Great idea. It does seem like they’ve got a clear-cut top five D in Carlson, Orlov, Niskanen, Kempny and Orpik that are all playing 18+ mins and then they’ve got a handful of very young kids in their early twenties that are rotating sheltered minutes under 14mins or so in Siegenthaler, Bowey, and Djoos. This is great depth and a good way to break these kids in. They may want a veteran option for the 2nd half push and the playoffs. Especially as injury insurance for another vet.I wonder if they'd take KConn plus something else. Just thinking in terms of dollars going out on our side, KConn is expendable.
He is what he's always been. A decent tweener prone to hot/cold streaks offensively. He's fine in a third or fourth line role. I'd resign him if he's being reasonable. Not sure I'd trade him otherwise just because he'd only bring a third or so. Too many sellers.Don’t get fooled by a hot streak. He’s invisible when he cools off and he’s more cold than hot. Sell high.
Guessing OEL's going to be out a while. I kinda hope they'd bring up Robbie Russo or Jordan Gross to give us a right-shot option.
Burakovsky would be a good add. I don’t want to ditch Panik at this point but I also have ZERO interest in re-signing Panik. If the trade was UFA for RFA, I’d be very tempted. Even if we had to add a bit. Panik+4th for Burakovsky is quite palatable to me. I’m assuming Panik is about to disappear.
is he still "owned" by us?Just in time, with all of these injuries:
https://www.tsn.ca/agent-datsyuk-could-return-to-nhl-1.1246026
Burakovsky would be a good add. I don’t want to ditch Panik at this point but I also have ZERO interest in re-signing Panik. If the trade was UFA for RFA, I’d be very tempted. Even if we had to add a bit. Panik+4th for Burakovsky is quite palatable to me. I’m assuming Panik is about to disappear.
Doesn't he have another year?Would you qualify Burakovsky at $3.25m this summer?
is he still "owned" by us?
Jesus I must be losing it as I looked him up yesterday???No, he'll be a RFA this summer.
For a year? Sure. Especially since I’m this scenario we’d get to have a look at him for a couple of months.Would you qualify Burakovsky at $3.25m this summer?
Floated Goligoski and Weal for Armia and a third. Seemed okay. Armia isn't special, but has some size and is a rightie. We shed a contract spot and salary.
I know some of you hate him, but I feel we might actually get more at the deadline were we inclined to move him.
I didn't say he was a plug. He's got skill and size. But is 25 and has never put it all together. Don't think it's going to happen. Still a good complimentary player and we can use the size. Has 12 points in 24 games. His best year to date (pace) in his fourth year. Had 29 points, 12 goals last year in 79 games. Coming off knee surgery.
Decent response from Habs fans.
We have two 3rds, but they’re both really early 3rds. Seems like a steep price.Friedman:
On Burakovsky: The Capitals have asked for a couple of mid-to-high round draft picks in exchange (seconds and thirds would be a good get) for him. That would give them more flexibility and assets to chase what they need.
Agreed. Too steep.We have two 3rds, but they’re both really early 3rds. Seems like a steep price.