Prongo
Beer
Whatever needs to happen needs to be huge. This team is stale and has no energy. A big shakeup to the core needs to be made. Simmonds, Voracek, and others should all be on alert.
I would put either Provorov or Ghost with Myers and trade for a veteran RHD that can skate it out of the zone and efficiently pass it out of the zone unlike Folin that can't do either. Hagg can't really either but he is fine as a 7th. No wonder really that the Hagg/Folin combo is so bad.I'm sorry, you must have me confused for some other member of the hive. I never claimed (or thought) that Sanheim's metrics didn't benefit greatly from how Hakstol utilized him. Hakstol still sucks though, because playing Hagg & MacDonald WAY MORE than Sanheim should have been and will always be a firable offense. I'm not even talking metrics, just for the sake of the future of the club!
These aren't even the pairings I want. I don't like Sanheim playing on the right and I want to balance out the ice time of the top two pairs a little better.
Provorov / Ghost (fingers crossed it works again)
Sanheim / Gudas
Hagg (for now) / Myers
Make it so!
Everybody is jumping on the Skinner bandwagon but this is only his first great season and wouldn't you know it's his contract year , i'm skeptical . Panarin would be easy winner for me .Panarin/Skinner would add such needed speed and scoring from the wing.
Everybody is jumping on the Skinner bandwagon but this is only his first great season and wouldn't you know it's his contract year , i'm skeptical . Panarin would be easy winner for me .
I’d be actively looking to trade Laughton to see if you can still leverage his former first round status. I do not like him as a player at all. One of many flawed pieces of the roster.He was decent early in the year but has been kind of invisible of late but I never really liked him as a player, he is what he is, personally I’d be happy if they traded him OR made him a mainstay on the 4th line
I can deal with Laughton on line 4, but I’d still rather see what I can get for him. I’d rather have someone even faster, better defensively, & more consistently aggressive than Laughton on the 4th line. Get what you can while people still remember he’s a former 1st rd pick. There are Phantoms I’d like better on line 4.Laughton is fine on the 4th line, whenever he gets promoted to the top 9 his flaws (lack of offensive instincts, puck handling) become evident.
Problem comes when you have to pay him $3M a year for a 4th line role - can't pay 6 bottom six guys $15-20M once we fill out the top 6 and pay our young D-men, see Toronto.
Skinner is a pretty damned good player. Scored 20+ goals in every year he's played over 70 games (except one), including multiple 30+ goal seasons. Also good two way guy. Entering his prime right now. If he is an option you go hard for him. He may not be a PPG player but a 55-65 point reliable 2-way guy is nothing to scoff at. I'd pay top dollar for that.Everybody is jumping on the Skinner bandwagon but this is only his first great season and wouldn't you know it's his contract year , i'm skeptical . Panarin would be easy winner for me .
Skinner is a pretty damned good player. Scored 20+ goals in every year he's played over 70 games (except one), including multiple 30+ goal seasons. Also good two way guy. Entering his prime right now. If he is an option you go hard for him. He may not be a PPG player but a 55-65 point reliable 2-way guy is nothing to scoff at. I'd pay top dollar for that.
I’m not sure about Stone for this team. Good player, but slow. I’m not sure this team needs to keep adding plodders.
Everybody is jumping on the Skinner bandwagon but this is only his first great season and wouldn't you know it's his contract year , i'm skeptical . Panarin would be easy winner for me .
Whatever needs to happen needs to be huge. This team is stale and has no energy. A big shakeup to the core needs to be made. Simmonds, Voracek, and others should all be on alert.
I don't think injury prone is the right word. Most of his injuries were concussions. That's just bad luck.He’s kind of injury prone no?
I find it very unlikely that Panarin will come to Philly, despite many posters treating it as a foregone conclusion that the Flyers will be able to sign him.Panarin's the best fit for this team for sure.
I agree with you on Skinner's offense -- he's one of the best goal scorers in the NHL. But I disagree with you on his two-way play. I don't think he's a good two-way player at all.Skinner is a pretty damned good player. Scored 20+ goals in every year he's played over 70 games (except one), including multiple 30+ goal seasons. Also good two way guy. Entering his prime right now. If he is an option you go hard for him. He may not be a PPG player but a 55-65 point reliable 2-way guy is nothing to scoff at. I'd pay top dollar for that.
Well it was well known that Q liked Panarin and was pissed when he was traded.I find it very unlikely that Panarin will come to Philly, despite many posters treating it as a foregone conclusion that the Flyers will be able to sign him.
Some people say, "If we get Quenneville we'll probably get Panarin, too." No one has answered my simple question of, "What makes you think Panarin loves Quenneville so much that it will dictate his choice in free agency?"
Panarin was traded by Quenneville's Blackhawks his 2nd year with the team; I haven't read anything indicating that Panarin had any kind of special bond with Quenneville; and there are rumors Panarin wants to play in a warm climate with access to beaches.
If I had to bet, Panarin signs with the Panthers, where he gets big money, no state income tax, and gets great weather, thereby maximizing his free agency.
Well it was well known that Q liked Panarin and was pissed when he was traded.
I have not seen Florida mentioned....but have seen NYR as a likely destination.
If we get Q, I do really like our chances on Panarin.
Panarin should be the number one target imo.
This team could use a guy that can shoot, but they lack another speedy play driver more than anything else imo.