GDT: 2020 NHL Free Agent Frenzy VI

Status
Not open for further replies.

Smitty93

Registered User
Dec 6, 2012
8,216
9,380
I'm thinking DeBrusk is their 2LW, and I'm OK with that. Didn't quite take the step forward we were hoping for this past season and turn into that 30+ goal-scorer, but given cap constraints and the current roster make up, I'm OK with bringing him back in that spot and hoping for further development.

I wouldn't sign another forward.

I'm not sure there's any reason to believe he's going to improve in year 4. I get that he's only 24 (in a week), but I can't say I've seen improvement from him since he entered the league. Don't get me wrong, that's still a good player, but there's been no evidence that he's got another level he can get to. It seems like he is what he is at this point.

I know people like to point to Marchand as taking the leap in his 6th year as an example of the potential for growth even when it's seemed to have stagnated, but there were very good reasons in Marchand's case. Primarily it was that he got more ice-time, specifically on the powerplay, and he started shooting more (went from 2 to 3 shots per game). DeBrusk has already been given plenty of opportunities and has been attached at the hip with Krejci since Day 1 (even if that isn't actually a good fit).
 
  • Like
Reactions: chrisab123

chrisab123

Registered User
Feb 9, 2013
2,285
1,776
I'm not sure there's any reason to believe he's going to improve in year 4. I get that he's only 24 (in a week), but I can't say I've seen improvement from him since he entered the league. Don't get me wrong, that's still a good player, but there's been no evidence that he's got another level he can get to. It seems like he is what he is at this point.

I know people like to point to Marchand as taking the leap in his 6th year as an example of the potential for growth even when it's seemed to have stagnated, but there were very good reasons in Marchand's case. Primarily it was that he got more ice-time, specifically on the powerplay, and he started shooting more (went from 2 to 3 shots per game). DeBrusk has already been given plenty of opportunities and has been attached at the hip with Krejci since Day 1 (even if that isn't actually a good fit).

Marchand probably had to do more with staying out of the box and maturing too. He could always find the net. He's a completely different player than DeBrusk. I think DeBrusk is a solid player but he is what he is.
 

Greek_physique

Caron - Legit SNIPER
Jul 9, 2004
23,040
3,197
Toronto, Ont
Don't laugh, that idea has crossed my mind..

Marchand-Bergeron-Pastrnak
Debrusk-Krejci-Coyle/Smith
Bjork-Coyle/Smith-Kase
Kuraly-Studnicka-Wagner
as of this moment..

I just hate Kase on 3rd...he wont see the ice in the 3rd.

Maybe send him to Calgary in a package for Bennett?

Marchand Bergie Pasta
Debrusk DK ??
Bennett Coyle Smith
 

LouJersey

Registered User
Jun 29, 2002
68,513
43,077
Graves to Gardens
youtu.be
being a big player in free agency year after year is a stupid way to build a team and it’s bound for failure. He’s tried to make a couple big signings that he thought would fit in, they just didn’t work (Beleskey, Backes). He’s done great with the depth signings

basically my complaint with him is not getting Krejci a winger that meshes well with him for more than half a season at a time (I miss u Mojo). But imo it hasn’t been for a lack of trying. They’ve picked up 3 established names (Nash, Backes, Mojo) and Beleskey who was coming off of 30 goals in 82 games the prior season. They’ve tried kids. We’ve just gotten wildly unlucky. Statistically speaking we should have found a solution by now lol

Here is what happens though.

Season ends to the draft, no trades
Draft weekend, no trades
UFA comes, no trades, low budget signings or flat out bad ones (players they target, not very good)
Summer comes and goes, team no real additions
Regular season comes, nothing
Trade deadline comes, trade futures for guys, mostly that you let go.

Rinse, repeat. 5v5 hockey hasn't been great for them. When they actually went in the one time they got Coyle and MoJo and made the finals. He always speaks about the core group, and internal competition and all that and well it hasn't produced a championship. The time is now to add. You have to go for it. This team is absolutely cooked when Bergeron and Krejci leave, and what happens God Forbid if the Bruins don't feel Pasta is worth 10-11 mil per?
 

Bruinaura

Resident Cookie Monster
Mar 29, 2014
46,566
91,214
*checks in for updates*

*Sees rehash of every move Sweeney's ever made or not made*

*Drops off cookies*

Easiest-Chocolate-Chip-Cookies-800-2.jpg


*Waits for next new Bruin to be signed*
 

LouJersey

Registered User
Jun 29, 2002
68,513
43,077
Graves to Gardens
youtu.be
I'm thinking DeBrusk is their 2LW, and I'm OK with that. Didn't quite take the step forward we were hoping for this past season and turn into that 30+ goal-scorer, but given cap constraints and the current roster make up, I'm OK with bringing him back in that spot and hoping for further development.

I wouldn't sign another forward.

he's not. He's a rod hockey player that stays in his lane, has zero hockey sense in regards to using his line mates and always goes wide and loses the puck instead of crashing the net. The puck dies on his stick. He's been gifted this spot for three years now, and it's not working. He's teflon, no criticism sticks, and the staff and brass never hold him accountable.

A past Fluto athletic article re: JDB “He’s a really good third-line left wing on a good team,” one evaluator said of the 23-year-old DeBrusk. “He disappeared in the playoffs. He’d take the puck wide and the play died.”
 

ON3M4N

Ignores/60 = Elite
Dec 13, 2015
13,130
18,157
Connecticut
Here is what happens though.

Season ends to the draft, no trades
Draft weekend, no trades
UFA comes, no trades, low budget signings or flat out bad ones (players they target, not very good)
Summer comes and goes, team no real additions
Regular season comes, nothing
Trade deadline comes, trade futures for guys, mostly that you let go.

