NHL career.

His career playoff numbers tell a far more complete story: 106 games, 47 points, -29.

His playoff numbers are on par with his regular season numbers... 106 games, 47 points translates to 19 goals and 36 points per 82 playoff games, in a defensive role, with 56.4% Dzone starts.

Are there a lot of 3rd line centers averaging more than 20 goals and 40 points in the playoffs? Hell, there are a lot of 2nd line centers who don't produce that much, Cirelli, Anders Lee, Kotkaniemi, Chandler Stephenson... to name a few.

I agree the -29 is a black mark. I'm not a fan of plus/minus for obvious reasons but if you are maybe the problem is how they use him. In 2019 ("his last good playoff") he had over 50% offensive zone starts. In every playoff since, he's getting 55, 60, 70% Dzone starts.
 

EverettMike

FIRE DON SWEENEY INTO THE SUN
Mar 7, 2009
44,482
31,501
Everett, MA
twitter.com
His playoff numbers are on par with his regular season numbers... 106 games, 47 points translates to 19 goals and 36 points per 82 playoff games, in a defensive role, with 56.4% Dzone starts.

Are there a lot of 3rd line centers averaging more than 20 goals and 40 points in the playoffs? Hell, there are a lot of 2nd line centers who don't produce that much, Cirelli, Anders Lee, Kotkaniemi, Chandler Stephenson... to name a few.

I agree the -29 is a black mark. I'm not a fan of plus/minus for obvious reasons but if you are maybe the problem is how they use him. In 2019 ("his last good playoff") he had over 50% offensive zone starts. In every playoff since, he's getting 55, 60, 70% Dzone starts.

Sounds like ultimately we agree: he's a third line center.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GordonHowe

Mr. Make-Believe

The happy genius of my household
His playoff numbers are on par with his regular season numbers... 106 games, 47 points translates to 19 goals and 36 points per 82 playoff games, in a defensive role, with 56.4% Dzone starts.

Are there a lot of 3rd line centers averaging more than 20 goals and 40 points in the playoffs? Hell, there are a lot of 2nd line centers who don't produce that much, Cirelli, Anders Lee, Kotkaniemi, Chandler Stephenson... to name a few.

I agree the -29 is a black mark. I'm not a fan of plus/minus for obvious reasons but if you are maybe the problem is how they use him. In 2019 ("his last good playoff") he had over 50% offensive zone starts. In every playoff since, he's getting 55, 60, 70% Dzone starts.
I guess then if it's not a matter of talent, it must be one of deployment.

Why is a guy making $5.25M/yr getting 70% defensive zone starts? You would have to think you could get someone at half (a third?) that and be just as effective(-29).

Like either he deserves to be relied upon higher in the lineup OR he's overpaid as defensive specialist.
 

Dennis Bonvie

Registered User
Dec 29, 2007
29,434
17,850
Connecticut
And in the playoffs Coyle scored at .29 points per game while Hall was at 1.14. We have to lose some salary somewhere, and with Bergeron, Zacha and Geekie, why not keep more talent on wing? You also have Frederic and Merkulov that have a shot at playing center at some point.

I don’t have a problem with Coyle’s regular season production. It’s his inability to raise his game in the postseason at his cap hit.
You're talking about 7 games. Kind of a small sample size.

And I believe Coyle has actually been to the finals and was tied for the most goals in playoffs on that Bruins team as well as the best plus/minus of all the forwards on that team. Over 24 games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

PlayMakers

Moderator
Aug 9, 2004
25,221
25,085
Medfield, MA
www.medpuck.com
I guess then if it's not a matter of talent, it must be one of deployment.

Why is a guy making $5.25M/yr getting 70% defensive zone starts? You would have to think you could get someone at half (a third?) that and be just as effective(-29).

Like either he deserves to be relied upon higher in the lineup OR he's overpaid as defensive specialist.
Yeah, I think if they changed how he was deployed it would help. I don't think that necessarily means he needs to be higher in the lineup. In 2019 he was the 3c but he got more Ozone starts than Dzone starts and was very productive and effective.
 

Mainehockey33

Powerplay Specialist
Jul 15, 2011
10,225
7,764
Maine
You're talking about 7 games. Kind of a small sample size.

