ShelbyZ
Registered User
- Apr 8, 2015
- 3,816
- 2,578
IMO, the other thing to look at with Baertschi is that by claiming him, a team is essentially doing the Canucks a favor.
It would be one thing if Sven had just this season left and you wanted to give him a shot to see if he can stay healthy or benefit from a change of scenery. However, he's got that extra year and on a team that's loaded with bad to questionable contracts (Eriksson, Sutter, Beagle, Myers and I guess now Baertschi) continuing into next season.
If I'm interested in Baertschi, rather than put in a waiver claim, I'd want to see if Vancouver would sweeten the pot by retaining salary, including a draft pick or taking back some bad salary of my own in a trade before just gifting them with the relief of $2.2-3.3M of cap space for next season.
It would be one thing if Sven had just this season left and you wanted to give him a shot to see if he can stay healthy or benefit from a change of scenery. However, he's got that extra year and on a team that's loaded with bad to questionable contracts (Eriksson, Sutter, Beagle, Myers and I guess now Baertschi) continuing into next season.
If I'm interested in Baertschi, rather than put in a waiver claim, I'd want to see if Vancouver would sweeten the pot by retaining salary, including a draft pick or taking back some bad salary of my own in a trade before just gifting them with the relief of $2.2-3.3M of cap space for next season.