Rumor: 2023-24 Trade Rumors and Free Agency: Part Deux

Status
Not open for further replies.

JH21

Registered User
Oct 20, 2019
2,940
2,197
Crazy to think that at one point this team had all of Duchene/ROR/Stastny/MacKinnon.

You'd think Joe Sakic of all people would understand the value of centers.

And how well did we play when we had those guys?
 

AllAboutAvs

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 25, 2006
9,453
7,605
Do you remember the D those teams were fielding? Guenin, Holden, Redmond, Cuminskey, Zanon.... should I continue?
That is kind of my point. It doesn't matter how good your C depth is if the rest of the roster is crap.
 

AllAboutAvs

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 25, 2006
9,453
7,605
Because that team was shit.

If you hear "you can't win without proper center depth" and your brain turns that into "you can't lose with proper center depth" that's on you, bud.
But you said in your original post that Sakic should understand the importance of C depth because we had at one point Duchene/ROR/Stastny/Mack. My point is that it doesn't matter how good your C depth is if the rest of the roster is crap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alienblood

The Abusement Park

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2016
34,246
25,456
But you said in your original post that Sakic should understand the importance of C depth because we had at one point Duchene/ROR/Stastny/Mack. My point is that it doesn't matter how good your C depth is if the rest of the roster is crap.
Just like it doesn’t matter how good your D core is if the rest of the roster is crap.
 

RoyIsALegend

Gross Misconduct
Sponsor
Oct 24, 2008
22,734
30,990
IMG_3948.gif
 

AvsFan2123

Registered User
Jan 21, 2014
939
157
Illinois
So obviously there’s not a whole lot left as far as rentals go for 2C. Henrique didn’t seem like a huge upgrade but I read a fairly encouraging article from Dom that made me a little more on board for him. Honestly would rather have him than Wennberg I think. Cause we can possibly pawn off RyJo in that same trade. But basically Dom said Henrique can work as a 2C if paired with skilled and hard working wings. Hello. That’s something the Avs DO have a fair amount of, with or without Landeskog. I say that assuming Nuke is back at some point this year. G wasn’t gone all that long. Hoping we see Val pop up at practice within the next couple weeks. Also that’s with or without Landeskog. To meet halfway, I’ll do it with Nuke and no Landy. With Kovalenko;

Drouin - Mack - Rantanen
Lehkonen - Henrique - Nichushkin
Wood - Colton - LOC
Cogliano - Olofsson - Parise


I’m not saying I want Henrique, I would like a solution for longer term. If not addressed at TDL then please FFS this summer. But I’m mostly saying I won’t be as bummed if it is him cause it sounds like he’s better than we think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: obZen and The Moops

Balthazar

I haven't talked to the trainers yet
Sponsor
Apr 25, 2006
49,685
52,965
I’m not saying I want Henrique, I would like a solution for longer term.
The easiest path for this GM (short of doing nothing) is to go for Henrique at the deadline and hope for Ritchie next year.
 

JH21

Registered User
Oct 20, 2019
2,940
2,197
Just like it doesn’t matter how good your D core is if the rest of the roster is crap.

We were one of the worst teams in the league with that center group.

Right now we are tied for the 6th most points in the league all without Landeskog and key guys like Lehkonen and Nichushkin missing large portions. With this defensive group. And won a Cup with a one handed Kadri at 2C.

So yeah.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Foppa2118

Ararana

Registered User
Sep 22, 2013
17,817
28,118
Two Rivers
But you said in your original post that Sakic should understand the importance of C depth because we had at one point Duchene/ROR/Stastny/Mack. My point is that it doesn't matter how good your C depth is if the rest of the roster is crap.

No. Sakic should understand the importance of center depth because he was a center in the NHL for 20 damn years. The fact that he let 3 of those 4 centers slip through his fingers is just proof that he doesn't.

Obviously being strong in one position isn't enough to win, regardless of what that position is. No one is arguing that. I'm arguing that you will not win if you're weak down the middle, regardless of how strong you are in other positions. Center depth is a requirement for any cup aspirations.
 

Alienblood

Registered User
Nov 22, 2021
4,127
2,204
No. Sakic should understand the importance of center depth because he was a center in the NHL for 20 damn years. The fact that he let 3 of those 4 centers slip through his fingers is just proof that he doesn't.

Obviously being strong in one position isn't enough to win, regardless of what that position is. No one is arguing that. I'm arguing that you will not win if you're weak down the middle, regardless of how strong you are in other positions. Center depth is a requirement for any cup aspirations.
A strong d core is too and actually is more important
 

Ararana

Registered User
Sep 22, 2013
17,817
28,118
Two Rivers
A strong d core is too and actually is more important

I understand the argument, and I agree both positions are exceptionally important. But IMO I take centers over defensemen by a fair margin in a vacuum.

Now in the case of today's Avs, they could easily ship off a defenseman not named Makar and they'd still have two of Toews/Byram/Girard + Manson.

But here we are... The Avs have basically turned themselves into the inverse of the Maple Leafs. They're simply not going to win as currently constructed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alienblood

Alienblood

Registered User
Nov 22, 2021
4,127
2,204
I understand the argument, and I agree both positions are exceptionally important. But IMO I take centers over defensemen by a fair margin in a vacuum.

Now in the case of today's Avs, they could easily ship off a defenseman not named Makar and they'd still have two of Toews/Byram/Girard + Manson. But here we are...
I've played both positions and defense is for more important. You have to better skater better skate all ways and you have much fire control.iver the cane in general


But yeah C is important too. Have you ever watched Tavares try ro skate backwards or how easily a forward gets best whe they are covering a dman. It's quite surprising how bad a mot of the forwards skate backwards
 

The Abusement Park

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2016
34,246
25,456
We were one of the worst teams in the league with that center group.

Right now we are tied for the 6th most points in the league all without Landeskog and key guys like Lehkonen and Nichushkin missing large portions. With this defensive group. And won a Cup with a one handed Kadri at 2C.

So yeah.
I mean the cup winning team and this one aren’t remotely comparable.

And the current team is just being dragged along by Mack, Mikko, and Makar. The depth is either not good enough or playing wayyy to high in the lineup. Any team with half decent depth has a very good chance of beating this roster as currently constructed.
 

JH21

Registered User
Oct 20, 2019
2,940
2,197
I understand the argument, and I agree both positions are exceptionally important. But IMO I take centers over defensemen by a fair margin in a vacuum.

Now in the case of today's Avs, they could easily ship off a defenseman not named Makar and they'd still have two of Toews/Byram/Girard + Manson.

But here we are... The Avs have basically turned themselves into the inverse of the Maple Leafs. They're simply not going to win as currently constructed.

Franchise Dmen are extremely hard to find. Capable 1C's are not IMO. We are just fortunate to have both.

It's kindof proof when we had 4 legit centers but God awful Dmen for almost a decade. You can find top centers almost anywhere. Not elite guys like Mackinnon but guys who can carry their line and put up 80 points. But finding a Dman who can play 25 minutes a night on both ends? Good luck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Foppa2118

AllAboutAvs

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 25, 2006
9,453
7,605
No. Sakic should understand the importance of center depth because he was a center in the NHL for 20 damn years. The fact that he let 3 of those 4 centers slip through his fingers is just proof that he doesn't.

Obviously being strong in one position isn't enough to win, regardless of what that position is. No one is arguing that. I'm arguing that you will not win if you're weak down the middle, regardless of how strong you are in other positions. Center depth is a requirement for any cup aspirations.
Your first paragraph points to me misunderstanding your initial point....although I disagree that he doesn't care. Stastny saw himself being sqeezed out to 3C and therefore losing money. ROR wanted out because of a contract dispute with somebody else than Sakic. Duchene wanted out because "he wanted to play playoffs hockey".
 

