Ok and you don't bring up Ribeiro example....all you trying to do is to say that I compare Gretzky to Hughes and you too smart to know that it is not the case at all.
But you know what I still think that in 78.... if I would told you that Gretzky would become better than Lafleur..you would not have believed me because you are stuck with the size thing..
Don't worry you are not alone..you know why....believe me or not...I was in the stands at the old forum in 1978 when I saw this beauty on ice....Wayne Gretzky at 16 in the world junior.
I was 10 years old.... and when it was clear even for me at 10... that we had in front of us a generational player....
Then me and my father....all we heard from people around us..was.......wait and see when he will face the big serge savard , Robinson etc. In the NHL......little ***** Gretzky will be destroyed and will not be able to make his fancy moves.
Yes ...even the great Gretzky was facing that... you know some people who does not know what iq is....and still think that size and even speed is the most important things in hockey...
And you are more interested in labeling me than trying to read and understand what I said. What you say is 100% conjecture and interpretation. I always believed that Gretzky would dominate because he had an incredible edge over everybody else. I like Gaudreau, liked Martin-St-Louis tremendously: I'm not against small players. I'm small <---
When it comes to evaluating hockey talent and
to rank it I have to go with the evidence of what I see.
I don't dislike Jack Hughes, I just don't have him evaluated at the same place you do. I don't see any comparison with Gretzky. Jack is not in the same tier of talent. Jack is smaller. Jack does not have a large edge over NHL players. Size is not everything, size is much less important than 10 or 20 years ago, but it still matters: it will always matter. Denying it is like denying physics.
I also think that the 2015-2020 period will remembered in 30 years as the transition years to a fast game (it used to be that size was the first factor, now it is speed). Because it is the beginning of the transition, smaller players who are fast have had a small window of opportunity they won't have in 5-10 years when the bigger guys will have accelerated themselves. We've seen the same thing happen in every sport.
Would you draft a 6'0'' goalie in 2018? It's clear that 6'3"+ goalies have won and it's never going back. Soon they will be 6'5''+ in average. Yet in the 80's and 90's the same arguments were made about speed with the small goalies. You know what, the big guys are as fast as the small guys now, and they are bigger.