And I believe Coyle has actually been to the finals and was tied for the most goals in playoffs on that Bruins team as well as the best plus/minus of all the forwards on that team. Over 24 games.
I’d rather look at the most recent sample size we have, that 2019 run was 4 years ago. Coyle will never do that again. That was the only postseason he had a positive +/-. We’ve seen Coyle get power play time, there’s a reason he doesn’t get a lot of it.
 

GordonHowe

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 21, 2005
15,563
16,086
Watertown, Massachusetts
Yeah, 70% Dzone starts in the playoffs and people are mad because he didn't score more?

If ever there was a case for an 'eye test' guy this is it.

100%

At best, on a solid team, almost everyone has a specific role to play.

Last season, given Montgomery's mandate, Charlie Coyle played his, "to a T."

I remember something Bob Sweeney said about the B's Cup contending clubs of '88/'90, and, again, it's something you can say about any solid team,

"The scoreres scored. The plumbers plumbed. The goaltenders kept the puck out of our net.

"Everyone did their part."

And that's what hockey is all about, Charlie Brown.

1689478342054.png
 

quietbruinfan

Salt and light
Feb 2, 2022
6,451
5,368
Land of Nod in the East of Eden
100%

At best, on a solid team, almost everyone has a specific role to play.

Last season, given Montgomery's mandate, Charlie Coyle played his, "to a T."

I remember something Bob Sweeney said about the B's Cup contending clubs of '88/'90, and, again, it's something you can say about any solid team,

"The scoreres scored. The plumbers plumbed. The goaltenders kept the puck out of our net.

"Everyone did their part."

And that's what hockey is all about, Charlie Brown.

View attachment 729197
I remember the quote, and "plumbers don't plum...."
 
  • Like
Reactions: GordonHowe

Absurdity

light switch connoisseur
Jul 6, 2012
10,667
6,619
...It’s never been more difficult to swing trades in the NHL, Jarmo Kekalainen said, a product of the flattened salary cap that leaves little room to get creative. That’s tough news for a GM who’d like to thin his group of forwards, if possible. “The whole league is pretty much capped out right now,” Kekalainen said. “You could probably move dollar for dollar, so … we’re not going to be getting our summer vacation started anytime soon. Things have quieted down a bit, but the phones are still working.”

Kekalainen left open the possibility that arbitration judgments could cause some tremors across the league that could propel roster movement. Last week, 22 players filed for arbitration. The hearings will be held between July 20-August 4. Most will settle before they ever reach the point of a hearing, however. “Some teams might get some (arbitration awards) they don’t like, and that might change the situation,” Kekalainen said. “There’s another buyout window that could change things. We’re going to keep an eye on all those things and keep working at it.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

DominicT

Registered User
Sep 6, 2009
20,028
33,855
Stratford Ontario
dom.hockey
Noah Cates got 2.6mil and is probably a good comparable for Freddy as well, can't see him getting 3+mil after those two.
And to get $2.6 million in arbitration, he's probably asking for around the $3 million mark and the Bruins are offering around the $2 million mark. I'd rather not take a chance in front of the arbitrator.

I got no info whatsoever on this, but IMO this should have been one of the easier and quicker deals to get done. This isn't David Pastrnak that required months of negotiations.

Heck, it only took 24 hours to sign Hampus Lindholm to an 8-year $52 million contract after acquiring him. We're on day 77 on Trent Frederic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff and hrdpuk

DKH

The Bergeron of HF
Feb 27, 2002
74,254
52,040
Coyle is a durable player and hard to knock off the puck. Can move up the lineup if needed.
His contract will look better these next 3 years.
He isn't the B's problem.
He’s exactly what they need out of a third line center and his contract is fair as comes for his versatility to move up and down lineup and both special teams

I’m GM and he’s a UFA he gets $5.5 M for 3 years in a second
 

burstnbloom

Registered User
Mar 10, 2006
4,544
3,948
The coyle discourse...

47th highest cap hit for a center. Number 2 center money.

47th highest points for a center. Number 2 center points.

Every year the same discussion by the same people.

You can not want to pay this player this money, but his money is not out of line with his production. It's just an incorrect take. Adjust your argument for the love of god.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad