What is the direction? Please enlighten me.
The direction of the organization has been and is to build from the net out. That's our bread and butter. Our problem was always going to be transitioning from the Twins. The org has been trying to get faster, more two-way players while hoping for their draftees to develop. Due to injuries, the Ducks have scored top-10 picks three consecutive years. They have hit on the first two with C Zegras and D Drysdale, but are waiting to see what holds for this year's draft.
Faster, two-way players are more malleable to conform to may different styles of play. The burgeoning forward youth corps has created a more positive outlook. Yet, plain and simple, the Ducks are still lacking forward talent. What I am really excited for going forward is our defense. The additions of Drysdale and Fleury helps to mitigate the huge drop in defensive play whenever we lose either Lindholm or Manson or both for an extended period of time.
The injuries to Kesler and Eaves in 2017 set everything askew. Perry dropping off the cliff in 2018 prompted the rebuild in 2019-20 and this past season. Our lack of forward talent in 2018 by missing Kelser, Eaves, and Perry helped land us the 9th pick overall in the 2019 draft, which was Zegras. In 2019-20, already lacking talent at the forward position, our defensive unit got injured en masse! That landed us with the 6th overall pick, which was Drysdale. It was year 1 of the rebuild as we pushed the youth movement. In 2020-21, we are without F Kase and F Ritchie when we traded them away at the 2019-20 TDL, so we are even more talentless at the forward position. This was year two of the youth movement. Two terrible things happened for the 2020-21 season, COVID ruined any semblance of a proper training camp and our defense got marred again with injuries. We're slated for at least a top-4 pick in this upcoming draft.
Our identity at ES is to maintain offensive possession in the offensive zone longer. Eakins has been instructing our defense to pinch to keep the puck in the offensive zone. We need our forwards to be cognizant of this and quickly fill that hole left behind by the pinching defenseman. If we keep the puck in the offensive zone longer, then the opposing team isn't scoring on us as well as give us extra opportunities to score a goal. This is Eakins' philosophy and the 29 one-goal games is a testament to that philosophy. I'm not a fan of Eakins, but this philosophy of his apparently works with the dearth of talent on the team.
Our PP has been atrocious. That's one area that GM Murray can address by finding a far better assistant coach. (One of the finalist for the Ducks coaching job had a great PP acumen and that's the guy I wanted over Eakins.) I don't know why Eakins falls short in this area, but he does.
Our PK has drastically improved between 2019-20 to 2020-21. I don't know who gets kudos for that, but kudos is warranted. Of course, having Lindholm or Manson in the lineup vastly improves our efficiency. Yet, we have found some good forward PK'ers in Lundy and Volkov.
Going into this off-season, the Ducks are going to have a lot of cap space to work with than before. Recall, this was by design. Perry's buyout increased to $6.625 in 2020-21 and we traded for Backes' $4.5 mil in order to get a late first rounder in 2020, which turned out to be RW Perreault... who is looking like a steal at 27th overall.
Going into next season, it'll be year 3 of the youth movement. Anaheim needs some top-6 talent infusion either by way of FA signing or a trade. (BTW, Anaheim flexed its muscles on its futures by being a finalist for the PLD sweepstakes by using only futures without Zegras and Drysdale.) Also, Anaheim needs to vastly improve it's PP coach. GM Murray is a tinkerer, but his vision is long term. It would be a fail in everyone's eyes if we don't acquire a top-6 talent or two this summer, though.