Raab
Registered User
- Oct 6, 2007
- 18,085
- 2,777
You wanted Sergachev a few years back. Besides Caufield, give me you top 3 realistic picks for Oilers at 8.
Boldy, Broberg, Dach in that order honorable mention to Krebs.
You wanted Sergachev a few years back. Besides Caufield, give me you top 3 realistic picks for Oilers at 8.
It dosen’t matter if it’s offseason or not, it’s one of te toughest injuries to come back from and probably THEY toughest to get back to 100%. Hell I’d argue Karlsson was never the same after his injury.Why? It's an offseason injury, one that a young player should recover fully from, and he won't miss any key development time. I don't see this affecting his draft stock much.
Right you are. Brain fart on my part or... Brain Poo if you will.It was actually Marc Antoine Pouliot
It dosen’t matter if it’s offseason or not, it’s one of te toughest injuries to come back from and probably THEY toughest to get back to 100%. Hell I’d argue Karlsson was never the same after his injury.
Patrick Kane and Sam Gagner are still 3+ inches taller than Caufield and Yamamoto, theres small and then there’s being a smurf.Yamamoto might not even turn out. You don’t pass on Patrick Kane because you drafted Sam Gagner.
The bolded is just flat out incorrect, he’s going to need to work on both those things, when your Caufields size you can’t just be a + skater, you need to be notches above everyone else in terms of foot speed when your playing pro players with longer strides, and his passing is not solid, to play on that team and only put up 28 assists is subpar.McDraiCaufield would be the best top line in the league. They would probably be good for ~2 goals a game. We have other prospects coming up, like Benson, Maksimov, McLeod, the fact is that you don't draft players based on 'having too much of that type'. Not only are they completely different players, but in a couple years our team could look completely different. Couldn't we use a RHS pure sniper, who is also a great skater and solid passer. So what if he's small? determined by size.
Boldy, Broberg, Dach in that order honorable mention to Krebs.
If you want a defenseman, trade the assets and move up to 4 to get Byram. A second rounder, a decent prospect, and 8 should get it done.
Unless the Avs don’t want to trade it...
Last year there was a strange trend to pick small skilled players. This caused some drastic drops that were very unusual.
One constant, even/especially last year, is to value centers with size and/or talent.
I believe this draft will play out more traditionally compared to last. Maybe one surprise pick in the top 8 with basically every center getting snatched up asap.
I hope there are a few surprises so the Oilers can pick the center they want but think the good ones will be gone.
The bolded is just flat out incorrect, he’s going to need to work on both those things, when your Caufields size you can’t just be a + skater, you need to be notches above everyone else in terms of foot speed when your playing pro players with longer strides
and his passing is not solid, to play on that team and only put up 28 assists is subpar.
Debrincat was definitely I worse skater for sure but he also had vision that kept defenders guessing and made him self a force on the forcheck based off a strong work ethic.DeBrincat was not a + skater either, he's doing fine. I was really skeptical about DeBrincat because of his size and lack of skating but he's proving me wrong. I don't see why Caufield can't be as successful.
Here we go again...Caufield scored 72 goals. The next closest to him on his team had 34 goals. What do you want him to do? Refuse to score so he can even out his assist totals?
Leading up to the draft, I've essentially ignored D in the first round with the assumption that we'd likely end up with a forward.
I've seen Nurse and Broberg compared before, but how similar are they really? If I'm selecting a D, I'd much prefer a guy who can make a great first pass vs the guy who can rush the puck out. How good is Broberg's passing? Offensively, I prefer the guy who has good vision and offensive awareness in the O-zone vs a guy with a really good point shot. How good is Broberg at jumping up into the play? He's definitely got the skating for it.
From what I recall at the U18's, Broberg looked like a solid prospect. Like a good bet to become a top-4 D who is good in his own zone, skates the puck out of danger.
Debrincat was definitely I worse skater for sure but he also had vision that kept defenders guessing and made him self a force on the forcheck based off a strong work ethic.
We both know 72 goals isn’t going to transfer to the NHL and I don’t think he has playmaking ability to fall back on, which makes him only a threat to shoot which will be far easily defended by players. He’s just not versatile enough to be a top 20 player for me.
Boldy, Broberg, Dach in that order honorable mention to Krebs.
I’ll think it’ll translate but not at the rate he’s been scoring in the USDP. He’s not keeping a 30% shooting percentage going into the NHL.He has the best shot I've seen out of any prospect apart from Laine in recent years. It's incredibly accurate and he can literally score from anywhere. What makes you think that that ability won't translate? Any time he gets the puck in a remotely dangerous scoring position he'll be a threat to score. That elite level of goal-scoring is not something that can just be easily stopped or shut down.
I don't think his playmaking is bad, he's just primarily a shooter, but he can dish the puck too. I've seen more playmaking ability from him than from Podkolzin as an example. But either way his job will be to score goals in the NHL, and with how smart he is and how good he is at finding the open spaces, I don't see how that part of his game won't translate.
I agree with the first two, but I'd take York over Broberg if it comes down to it. He brings an element our defense really lacks.I’d take Dach, Boldy, Broberg in that order.
I agree those are the 3 guys that should be our targets, I’d be very happy with any of those 3. I’m reasonably sure at least two of those three should be available.
I agree with the first two, but I'd take York over Broberg if it comes down to it. He brings an element our defense really lacks.
I'd probably just go forward at 8. There's guaranteed to be at least one of Turcotte, Dach, Zegras, Boldy, or Caufield available at 8, assuming Hughes, Kakko, and Byram are all picked before us. I don't feel comfortable getting either one of York/Broberg at 8th, so unless we trade down, a forward is likely my pick.I’ve been on the York train for a long time, if we like him I’d like to see us trade back for him. I think that Broberg is more of an all situations higher upside pick though, but I have liked York for a long time just not sure about at 8.
In fact, I’d be completely good with moving back a few places to grab some additional picks. There is very little separating a cluster of players after Hughes/Kakko that falling back to the middle of the 1st would be fine by me if the deal was right.
Very entertaining highlight package. Newhook's shot is a lot better than I thought it was. Kid can snipe.