DatDude44
Hmmmm?
- Feb 23, 2012
- 6,155
- 2,917
At #23 we should not be drafting for need, we should solely selected based on pro potential. Regardless of position.
If you had let’s say #3 and your choosing between Nemec and Cooley….and u feel your organization needs a cornerstone RHD (for example Seattle) you’d take Nemec since they already have that future C in Beniers. And vice versa if your a team like philly. Because u assume those top top picks are cornerstone players so positional depth and future contracts could play into the decision a bit.
So for me at 23…… it’s an absolute mixed bag. I’ve just started scratching the surface on this years draft so forgive me for lack of expertise/ options but right now I’d love any of :
Marco Kasper, Jimmy Snuggerud(imo the real sleeper on NTDP) Connor Geekie, Pavel Mintyukov, Denton Mateychuk (all who I believe go before 23) or Ryan Chesley (boring but safe), Filip Mesar, David Goyette (Probly too high)
And if we move Perunovich in a chycrun deal per say, I’d love lane hutson. Take the long term development approach with that kid and we could reap some serious benefits 4-6 years from now and hello Krug replacement.
If you had let’s say #3 and your choosing between Nemec and Cooley….and u feel your organization needs a cornerstone RHD (for example Seattle) you’d take Nemec since they already have that future C in Beniers. And vice versa if your a team like philly. Because u assume those top top picks are cornerstone players so positional depth and future contracts could play into the decision a bit.
So for me at 23…… it’s an absolute mixed bag. I’ve just started scratching the surface on this years draft so forgive me for lack of expertise/ options but right now I’d love any of :
Marco Kasper, Jimmy Snuggerud(imo the real sleeper on NTDP) Connor Geekie, Pavel Mintyukov, Denton Mateychuk (all who I believe go before 23) or Ryan Chesley (boring but safe), Filip Mesar, David Goyette (Probly too high)
And if we move Perunovich in a chycrun deal per say, I’d love lane hutson. Take the long term development approach with that kid and we could reap some serious benefits 4-6 years from now and hello Krug replacement.