ETA 2000 Fan
Registered User
- Apr 16, 2015
- 583
- 185
Graeme Clarke scores 50 goals and still ends up with a single digit +/-.
Connor Brown one year scored 25 and was a -72 (not sure if that's a record or not).
Graeme Clarke scores 50 goals and still ends up with a single digit +/-.
Speaking of NB, will they have the lowest average attendance for the fourth year in a row?
I can't really get a feel for London yet. Their D is supppper raw but they have the picks to change that pretty fast, but will they? I think
London has a veteran forward group and a talented inexperienced Defence. This disconnect needs fixed. Depending on how it goes early I wouldn’t be shocked to see them ship out veteran forwards and load up with “age aligned” forwards. Then look towards next year or even the year after? HOWEVER cleaning house or selling off in London generally means a finish of Mid Pack not Bottom Pack. All depends on how the younger “D” develop as I believe they are committed to keeping and playing the youngsters. Going to be fun to see where it all goes.
Yeah they have way too much talent to “sell off”
Could they make minor tweaks and be a 40-45 team? Yes. But they also have the assets to load up a bit and compete for a title given the open field of the West. If I were London, would I really fear Flint, Kitchener, or Saginaw? Because there really are no other teams who are in position to make a run. Maybe SSM but even they would need MAJOR buys to get to that point.
London could and likely will self evaluate themselves and the league (like they always do). And I think by mid season they will be in position to add 2/3 bigger names to make a good run at it
London could and likely will self evaluate themselves and the league (like they always do). And I think by mid season they will be in position to add 2/3 bigger names to make a good run at it
4)Mason McTavish, who was refusing to report then all of a sudden, curiously signed. Did he actually have a change of heart and wants to be a Pete? Or was he promised a January trade to a team of his choosing? It's possible. It's also possible that there may already be a deal in the works with another team. The Kerby Rychel trade from Mississauga to Windsor comes to mind here. This is pure speculation on my part. But in an all in season, he would be quite a bargaining chip to move for veteran help. My thinking is that getting him to sign, with a pre-approved trade to a team of his choice for veteran help, would make sense from a Peterboro point of view. If they were to trade him during the defective player period, all they would get back is picks. Sure, those would be good assets to use at the deadline, but if they already have a veteran player targeted, and from a team that McTavish wants to play for, then it would all make sense for him to report to Peterboro and be a "good soldier" until the January trade.
Prediction: The latter is true. There will be a trade where McTavish is the centrepiece going to a team, that he will report to, for one or more veteran players.
1. There are no two part trades but that won't stop 95% of members of this board speculating on them (is Tomasino a General yet? No?).
2. Only one '03 born first rounder is traded at the deadline, it's not Mason McTavish. This won't stop fans from wishcasting their OA with 30 games left in the OHL into fantastical and implausible trades for these first rounders.
3. Cameron Butler, who is basically being ignored on NHL Draft Lists right now is selected in the first round in 2020.
I'm just saying compare the level of talk about two part trades on these boards to the number that have actually ever happened and the ratio is way way way out of whack.The 2 part Tomasino thing wasn't made up out of the blue by fans like you're making it out to be, it came directly from multiple OHLInsiders tweets (along with Allan Etmanski). Now maybe some people don't believe what OHL insiders says, but I know you're not one of those people because you specifically had quoted him literally yesterday in the Petes thread about another rumour he tweeted out. So either you think there's credibility to what he tweets out or you don't. But you can't run with it when it's about Dellandrea and then **** on fans because they ran with another tweet he put out about Tomasino....
Speaking of NB, will they have the lowest average attendance for the fourth year in a row?
2200 in Missy for the home opener (actual ppl in the building???)
2900 in NBay for home opener
3000 in Erie
The Soo.Ryan Merkley gets traded to London and then tries out for Team Canada and gets cut then demands a trade out of London and ends up in ?
Peterboro Petes may be the team in the OHL to watch this year for various reasons.
1)Ryan Merkley's on the block. The fact that he's going to be hard to move to get value for, is something to keep an eye on.
Prediction: The Petes are reduced to having to move him for maybe a third round pick plus a small handful of conditional picks. Conditions would be a combination of performance/if he's even with the team after December 31st. That sort of deal would work for the destination team. If he doesn't work out, release him before the new year and it only costs you a third rounder. Worth a shot.
2)SDA is rumoured to have asked for a trade. Just a rumor, but it's also worth paying attention to.
Prediction: Just a rumour. He stays put and is a part of Peterboro's all in season.
3)They have an over age spot to fill. As they are going all in this year, surely they would like to bring in a higher end overage.
Prediction: they deal for a high-end OA forward.
4)Mason McTavish, who was refusing to report then all of a sudden, curiously signed. Did he actually have a change of heart and wants to be a Pete? Or was he promised a January trade to a team of his choosing? It's possible. It's also possible that there may already be a deal in the works with another team. The Kerby Rychel trade from Mississauga to Windsor comes to mind here. This is pure speculation on my part. But in an all in season, he would be quite a bargaining chip to move for veteran help. My thinking is that getting him to sign, with a pre-approved trade to a team of his choice for veteran help, would make sense from a Peterboro point of view. If they were to trade him during the defective player period, all they would get back is picks. Sure, those would be good assets to use at the deadline, but if they already have a veteran player targeted, and from a team that McTavish wants to play for, then it would all make sense for him to report to Peterboro and be a "good soldier" until the January trade.
Prediction: The latter is true. There will be a trade where McTavish is the centrepiece going to a team, that he will report to, for one or more veteran players.