I don't think players are siloed away from the team if they develop in Europe. Only NCAA prospects are 'independent' from the team's influence.
Sure, but the stars "development" of European players is mostly hands off.
Over the last 20years the more "hands on" the Stars have had with development (which does extend to the CHL), the worse those players have been.
If you were to compare the defensemen that played in the NHL for the stars, those that spent significant time developing in Europe/NCAA away from the direct control of the Stars vs staying in NA (CHL/ECHL/AHL), you would find players that the "hands off" players played almost 4000 games in the NHL and counting. and the Hands On players are under 2000 games.
You would also find that all but Dillon are players who were drafted in the 1st round.
Where's the Euro/NCAA group would only have Heiskanen and Niskanen in the 1st round.
You can look at Honka.
He was drafted in the 1st round. He followed team advice and jumped to the AHL, using the Euro player loophole. spent several years listening to and following Stars coaches advice. Absolute dogshit player.
Oleksiak was rescued by Pittsburgh.
Harley is still tbd but at least looks good.
Dillon is really the Stars lone "success" story for a complete hands on development not turning into complete dogshit.
I'm sure the Stars were in contact with Klingberg, Heiskanen, Lindell, etc, while they were in Europe, and probably said focus on this or work on this. but we know they weren't there everyday "directing" them, and not so coincidentally they're the players that, far more often, turn into anything at the NHL level for the Stars