Johnnyduke
Registered User
- Oct 30, 2007
- 22,904
- 6,886
This is hindsight is 20/20 talk.
At the time of the deal JG had played one and a half good games before being injured. I don’t believe any of the BS revisionist history coming out of CLE claiming they would have given up the farm.
I guess you could argue that they could have tried to keep JG until the FA period started this year by tagging him and dealing him, but that would have been extremely tricky with the Cap implications.
I don't think it's hindsight at all. Bill should have figured out Jimmy wasn't taking a bridge deal and that trading Brady wasn't an option (if in fact he wanted to but was told no). I'm not saying they had to get the farm from Cleveland. But they absolutely could have gotten more for Jimmy than what they got. Whether from Cleveland or whoever else.