Yea man, I think Andersson caps off as an excellent 3rd liner, and maybe a below average 2nd liner in his prime. At best. I think Keane has top 4 upside, and even though I’m not sure if he will get there, I like his chances of being a middle pairing d-man over Andersson’s chances of being a 2nd liner. In regards to Lundkvist, I just love the kid. I don’t see him as anything less than a solid top 4 d-man. He won’t be great, and he’s kind of a “safe” prospect (like Andersson), but again, I like his chances more. Lundkvist is a better skater and passer, which are 2 of the top 3 things I look for in a prospect. The other being hockey IQ, which I believe is about even for both. In my opinion, Andersson’s hockey sense is a little overrated, and his skating will always keep him from reaching the next level.