They're definitely really good. Like they can have Rykov, who is at least a capable KHL defender in some capacity, and just let him rot.Are SKA so much better than most teams that they can have two #1 goalies and not even consider trading one?
I don't understand the asset management at all.
They're definitely really good. Like they can have Rykov, who is at least a capable KHL defender in some capacity, and just let him rot.
Based on previous years they like two goalies close to splitting time and then seeing who’s hotter or rolling with the vet come playoff time. Shesty’s value can’t be too high cuz of his relative ‘inexperience’ and the fact that he’s likely leaving the league, and they seem to like having a capable vet as well so wouldn’t consider that trade either.I guess. Can't help but wonder if moving Shesty or Koskinen last year for a middle six forward or top 4 D would of been a difference maker come playoff time though.
It's just such a foreign concept to me to have two redundant assets, and not turn one of them into something that can be more useful.
Seems like poor, cocky, management imo.
But as someone who doesn't follow the KHL closely, perhaps there are factors I'm not aware of.
I'd really like to see shesty play for another team or league. He needs to play in more games and also not sure if he's a system goalie or not.
It's not a system thing, as SKA doesn't play anything unusual. They're just loaded, as they're owned by the (state-owned) gas company.I'd really like to see shesty play for another team or league. He needs to play in more games and also not sure if he's a system goalie or not.
Based on previous years they like two goalies close to splitting time and then seeing who’s hotter or rolling with the vet come playoff time. Shesty’s value can’t be too high cuz of his relative ‘inexperience’ and the fact that he’s likely leaving the league, and they seem to like having a capable vet as well so wouldn’t consider that trade either.
I remember Elliott and Halak in St. Louis a while back. Thomas and Rask I think was a thing. It was fairly common back in the 70s and the part of the 80s that I was a fan. We had some famous splits--Villemure and Giacomin, Richter and Beezer.I suppose. All of this reasoning aside though, I can't help but believe that if there was more parity in the league, this dual-goalie strategy wouldn't be as accepted. And if it wouldn't be accepted in a more competitive environment, then it's probably not an optimal method.
I'm trying to come up with some NHL parallel and the closest I can get is the years in Minnesota when Fernandez and Roloson both played lights out. Have there been any recent teams that ran two goalies by choice for most of the season?
I remember Elliott and Halak in St. Louis a while back. Thomas and Rask I think was a thing. It was fairly common back in the 70s and the part of the 80s that I was a fan. We had some famous splits--Villemure and Giacomin, Richter and Beezer.
Ah, Elliot/Halak I should of remembered too.
That's a good example; two guys who were established, but neither being the clear starter.
It isn't entirely without recent NHL precedent then, but I would still be adamantly opposed to the Rangers running two goalies if either could be converted into an impact skater.
And if I were a SKA fan, I'd be pulling hard for them to move one of those guys at some point during the season. Especially after failing to win it all last year.
But why? Only because you don't like two-goalie set up?
Yes. If you have two legit #1 goalies, the gain from that would certainly seem to be much less than if you had a legit #1, a good back up, and an added middle sixer or top 4 D. Especially in today's NHL where backups are more reliable than they've ever been.
This is a point that many don't grasp when it comes to specifically to SKA (or CSKA to certain extend) in the context of KHL. The team already carries excess of both forwards and defensemen who don't even in the regular lineup. These extras are not VHL quality, these are full fledged KHL regulars that would have prominent roles if they were a part of another KHL club.
Fair enough. If they're legit so stacked that they can't add a meaningful piece in return, then that's a different story.
Are SKA so much better than most teams that they can have two #1 goalies and not even consider trading one?
I don't understand the asset management at all.
They have 13 Ds on the ‘roster’. I don’t know all of them, but it seems like 10-11 are KHL caliber...