I'm leaning towards the poster boy of our favourite android, Appleyard: Juulsen.
McKenzie just said that Crouse lacks the talent of the top 10, but yet is not going to make out it of there.
I'm baffled.
McKenzie just said that Crouse lacks the talent of the top 10, but yet is not going to make out it of there.
I'm baffled.
McKenzie just said that Crouse lacks the talent of the top 10, but yet is not going to make out it of there.
I'm baffled.
Ah, the Great Crouse Debate. He's not as prolific as some of the other elitle top 10 picks but scouts still LOVE his game. I believe...
Source: Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie...he'll go between 5 and 10 and is unlikely to fall out of Top 10.
McKenzie's final draft ranking
http://www.tsn.ca/mcdavid-tops-mckenzie-s-final-draft-ranking-1.296839
Edit:
Provorov behind Zacha and Crouse is a bit surprising. Zacha at 6 is particularly surprising.
Samsonov at 19. Wow.
That's the lowest I've seen Chabot and Harkins.
McKenzie just said that Crouse lacks the talent of the top 10
Yeah he didn't say or imply that:
Source: Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie
No he didn't.
Ah, the Great Crouse Debate. He's not as prolific as some of the other elite top 10 picks but scouts still LOVE his game. I believe...
How do you guys read this?
Ah, the Great Crouse Debate. He's not as prolific as some of the other elite top 10 picks but scouts still LOVE his game. I believe...
How do you guys read this?
What did I say? Basically the same.
Not sure that I really like Meier. This isnt based on anything besides YouTube clips and articles but he just doesn't seem as appealing as some of our other choices.
Not as prolific isn't saying he doesn't have the talent, it's saying his stats aren't as gaudy.
Prolific refers to production, not talent. Zacha (42G, 37P) is also less prolific than the other elite top 10 forwards.
He said he's not as prolific as some of the other elite top 10 prospects. No where in there did he talk about skill or talent.
Also if anything he implied that Crouse is an elite prospect.