2018-19 Utica Comets, Pt. III

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pastor Of Muppetz

Registered User
Oct 1, 2017
26,160
16,018
... aaaand 4-2 over Belleville on Saturday. I normally have a life, I swear.

Average performance in a pretty even game. Team is really being carried by their PP right now - thought it would be affected by the loss of Juolevi but just keeps rolling.

- Demko was rock solid, especially when the team lagged in the 2nd period. Moved well and looked calm and controlled. Especially liked how confident he looked stopping a breakaway from ex-Comet Labate. Both goals to beat him were deflections with really no chance.

- Carcone with his 3rd straight multi-point game. Again not perfect and had a couple poor forced passes but it seems like the entire offense is running through him right now. Generated several quality chances for linemates.

- MacEwen had quite a bit of jump but lots of slop to his game. Needs to be more direct and effecient. Did make a terrific bang-bang pass to Kero for the 2-0 goal.

- Gaunce deserved the EN goal after getting no luck on about a dozen chances. Worked tirelessly and looks to have returned to Utica with a great attitude.

- Dahlen ... more of the same. Scored a goal on a bit of a janky one-timer on the PP and had a few other good moments on the PP, where he does look good. At ES, couldn't find him without a program. Everything is on the perimeter - sideboards or shots from the tops of the circles. Does not go to tough areas of the ice, at all. 1 ES goal and 5 ES points in 20 games. Can see why Ottawa sold high on him.

- rough game for Jasek. Poor puck management, never generated anything.

- Palmu a healthy scratch, Gadjovich invisible again.

- Cam Darcy isn't a prospect but has really solidified the team at C since returning from injury. Scored in each of the two weekend games and did yeoman work on the PK.

- Blujus-Sautner were better. Blujus skated much better than in the Rochester game and was probably the team's best defender again. Sautner competes hard but simply cannot generate controlled zone exits.

- Brisebois better also. Skated better and joined the play well a couple times. Also knocked a Senator player flying after he poked Demko which is the most physicality I've ever seen from him.

- McEneny is piling up PP points right now and looking good there but the pairing with Graham was an adventure all night.

- how is Christian Wolanin not up on Ottawa's awful blueline? Impressive player, skated miles and passed the puck crisply all night.
Does Demko look that far off from NHL ready?
 

Megaterio Llamas

el rey del mambo
Oct 29, 2011
11,229
5,946
North Shore
It's disappointing to hear about Gadjovich. Hopefully he improves. Looking at the draft, I'm not sure if there are any guys drafted after him that sticks out as reasonable choices at the time that look to be better picks today.

Anyone know when Kole Lind would return to the lineup?
Gadjovich seems in awe of his surroundings or something, like he's not ready for this and he knows it. Of course he is slower than molasses, which is something we kind of knew about him but the timidity is somewhat surprising. It looks like he obviously should have been sent back to Owen Sound this year but his second round draft status got in the way. He is failing utterly to keep his chin above water in Utica and I don't think the experience of having gone through this will help him in the future.
 

UticaHockey

Registered User
Feb 27, 2013
3,428
2,321
Utica, NY
Gadjovich seems in awe of his surroundings or something, like he's not ready for this and he knows it. Of course he is slower than molasses, which is something we kind of knew about him but the timidity is somewhat surprising. It looks like he obviously should have been sent back to Owen Sound this year but his second round draft status got in the way. He is failing utterly to keep his chin above water in Utica and I don't think the experience of having gone through this will help him in the future.
There was no point in sending Gadjovich back to juniors to play against smaller teenagers. He should be in the ECHL at Kalamazoo playing against older players until his game develops to the point where he doesn't look lost in the AHL. I know the optics of sending a second round pick to the ECHL in his first pro season don't look good but it is another developmental tool at the Canucks disposal.
 

UticaHockey

Registered User
Feb 27, 2013
3,428
2,321
Utica, NY
Going back and watching the weekend's games. Will start with the 5-4 win over Rochester from Friday.

- Dahlen ... ugh. Hands and talent are there, skating ability and compete aren't. Funny how he and Juolevi are a throwback to the long blown-up stereotypes of Scandinavian players from 30 years ago. Floats in and out of the game, occasionally does the fancy edgework stuff his dad did (on the perimeter leading to nothing) disappears for ages, gets a look at goal ... and the release on his shot is slooooow. Looks better on the PP where his hands and ability to give/receive a pass are more on display and his lack of footspeed less of a factor.
Glad to know that someone else is seeing the same thing in Dahlen that I see. If a Utica fan questions Dahlen's heart on some message boards it doesn't go over very well. There are a large number of Canucks fans that want this kid in the NHL now if not sooner.
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
53,611
84,139
Vancouver, BC
Does Demko look that far off from NHL ready?

He looks to me like an NHL goalie who could and should be in the NHL right now.

Glad to know that someone else is seeing the same thing in Dahlen that I see. If a Utica fan questions Dahlen's heart on some message boards it doesn't go over very well. There are a large number of Canucks fans that want this kid in the NHL now if not sooner.

On the PP, he could probably be useful on the 2nd unit for the NHL team right now.

At ES, not a chance. Guy is just the definition of an perimeter player. And he's slow. He will be a bust unless he finds something else in himself and in his game and is hungry for the puck and hungry to make plays in hard areas.

Has been a huge disappointment to me considering his age and 3 years experience playing against men.
 

Bad Goalie

Registered User
Jan 2, 2014
20,091
8,776
Glad to know that someone else is seeing the same thing in Dahlen that I see. If a Utica fan questions Dahlen's heart on some message boards it doesn't go over very well. There are a large number of Canucks fans that want this kid in the NHL now if not sooner.

Personally I would like to see Dahlen and Juolevi in Vancouver and in the lineup. I want to see if they play the same way up there. If they do, the hype will fade fast. If they don't the poster who said he thinks they will just click a switch and prove themselves NHL quality will be spot on. I don't think it will turn out that way. I think we see what they are. There is no switch to click.

The best thing for them is to see the physicality at the next level is even greater than it is here. Therefore, playing on the perimeter to avoid it like Dahlen does here won't help his game up there any better. IF these guys have just been treading water to avoid trouble (I don't see that), that would say a lot about their lack of integrity.

While we are at it Carcone and MacEwen should get the same look and that means in the lineup on a regular shift, not in the press box a la Chatfield and Brisebois.

I want to see how Carcone's game of going it alone until he is out of options before he passes goes over with Travis as well as his line mates. If he is going to be a passer, like he should, will we also see his difficulty in passing accuracy since he does it so little that he's not very good at it?

Also want to see if Mac can carry the puck vs NHL D-men and have any more success against them than he does against the AHL defenders. Will we see him stumble around off balance or will he get leaning or reaching out too far ahead of his skates and end up off balance from these efforts as well? Those issues usually see him falling to the ice or using half the width of the rink to right himself and get going again. Will passes bounce off his stick like they do so often here? Will he keep trying the same futile toe drag and get stripped time after time? Will his half boards pass be to a Canuck or an opponent? That's assuming he wins the half boards battle in the first place. When/if he fixes these issues, I can see NHL potential, but not the way he plays now.

Can't take anything away from his efforts, but all that ramming around while missing the check he had set up, or the stick he pokes or swings at, or the puck he is going after that ends up just out of his reach has zero to do with how he scores goals. His goals don't come off the rush. Most are dirty goals in the low slot, the crease, or off the edge of the net and are often on rebounds from someone else's shot. Carrying the puck is not his forte. He will almost always lose it when going it that way. He needs to go the net and dirty places while competent line mates carry the puck and get it to him in his scoring areas. He can make short, accurate, crisp passes as we saw on his pass to Kero from behind the net for a goal Saturday night. That is how he will be most valuable. That's where he can use his size and strength to the best of his abilities.

He hasn't connected on most of those one time or quick release plays because he is too busy trying to be a puck carrying, power forward, carrying it to the net himself with little positive results. After practice or at the end of pregame warmups you can watch him release Boucher type one timers on passes sent across the ice to him. In the games, he seems to be unable to take that shot, often flat out whiffing at the puck. He needs to practice this play much more since he has received those passes in games and his goal numbers would skyrocket if he managed to get the shots off, and then also of importance, on net.

Vancouver should take these guys up one at a time and give them a regular shift for at least one whole game and see what they've got. If the promise is high give 'em another game or 2. If they are really good, send someone else down. It's not like there are not guys in the lineup who couldn't be replaced by a competent player. If their game is not ready, they will see it, the coaches will see it, and the fan base will see it. Send them back to Utica with a clear picture of what they have to get better at. Thinking they are ready, but are just waiting for room is not a good way to develop as a prospect.
 

Askel

By the way Benning should be fired.
Apr 19, 2004
2,386
774
Malmö/Vancouver
There was no point in sending Gadjovich back to juniors to play against smaller teenagers. He should be in the ECHL at Kalamazoo playing against older players until his game develops to the point where he doesn't look lost in the AHL. I know the optics of sending a second round pick to the ECHL in his first pro season don't look good but it is another developmental tool at the Canucks disposal.
The weird part is that Dahlen wasn't a perimeter player at all in Sweden. Last year he was dominating Allsvenskan ofensevly, these players usually steps pretty seamlessly into the AHL. Weird that he doesn't look better, I still have some hope for him and hope that he can find last years level of play.
 

Bad Goalie

Registered User
Jan 2, 2014
20,091
8,776
With the return of Archibald the Comets have 14 healthy forwards and 7 D-men.

Juolevi and Chatfield are injured D-men, which means Graham is top 6 and Dirk is the only reserve. that doesn't make for a very strong D-corps.

MacMaster, Woods, Lind, Hamilton, and Arseneau are injured forwards. Prior to Archi there was only one extra forward and Cull swapped that extra spot between Gadjovich, Palmu, and Kile, 2 played and one sat and he rotated them in and out. Now Archi goes in and 2 of those 3 will sit.

Last line groupings were:
Dahlen/Darcy/Bancks
Gaunce/Kero/Jasek
Carcone/Cameranesi/MacEwen
Gadjovich/Gardiner/Kile

Archi goes where?
Is this the best arrangement to extract the most from the Comets' talent?

We know he only has 4 centers unless he moves Gaunce to the middle which is what I would do.

Kero
Gaunce
Darcy
Cameranesi

Dahlen, Carcone, and Archi are LWs
MacEwen, Jasek, and Bancks are RWs

You then have Palmu, Gadjovich, Gardiner, and Kile to select 2 wings from.
Gardiner is a RW and Palmu is a RW/LW who has shown no better spark on either side, so leave him as the other RW.
Kile and Gadjovich are LWs.

Mix and match until 2 prove to be the best choice.

MacMaster on the left and Lind on the right makes all of these guys reserves. If Beagle makes Gaudette expendable, then Cameranesi is a reserve until Woods and Hamilton both return.

If both Woods and Hamilton become healthy I see Cull moving Gaunce back out on the wing and Woods and Hamitlton will become the other 2 centers.

So, an almost healthy healthy Vancouver would see the return of Boeser and Beagle. If Boeser plays tonight, the Canucks are a player over the limit. Beagle is said to be early December. It's November 27th. No further injuries (and that would be a miracle) means 2 over the limit soon. Either one D and 1 Forward or 2 Forwards.

Frickin' Baertschi would make 3 over and would mean 3 have to go.

Eventually, Sutter would mean 4!

I am hoping for 2 and recognize 4 would be a pipe dream.

I'm not going to construct the lines. Cull always leaves me disappointed. However, the top 9 will use the 6 wings I listed above and Gaunce, Kero, Darcy, and Cameranesi will be in the top 12. I hope and pray that Gaunce is a center over Gardiner who has contributed absolutely nothing in the middle.

It's official that Boeser plays tonight and that puts the Canucks another player over the legal limit of 23. That should mean someone has to be sent down. Hoping for Boucher while Gagner stays in Vancouver. A Gagner demotion would mean nobody for the Comets. He would simply return to Toronto.
 
Last edited:

Bad Goalie

Registered User
Jan 2, 2014
20,091
8,776
The weird part is that Dahlen wasn't a perimeter player at all in Sweden. Last year he was dominating Allsvenskan ofensevly, these players usually steps pretty seamlessly into the AHL. Weird that he doesn't look better, I still have some hope for him and hope that he can find last years level of play.

Your hope isn't yours alone. There are at least 4,000 people here in Utica that have the same hope.
 

Bad Goalie

Registered User
Jan 2, 2014
20,091
8,776
Boucher has been sent down. Not sure he makes it to Bingo tomorrow, but the knowledge itself is a plus to the Comets.
 

UticaHockey

Registered User
Feb 27, 2013
3,428
2,321
Utica, NY
With the return of Archibald the Comets have 14 healthy forwards and 7 D-men.

Juolevi and Chatfield are injured D-men, which means Graham is top 6 and Dirk is the only reserve. that doesn't make for a very strong D-corps.

MacMaster, Woods, Lind, Hamilton, and Arseneau are injured forwards. Prior to Archi there was only one extra forward and Cull swapped that extra spot between Gadjovich, Palmu, and Kile, 2 played and one sat and he rotated them in and out. Now Archi goes in and 2 of those 3 will sit.

Last line groupings were:
Dahlen/Darcy/Bancks
Gaunce/Kero/Jasek
Carcone/Cameranesi/MacEwen
Gadjovich/Gardiner/Kile

Archi goes where?
Is this the best arrangement to extract the most from the Comets' talent?

We know he only has 4 centers unless he moves Gaunce to the middle which is what I would do.

Kero
Gaunce
Darcy
Cameranesi

Dahlen, Carcone, and Archi are LWs
MacEwen, Jasek, and Bancks are RWs

You then have Palmu, Gadjovich, Gardiner, and Kile to select 2 wings from.
Gardiner is a RW and Palmu is a RW/LW who has shown no better spark on either side, so leave him as the other RW.
Kile and Gadjovich are LWs.

Mix and match until 2 prove to be the best choice.

MacMaster on the left and Lind on the right makes all of these guys reserves. If Beagle makes Gaudette expendable, then Cameranesi is a reserve until Woods and Hamilton both return.

If both Woods and Hamilton become healthy I see Cull moving Gaunce back out on the wing and Woods and Hamitlton will become the other 2 centers.

So, an almost healthy healthy Vancouver would see the return of Boeser and Beagle. If Boeser plays tonight, the Canucks are a player over the limit. Beagle is said to be early December. It's November 27th. No further injuries (and that would be a miracle) means 2 over the limit soon. Either one D and 1 Forward or 2 Forwards.

Frickin' Baertschi would make 3 over and would mean 3 have to go.

Eventually, Sutter would mean 4!

I am hoping for 2 and recognize 4 would be a pipe dream.

I'm not going to construct the lines. Cull always leaves me disappointed. However, the top 9 will use the 6 wings I listed above and Gaunce, Kero, Darcy, and Cameranesi will be in the top 12. I hope and pray that Gaunce is a center over Gardiner who has contributed absolutely nothing in the middle.

It's official that Boeser plays tonight and that puts the Canucks another player over the legal limit of 23. That should mean someone has to be sent down. Hoping for Boucher while Gagner stays in Vancouver. A Gagner demotion would mean nobody for the Comets. He would simply return to Toronto.
The latest injury update.




 

Bad Goalie

Registered User
Jan 2, 2014
20,091
8,776
The latest injury update.






So, we will soon see how close I am when Lind, MacMaster, and Woods return. Woods will go into the middle and Gardiner will come out, MacMaster and Lind will put Palmu and Gadjovich out of the lineup. The numbers should be enough to see Kile go back to ECHL Maine and Gardiner to Kalamazoo. If I were the Comets, it would be Cameranesi I'd keep around as a reserve or 4th center if Cull wants Gaunce on the wing. Let Gardiner play every day in the Zoo. If he is ever going to amount to anything, he has to play a lot of hockey. That won't happen here with healthy players.
 

Bad Goalie

Registered User
Jan 2, 2014
20,091
8,776
I knew Bancks was hurt when he didn't attend the post game autograph session. As the Captain, he has always lived up to his responsibility to the fan base.

DTD is a good thing, but Wacey was DTD weeks a go and he is still not even mentioned. I'm not Wacey's biggest fan, but he is way better than either Cameranesi or Gardiner and probably Woods as well. The key for Wacey is staying out of the box. If he can do that, there is a niche role for him on the 4th line and penalty kill. Interesting that the 2 "hungriest players" on the team can't get on the ice as 2/3 of the what they do best as 4th line checkers and PK specialists. I have been wracking my brain to find a quality 3rd piece for that line and I don't see one.
 

Bad Goalie

Registered User
Jan 2, 2014
20,091
8,776
TSN has listed his demotion to Utica as of Nov 27.

AHL.com has added Boucher to the Utica Comets as of Nov. 27.

Has Vancouver reneged on the reports they have given to the outlets?

Is Gudbranson injured therefore allowing them to keep Boucher on the roster?
 

Megaterio Llamas

el rey del mambo
Oct 29, 2011
11,229
5,946
North Shore
TSN has listed his demotion to Utica as of Nov 27.

AHL.com has added Boucher to the Utica Comets as of Nov. 27.

Has Vancouver reneged on the reports they have given to the outlets?

Is Gudbranson injured therefore allowing them to keep Boucher on the roster?
The Dhaliwal tweet I was referring to was a while ago now:



Maybe Benning is waiting for his waivers exempt window to close :sarcasm:

*Guddy was run headfirst into the boards pretty hard by Kyle Clifford Saturday vs the Kings. Didn't dress for tonight's game.
 

orcatown

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 13, 2003
10,269
7,506
Visit site
Overall reprise of weekend action and quarter pole comment on prospects:

Team defense very improved

Sautner is IMO doing very well. Little offensive production but he is controlling his end well. Lot more physical than in past seasons. I believe first call up.

Return of Blujus has stabilized things and playing well with Sautner

McEneny back to moving the puck well. Skating still needs improvement

Even Graham is contributing and showing good speed in bringing puck out of his zone.

Bad thing here is that the D. is probably looking better without Joulevi.

Darcy has made real improvements. Skating and play making way better

Gaunce is contributing with good all round play.

Carcone remains hot. Still prone to the odd overly solo efforts but I think he is better at getting back and playing more of a 2 way game. Being more reliable defensively might cut into offense.

On the first quarter prospect assessment

MacEwen - has had a good first quarter. Every chance he will lead the team in points. Has some good attributes - he is a strong skater, smart with the puck, has good hands (especially around the net) and works very hard. Has been used in all situations and is an adequate penalty killer. Downside is he isn't that good defensively 5 on 5. Also, even though he is strong skater he is far from smooth. His cross over are clunky and he gets off-balance when stopping and starting. Makes up for some of this with hustle and having good straight ahead speed (little like Gaunce). If he can work on his skating and improve balance and agility, he could be good addition to the Canucks. From what I see might end up a 4th line disruptor type who can score some.

Dahlen - so-so season. Shows good skills. Is a good passer and sees play well. This shows up when he given time like on 4 on 4 or on the power play. Yet he tends to get eliminated 5 on 5 and is not terrific in his end. If he is to make it, he has to show more high level speed and become a more dangerous offensive player. You wonder if he can be that at the next level. Is smart player and might play better with better players.

Gadjovich - season has not gone well. Has shown some improvement but still below AHL standard. Does try to get to the net (at least without the puck) and good job of screening at times. Has poor acceleration which makes him poor in transition. Surprisingly is not physical at all. Hard to see how he gets to the NHL ATM. Maybe by next season he finds ways of compensating for lack of speed and can, at least, play a positive role on the Comets

Palmu - at this point have to conclude he cannot play at this level of hockey

Joulevi - most of it has been stated already, Has some smarts on offense and can move the puck well and often hit the open man. Decent on the PP. But he must improve his skating and his physicality to be acceptable defensively. Potential of all out bust remains.

Brisebois - another with good attributes. Is a good skater and covers the ice well. Uses this to angle the play to the outside and force play into the corner. Generally has been solid defensively. Seems to have a good shot and some ability to join the play. But you often don't see much the way of results. Don't see him asserting himself on the play the way he needs to be considered ready to move up.

Jasek - some good, some bad. In a few games has exhibited superior speed and quickness in making the right play. Comes back in his end and shows he knows how to play defense. However, in many games is not enough of presence and certainly is not having a break out season. At this point, hard to identify what future he has.

Lind - got hurt and any real assessment is difficult. Was not wowing the fans when he was playing.

Demko - another player impossible to assess. Great that he is back playing and winning.

Despite all the excitement among some with our prospects, I say that base is no better than ok. See what happens as we move along.
 

UticaHockey

Registered User
Feb 27, 2013
3,428
2,321
Utica, NY
The Dhaliwal tweet I was referring to was a while ago now:



Maybe Benning is waiting for his waivers exempt window to close :sarcasm:

*Guddy was run headfirst into the boards pretty hard by Kyle Clifford Saturday vs the Kings. Didn't dress for tonight's game.

We will have to see if Boucher shows up for the Comets games this weekend (or tonight). I could see this as a paper transaction to make room for Boeser being activated and then keep Boosh in Vancouver for a few days while they determine if Gudbranson's day to day injury is bad enough to place him on IR. That would make 7D and 14F if Guddy is out and Boosh back in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tyhee

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
21,252
14,427
Glad to know that someone else is seeing the same thing in Dahlen that I see. If a Utica fan questions Dahlen's heart on some message boards it doesn't go over very well. There are a large number of Canucks fans that want this kid in the NHL now if not sooner.
You have to remember how Dahlen arrived in the Canucks prospect pool. They didn't draft him, he was acquired in a trade for Burrows.

You always hope for the best, but Jimbo's track record in acquiring 'prospects' from other NHL organization is dismal at best. There's always a reason why the NHL organization that drafted him (in this case the Sens) were willing to give him up only a year after selecting him. Maybe they saw some of the same things we're seeing in Utica?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad