Six Assets
Tim Stützle
Bleakley is 100% getting drafted. Likely before the 4th.
Tim murray tried very hard to draft him, good character player. Buffalo might take a hard look at him.
Bleakley is 100% getting drafted. Likely before the 4th.
I'm really hoping we can grab Dante Salituro with the Isles 3rd rounder. Could be a steal this draft.
Bleakley is 100% getting drafted. Likely before the 4th.
Anyone want to do a HFSens mock or is it too early for that?
Scouting Report
"He's an excellent hard-working, two-way forward with speed, quickness and smarts. He plays with drive and determination and is very tough to check. A coach can put him out in any situation and feel comfortable. He's a guy who could create offense off the fly, because with the speed he has he's very hard to defend against, so he's able to make plays. I think he could show a little bit more of a power-forward game, and I think it's in him where he can just drive to the net and go right through guys." - Dan Marr, NHL director of Central Scouting.
12. Ottawa Senators - Michael McLeod, C, Mississauga (OHL)
The creative McLeod (6-2, 188) led Mississauga in shorthanded goals (four) and was second in goals (21) and points (61). He has a fantastic work ethic that makes him tough to defend.
The Draft Analyst - March 5, 2016 - "McLeod is an exciting two-way player with leadership qualities who happens to be one of the best skaters available for the coming NHL draft. He has one-step acceleration which helps him keep defenders off balance once the puck ends up on his stick. From that point forward, it’s off to the races, as McLeod combines his speed with keen vision to not only identify others for an option or two, but create one for himself. The best word to describe McLeod’s game is rapid — everything he does is with effort and a sense of urgency. What separates McLeod from the lot of draft-eligible speedsters is that he has the size, strength and puck-control skills to go along with it. "
Damien Cox of Sportsnet - January 13, 2016 - "An explosive skater, he may take time as pro for other skills to catch up, like Mikael Boedker. He still has potential to move up."
Curtis Joe of Elite Prospects - 2015 - "Michael McLeod is a highly skilled power center that relies on nobody but himself to get the job done. His size and skating make him difficult to contain, and his competitiveness gives him an edge against other teams' best. His deft puckhandling skills and control over his speed are the defining aspects of his offensive abilities. All-in-all, a top talent that is both dynamic and hard to play against."
Future Considerations - November 2015 - "McLeod has an excellent skating stride which includes several different gears and the ability to instantly change speed to shoot through holes in the defense. He is defensibly responsible and plays the game from goal light to goal light. Has a very high compete level, plays physical and will do whatever is required to help his team. Creates plenty of chances off the rush using his speed and willingness to take the puck to the net. Strong in the faceoff circle and has some leadership qualities NHL teams will like."
If he's available, I'll be extremely surprised if the Sens pass on McLeod. Hes a textbook "Senators" kind of pick.
I personal would prefer one of Keller, Jost or Brown, but it's possible that none of those guys are available at 12, and even then I wouldn't be horribly upset if they passed on one of them for McLeod.
His skill set is brutally hard to ignore. And like Lazar, he's almost guaranteed to be a good NHLer, and that's not easy to pass up when your picking in the teens.
I still think I have Brown, Keller and Jost comfortably ahead of him in my rankings. That being said, I'm higher on him than most (on HF anyways...) and I definitely have him higher than that 2nd tier of defencemen. Would be very happy to land him, even if his upside is "only" a 2nd line center at the NHL level.
Well in Missasauga, his numbers were a bit of a red flag and most people were saying he was just snake bitten or unlucky. Seeing him in another setting I can't help but think it has more to do with him not having a mind for the offensive game and not having the ability to finish. Guys like Jost, Bellows and Keller were so far ahead of him in North Dakota. Even Mason Shaw looked miles ahead.
I don't expect McLeod to be anything more than a 3rd line center on his current trajectory. I've said it before but I fully expect Max Jones to go ahead of McLeod at this point. I like Adam Fox, Sam Girard, and even Gauthier over him based on my viewings and I think a good case can be made for guys like Kunin and Tufte among others.
Agree with most aside from Chychrun for me. I don't even want him at 12 personally, I'd rather Fabbro/Sergachev/Juolevi/Bean in terms of D. Then guys like Mcavoy/Cholowski are right there for me.
I think I'm just very low on Chychrun
Not sure why his numbers would be a concern. 21 goals and 61 points in 57 games played is excellent draft year production. As is his 3 goals and 9 points in 7 games in the playoffs.
His numbers would have definitely been a lot better if he could score on some of his chances. Kid gets set up on a regular basis and usually messes up the scoring chance because of his weak shot. I don't see a lack of hockey sense being the problem, he gets himself in good position and gets plenty of scoring chances, it's just when it comes down to his shot beating a goalie, that's where he falls short. No question it's a big concern, but I'm confident he can improve his shot to the point where it will no longer hinder his offense, and when that happens his goal scoring numbers will increase significantly.
I'd be careful making too much out of that U18 tournament. No question McLeod had a bad showing, but he was coming off a bad knee injury and wasn't skating as well as he usually does. As we have seen with Turris, sometimes coming back from a leg injury early can hamper more than just skating ability. Don't draw too many conclusions from a 7 game tourney.
In the 4 games I watched of him in the OHL this year he impressed me more than Nylander. Kid is an absolute soldier out there. Always making an impact on the ice with his great skating. Breaking up plays, throwing the body, disrupting offensive chances. Showed some pretty impressive vision/play-making and hands out there as well. People labelling him as a no talent grinder type like Lazar or Gauthier will be surprised. Kid was a top OHL draft pick for a reason. Doesn't lack talent at all.
He could very well end up a 3rd line center, but there's no question he has 2nd line potential. If McLeod is your 3rd line center, he'd be one of the best in the league in that role. Kid is a Bergeron/Toews type faceoff beast, and has the same size/speed combination as Kesler. McLeod has many attributes that have made Selke winners. While it's a stretch to think he's going to win one in the future, there's no question he'll be an excellent two-way forward for whatever team drafts him. Right now I'm hoping we end up with Brown or Jost (trading up to make it happen), but I'd be pretty happy if we sat at 12 and took McLeod.
I've never seen the kid play.....but that sounds an awful lot like Condra.
The question marks on him are hockey sense, vision, play making, shooting.
Not really similar IMO. Mcleod's speed and his motor are immediately noticeable. The question marks on him are hockey sense, vision, play making, shooting.
If a guy slated to go in the top 20 sounded like Condra, he'd be ranked below 170
If we go with McCleod, who can pretty much be seen as another "safe" pick, I will be pretty livid personally. Now granted, I don't know anywhere near as much as our scouts do...but what I do know is that our team is much more than a "safe" pick away from being a Stanley Cup contender. We need to hit a home run like we did when we went out and picked the 150 pound defenseman from Sweden...
Not really similar IMO. Mcleod's speed and his motor are immediately noticeable. The question marks on him are hockey sense, vision, play making, shooting.
But those question marks are not what the scouts have said. That is why I bolded those parts because of what I read on here about him to disprove it from the scouts themselves.
Hockey sense - smarts, can play in any situation, can create offence on the fly
Vision - has speed with keen vision, creates plenty of chances off the rush
Play Making - highly skilled, 40 assists, somebody passed to Nylander?
Points - 61 pts in 57 games, more than a PPG
Shooting - this is where he may need more work to get his shot off & with strength to make it a harder & faster shot but scouts haven't said much about his shot from all the reviews I have read.
I am not saying deficiencies ... question marks I have seen Ie In need of answers. I think if you did similar research you could extract glowing reports on many of the prospects, not just Mcleod.
I am basing this on what I have seen when I watched him ~ 5 times. and what I have read about him. I have heard that Nylander really helped him and when Nylander was absent his game went down. I never witnessed this , just read about it.
His skating and motor are terrific. His work ethic, and speed allow him to play in all situations. He has skills, but they do not match his skating. He is too fast for his hands for example. You can read more comments on the Prospects board about him. Of course you have to temper everything but you can get a sense. I think he has potential my initial comment on him when I first watched him was if his hands caught up to his feet watch out. I think you are within your rights to support him as a viable option for the Sens. He does have supporters as well. There will should be those grades out of 5 in different aspects coming out soon.
Most draft prospects IMO have some question marks on parts of their game; maybe aside from Matthews.