I think this is a stupid move by Murray to get rid of Lehner for a guy who played well for 25 games. How will this board react if Hammond isn't even in this league in 2 years and Lehner straightens himself out and becomes a solid starting goalie for another team?[/QUOTE]
it's irrelevant, Anderson is the starter, not Hammond. Nothing Hammond does has anything to do with Lehner.
I understand that and I'mall for keeping Anderson, but I'm thinking about the future when it comes to goalies.
Honestly they should have just rolled with the Anderson/Lehner combo for 2 more seasons, give O'Conner as much experience in the AHL as he needs and then evaluate how Lehner/Anderson are in 2 years. If Lehner is still struggling then look for a trade for him, bring O'Connor up and have Anderson as the back-up if the team sees him as an ineffective starting goalie at his age. That way if O'Conner struggles just put in the veteran again. The team trusts Anderson and it wouldn't be a big deal. What's the big deal in 2 more seasons? Based on what I saw in the playoffs and the Finals, I don't think this team is ready to compete for a championship. We have a lot of young players on offence and on D that need more time.
It's what I would have done but it seems like this trade with Lehner is happening