Clownish
Registered User
- Jan 1, 2014
- 2,042
- 805
You really think they are near this?When Chicago loses Kane this roster can be in the discussion of worst rosters in NHL history.
92-93 Lightning
You really think they are near this?When Chicago loses Kane this roster can be in the discussion of worst rosters in NHL history.
Shawn Chambers was literally 1 overall in in NHL 93.
The ABC line!Roster when the Hawks were bad...
TArnason
MBell
TRuutu
SSullivan
KCalder
BMcLean
SNichol
IKorolev RIP
VNieminen
IRadulov
TMoen
RVandenbussche
BBerard
NDempsey
DQuint
SPoapst
JStrudwick
JAitken
MLeighton
CAnderson
2003-04...then lockout...then Tallon screw up with the ‘new NHL’ rules, does anyone remember the 2005-06 season and the Hawks brought league officials in to explain obstruction to its players about 12 games into the season? Tallon admitted to building the wrong kinda team coming out of lockout...that roster was just as bad
Our currently defence looks WAY BETTER than that didRoster when the Hawks were bad...
TArnason
MBell
TRuutu
SSullivan
KCalder
BMcLean
SNichol
IKorolev RIP
VNieminen
IRadulov
TMoen
RVandenbussche
BBerard
NDempsey
DQuint
SPoapst
JStrudwick
JAitken
MLeighton
CAnderson
2003-04...then lockout...then Tallon screw up with the ‘new NHL’ rules, does anyone remember the 2005-06 season and the Hawks brought league officials in to explain obstruction to its players about 12 games into the season? Tallon admitted to building the wrong kinda team coming out of lockout...that roster was just as bad
It's not a long list of highlights.Anytime I see the name Aitken I remember his 1 punch TKO.
Hopefully looking like a nhl playerWe are a week away from seeing Ian Mitchell in action again
I can't contain my excitement
You better believe it!
Have you looked at Arizona?I think our goaltending is really going to be the issue (probably worst tandem in the league) our D could be slightly better are Off will be worse and hopefully way worse come FEB
Have you looked at Arizona?
Obviously I want Chicago to win, it’ll be hard this season unless Richardson has some kind of coaching greatness...that said I’d love for the Hawks to get a top 3 pick this year...I’d live for TB to crap the bed and have a 11-16 pick from them this year, then they do worse next year so we get an unprotected 2025 1st!...also Dallas being really bad would be great as well...
2023 Draft Hawks pick
1-3 Chicago
11-16 Tampa Bay
33-35 Chicago
43-48 Tampa Bay
65-67 Chicago
65-67 Dallas
97-99 Chicago
7 picks in the top 100
I still have nightmares of the coach giving Steve Poapst top 4 ice minutes. It was like Verne Gagne putting Greg Gagne in the main event.Our currently defence looks WAY BETTER than that did
The Blackhawks from 2003 to 2007 were bad...then they were able to pick Toews at #3, and won the draft lottery to select Kane #1...3 Cups later and poor hockey since what 2018? It’ll come people, it’ll comeAnd possibly a 1st round pick from the Kane trade. If the Hawks finish with the worst record and don't get screwed by the ping pong balls - they will have 3 picks in to top-33 and a 4th if they get one in a Kane trade.
Acknowledging counting chickens before they hatch is a jinx - what if they get a top-3 pick with their own 1st rounder - would you trade the 2 late 1st round picks (TB and from Kane trade) along with their own 2nd round pick (33-35?) to move up to grab another top-12 pick?
Granted there's still a whole hockey season to go and the players projected to go in the 1st round will get shuffled around but I think the general consensus is the first 3 picks are pretty solidified with Bedard being #1 and Michkov and Fantilli being the other two top-3 picks. But then the next 10-15 are all high end players worthy to be in the top-10 - so maybe a #12 pick would be worth giving up the #24, #28, and #33 picks?
If Kane goes anywhere really want it to be the Rangers, I would love Kane Panarin 2.0. Funny part about these two wasn't just their crazy plays to each other but also it was the reaction afterwards.