Rinse, repeat. 5v5 hockey hasn't been great for them. When they actually went in the one time they got Coyle and MoJo and made the finals. He always speaks about the core group, and internal competition and all that and well it hasn't produced a championship. The time is now to add. You have to go for it. This team is absolutely cooked when Bergeron and Krejci leave, and what happens God Forbid if the Bruins don't feel Pasta is worth 10-11 mil per?

That's why they went out and added Craig Smith
 

Don Cherry

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
3,891
2,283
he's not. He's a rod hockey player that stays in his lane, has zero hockey sense in regards to using his line mates and always goes wide and loses the puck instead of crashing the net. The puck dies on his stick. He's been gifted this spot for three years now, and it's not working. He's teflon, no criticism sticks, and the staff and brass never hold him accountable.
Debrusk is totally "meh" if you ask me. He hates contact and his refusal to play physical probably costs both he and the team 10 goals per season. Why he's golden here is beyond me.
 

sarge88

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 29, 2003
25,782
21,750
I can’t believe we’re so unlucky.

I mean how many other fanbases are stuck with a GM that has made some good moves and some bad ones?

(Disclaimer....I’m lukewarm to him. Wouldn’t be upset if he’s fired or given another 2-3 years).
 

Smitty93

Registered User
Dec 6, 2012
8,216
9,380
He doesn't score enough. Always seemed like more of a defensive guy to me. Clode would love him.

This isn't accurate, at least over his career. Over his last three seasons with Minnesota, he averaged 0.84 points per game and had an 82-game scoring pace of 23 goals. Not a big goal scorer, he's basically equal to Krejci in that regard, except he shoots more. The offense dried up when he got to Nashville, but they were a mess the last 18 months, and clearly the fit was bad. I'm not sure if the fit here would be any good, but I think he'd probably come in the cheapest of the top wing options (Hoffman, Dadonov, Toffoli, and Granlund), and all of them have questions, so might as well just go after the cheapest one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wintersej

ON3M4N

Ignores/60 = Elite
Dec 13, 2015
13,130
18,157
Connecticut
I can’t believe we’re so unlucky.

I mean how many other fanbases are stuck with a GM that has made some good moves and some bad ones?

(Disclaimer....I’m lukewarm to him. Wouldn’t be upset if he’s fired or given another 2-3 years).

I'd rather see them get rid of Neely
 

1dreamof1cup

Registered User
Jan 9, 2016
544
277
Backes, Beleskey, 2015 1st round.....what else you want to throw in here?
Moore, Synyshin, Zboril, Frederic (who could have been taken later), this year top picks, both Ritchie, Hayes. Also never fixed the hole on the 2nd line. Inability to trade for OEL when he's only interested in 2 teams. I know i'm forgetting some too, just too lazy to check them out atm
 

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
24,648
22,478
Inherited is a pretty funny word here considering he was part of the team that brought a bunch of those pieces in.

How many can you really give him credit for?

He was hired as director of player development in June 2006, promoted to director of hockey ops in 2007 and assistant GM in 2009.

So he really had nothing to do with bringing in Bergeron, Krejci, Chara, Rask, or Marchand.

So that leaves Pastrnak and Gryz who were both brought in while he was Assistant GM. Toss in Krug too.

Fact is, the core group of this team since 2008ish he inherited.

He was part of some hits at the draft table. 2014-2017 he was part of finding some good players even if their were some glaring misses. The 2018-2020 drafts will hurt both on the players chosen, the lengthy timeline for development, and the picks traded away.

His big name UFA acquisitions have been poor. Belesky and Backes didn't work out. John Moore became a spare part quickly and his most useful quality would be shipping him elsewhere for cap space. We'll see if handing Craig Smith 3-years was a prudent move.

On the flip side, he's done decent on under-the-radar low cost UFA signings (Riley Nash, Nordstrom, Schaller, Halak, Khudobin, etc.)

His first year of trades was pretty awful both that summer and the 2016 deadline which he chose to hang onto Eriksson and trade away a bevy of picks for mediocre help when it was clear that team wasn't a contender (proven by the fact they didn't even make the playoffs).

He ended up paying a fairly hefty price for Rick Nash, but he couldn't of foreseen the concussion. He made two very nice deals in 2019 for Coyle (his best trade by far) and Mojo. The jury is still out on his Kase and Ritchie deals. He practically never makes any trades during the season, choosing only to deal around July 1st and the trade deadline.

Without the bevy of talent acquired from June 2003 to July 1st 2006, he'd be in big trouble, no doubt about it. But on the other hand, he's done very well at extending the Bruins own guys to very nice deals.

That's a pretty big mixed bag when you look at his drafting, signings, and trades. If you were grading Sweeney on a scale of 1-5 (1 being poor and 5 being great), he's basically a 3.
 

ON3M4N

Ignores/60 = Elite
Dec 13, 2015
13,130
18,157
Connecticut
If they can sign Dadonov and swing a deal for a LHD then I'd say its a solid off-season. Not a homerun, but they would have addressed the lack of 5v5 and secondary scoring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bodit9

chrisab123

Registered User
Feb 9, 2013
2,285
1,776
This isn't accurate, at least over his career. Over his last three seasons with Minnesota, he averaged 0.84 points per game and had an 82-game scoring pace of 23 goals. Not a big goal scorer, he's basically equal to Krejci in that regard, except he shoots more. The offense dried up when he got to Nashville, but they were a mess the last 18 months, and clearly the fit was bad. I'm not sure if the fit here would be any good, but I think he'd probably come in the cheapest of the top wing options (Hoffman, Dadonov, Toffoli, and Granlund), and all of them have questions, so might as well just go after the cheapest one.

Makes sense. I made the assumption based on his raw numbers. I'd still strongly prefer Hoffman and or Dadonov though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad