Boo Boo
Registered User
- Jan 31, 2013
- 2,141
- 2,276
Point being that Cogs created plenty of chances, which in his case, was treated as a negative. Shore is benefiting from the holy trinity of HF talking points: relative youth, relative cost, and the appearance of skill, specifically playmaking (aka danglez). Does he ACTUALLY bring more in terms of results, either offensive or defensive? No. But that's the narrative because HF values youth and cap space above all, with highlight reels a close third. Maybe he'll bring more going forward...maybe. But we're not in the future yet.
Thats not true. Cogs was a great duck but successful teams need to have players up and down the line up that can create space for themselves and move the puck. Cogs is great only when our team didn't have possession and the way our star players are overpaid at this point in their careers our bottom six has to be able to help carry the play.
Shore can at least carry the puck into the offensive zone with speed.