Lol @ cutting players from the Q who performed better than a lot of other grinders.... old mentality never change.
Shane Wright was awful...too
Cuylle over Roy is indefensible based on performance in the camp IMO but I also think the “anti-QMJHL” narrative is a joke.Who are you referring to exactly? I dont really see anyone on that list that was outplayed at camp at all
My lineup:
Perfetti-Wright-Guenther
Stankoven-McTavish-Bedard
Johnson-Bourque-Bourgault
Neighbours-Grieg-Sourdif
Cuylle, Desnoyers
Power-Guhle
Sebrango-Zellweger
Lambos-Cormier
O’Rourke, Seeley
I would also have Savoie, Lapierre, Roy, and Clarke here over Cuylle, Desnoyers, Sourdif, and Seeley but the lineup still looks good despite missing Byfield, Drysdale, Sillinger, and Jarvis.
Cuylle over Roy is indefensible based on performance in the camp IMO but I also think the “anti-QMJHL” narrative is a joke.
I dont necessarily think so. Cuylle was brought to play a fourth line type energy role and he played it extremely well in camp. He adds a completely different element to the team and was noticeable, especially in the first scrimmage. Hes almost a goal per game in Windsor too so its not like hes just some meat head. I've seen a few guys bring up Cuylle in here and I thought he was actually really solid in camp. I noticed him more than Roy personally so I dont think its some major travesty at the very least or even close to being an anti Q thing
I feel like Tverberg was way better as an energy player. Cuylle's line in the first game could barely do anything in the offensive zone. I guess he could throw hits but they never felt effective in terms of changing possession.
Tverberg was really strong on the forecheck and his line cycled real well in the offensive zone.
Tverberg had a good first period but did absolutely nothing to stand out after that in the first game. I also think theres some people shitting in Cuylle because of his line. Cuylle himself played well and was doing all kinds of good stuff, his line wasnt and theres a difference. I didnt get to watch much of the second game so maybe he was better in parts I missed but it seems like all the ype I've read on Tverberg was from that first period of the first game
Even if you thought Tverberg was better (a stretch but you can have it), thinking hes way better somehow makes me think youre a Leaf fan because I dont see how anyone would really see it that way without some bias in the mix.
Love that 3rd line.
Not sure about running Power-Guhle as a pairing. I like them both anchoring the top 4 LHD spots playing monster minutes. Being able to throw one of them on the ice at all times makes us a stronger team in tight games.
Tverberg had a good first period but did absolutely nothing to stand out after that in the first game. I also think theres some people shitting in Cuylle because of his line. Cuylle himself played well and was doing all kinds of goaod stuff, his line wasnt and theres a difference. I didnt get to watch much of the second game so maybe he was better in parts I missed but it seems like all the ype I've read on Tverberg was from that first period of the first game
Even if you thought Tverberg was better (a stretch but you can have it), thinking hes way better somehow makes me think youre a Leaf fan because I dont see how anyone would really see it that way without some bias in the mix.
For Clarke: either some snarky comments he made about not being invited last year or if you believe the public reasoning he’s not good enough in his own zoneDid it ever come out why they snubbed Clarke? Too bad Savoie isn’t there either but oh well - still a strong roster, hard to call it strongest possible under the circumstances but gold is still well within reach with that top 6.