Siamese Dream
Registered User
Horrible for George but Perez getting his first win in possibly his last season was the 2nd most favourable result
Quite the contrary; Mercedes was stupid for letting Russell race Bottas, when he was guaranteed to get disqualified after the race for driving with Bottas' tyres..Merc completely f***s over Russell, then lets Bottas defend despite russells pace advantage.
Merc pitwall ruined what should have been the best race of the season. It's clear George > Valterri, but you know Merc would never admit that despite this race being proof.
f*** YOU MERCEDES.
Quite the contrary; Mercedes was stupid for letting Russell race Bottas, when he was guaranteed to get disqualified after the race for driving with Bottas' tyres..
Important to remember that Sainz could have been up fighting for a win if he hadn't been pitted too late under the VSC.
Important to remember that Sainz could have been up fighting for a win if he hadn't been pitted too late under the VSC.
Also, Mercedes had "individual" warts for both drivers (Bottas had a 27 second pit stop; mixed tyres for Russell) when they didn't even have to stop in first place.
Hopefully Russell drives for Merc next week (not wishing HAM any Covid-related harm of course).
No we won't. Here is what is going to happen;
Bottas will start off strong with Russell behind. About 3 laps in Max will start to get frustrated about being behind Russell and try some stupid overtake, spins, causes damage and finished around 5th or 6th. Around lap 10, Bottas will drive past the spot of the aforementioned contact and somehow find the only piece of carbon from it and get a puncture. On his ensuing pit stop, there will be some problem and he will come out in 10th. Russell at this point, leading the race, will come up on a back marker, and being overzealous and not used to backmarkers, will do something stupid resulting in a spin/off/damage, dropping him down the order. Leclerc, driving a safe race, thinks he's got it in the bag, until a car with power, probably Perez, passes him with 5 laps left for the win. Perez 1st, Riccardo 2nd, Leclerc 3rd.
You know, Ferrari's failure of a year might've meant that we've gotten pretty stale at the front but it has also meant that the midfield fight has been even crazier than before. We've now had 13 different drivers on the podium. That would've been crazy to think of just last year. Kvyat at 14th is the highest guy in the standings without a podium.
Quite the contrary; Mercedes was stupid for letting Russell race Bottas, when he was guaranteed to get disqualified after the race for driving with Bottas' tyres..
In a race situation, running the wrong set has resulted in a DSQ in the past. This is yet another case of F1 stewards going "all teams are equal, but some are more equal than others". I'm fine with the decision, as long as they keep the same line going forward.Guaranteed? Everyone was saying at the time that he should be okay and won't get a penalty as he was called right back in.
I was fired up when I last commented. I'm more calm now but it's still a total screw job by the team. Not intentional but bad time for a lack of focus/critical thinking.
Have to think the gravel probably looks more similar to tarmac with artificial lights on.Going back to lap 1, did Max not know there was gravel? Certainly looked like it with how fast he tried to go. He probably should've known though considering he has crashed there before. Can't really blame him though, just thought that was funny. If Max took it slower he probably gets hit by Checo or Charles so there's like a 5% chance he was escaping that one.
Going back to lap 1, did Max not know there was gravel? Certainly looked like it with how fast he tried to go. He probably should've known though considering he has crashed there before. Can't really blame him though, just thought that was funny. If Max took it slower he probably gets hit by Checo or Charles so there's like a 5% chance he was escaping that one.
In a race situation, running the wrong set has resulted in a DSQ in the past. This is yet another case of F1 stewards going "all teams are equal, but some are more equal than others". I'm fine with the decision, as long as they keep the same line going forward.
Sure, there was mitigating factors to consider in (Russell stopping again after one lap, Mercedes as a team getting screwed because Bottas suffered too, and Russell's puncture towards the end), but idk if I would've opened this can of worms. Next time this happens, the team affected is going to cite case Russell and say it was confusion/honest mistake. The question is, do the same rules apply then, or does that driver get DSQ'd? You never know with F1 stewards.
Have to think the gravel probably looks more similar to tarmac with artificial lights on.
Might not be a buyout. Could just be a straight swap with Mercedes picking up the difference. Bottas being a #1 on Williams would probably help them a ton more than having Russell and Latifi trying to develop a car.