Pierce Hawthorne

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 29, 2012
45,266
42,933
Caverns of Draconis
Centers are the most important players on a team(comparatively at least) and a #1C is by far the most important position in hockey. I'd say the only thing more rare than an elite 1C, is a #1 that's Right Handed.


Avs are extremely lucky to have both right now which is precisely why it should be incredibly frustrating to everyone that our management is not giving those two guys enough support to win multiple cups.


Teams spend years looking for just 1 of those guys(Elite 1C or #1RHD) nevermind getting 2.
 

JH21

Registered User
Oct 20, 2019
2,940
2,197
I mean the cup winning team and this one aren’t remotely comparable.

And the current team is just being dragged along by Mack, Mikko, and Makar. The depth is either not good enough or playing wayyy to high in the lineup. Any team with half decent depth has a very good chance of beating this roster as currently constructed.

Take guys like Landeskog, Nichushkin and Lehkonen off any team and their depth will suffer.

Guys were complaining last year that we didn't replace Landy but it's easier said than done replacing a guy like him.

As for our team defensive game, when you lose 3 elite defensive forwards for most of the year your D game will suffer. That's the way it is.

The fact is guys like Kiviranta and MacDermid have to play because Lehkonen and Nichushkin have been out and we cannot just replace a guy like Landeskog overnight.

Do you think we would still be having this argument if we had this team group playing every single game from the start of the season:

Landeskog- Mackinnon- Nichushkin
Lehkonen- Who cares- Rantanen
Drouin- Johansen- Cogliano
Wood- Colton- O'Connor

Toews - Makar
Girard- Manson
Byram - Johnson
 

Pokecheque

I’ve been told it’s spelled “Pokecheck”
Sponsor
Aug 5, 2003
46,286
29,430
The Flatlands
www.armoredheadspace.com
No. Sakic should understand the importance of center depth because he was a center in the NHL for 20 damn years. The fact that he let 3 of those 4 centers slip through his fingers is just proof that he doesn't.

Obviously being strong in one position isn't enough to win, regardless of what that position is. No one is arguing that. I'm arguing that you will not win if you're weak down the middle, regardless of how strong you are in other positions. Center depth is a requirement for any cup aspirations.
I mean if we're using that argument, those teams that Sakic played on also had some kick-ass wingers on them as well.

Also to be fair to Sakic, he did indeed shore up the center depth for the Avs during HIS tenure, I get that he's still in a position of power but the decision to let Kadri walk and instead use cap space to re-sign Manson, that one's on MacFarland.

If there's one major faceplant Sakic made during his tenure it's that he did far, far too little to fix the drafting.
 

The Abusement Park

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2016
34,246
25,456
Take guys like Landeskog, Nichushkin and Lehkonen off any team and their depth will suffer.

Guys were complaining last year that we didn't replace Landy but it's easier said than done replacing a guy like him.

As for our team defensive game, when you lose 3 elite defensive forwards for most of the year your D game will suffer. That's the way it is.

The fact is guys like Kiviranta and MacDermid have to play because Lehkonen and Nichushkin have been out and we cannot just replace a guy like Landeskog overnight.

Do you think we would still be having this argument if we had this team group playing every single game from the start of the season:

Landeskog- Mackinnon- Nichushkin
Lehkonen- Who cares- Rantanen
Drouin- Johansen- Cogliano
Wood- Colton- O'Connor

Toews - Makar
Girard- Manson
Byram - Johnson
I mean Landy coming back and being effective top 6 player is very much up for debate. I really don’t think he should be counted on at all in the playoffs.

Drouin-Mack-Nuke
Lehky-Wennberg-Mikko
Wood-Colton-LOC
Cogs-Olofsson-Kiviranta

This is probably the most likely playoff forward group. And it’s fine. If they add a higher end 2C then the cup chances shoot up dramatically. But I just don’t believe in the FO to add the pieces necessary at the TDL.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad