Rare Jewel
Patience
The point you made about point production was valid. But Gauthier and Getzlaf aren't good comparables.
What makes you say this? He's got a hell of a shot, and amazing IQ.
In his first AHL year, Lupul put up 56 points in 65 games, and this was after getting 75 games in the NHL the previous year.
I believe Leivo will eclipse those numbers this year, despite being a year younger than when Lupul did it and not having the NHL experience Lupul did.
I would take Leivo in the 1st round of 2011 if we did a re-draft.
I wasn't comparing them, height wasn't my comparison. Playing style was, any one who wasn't clueless woulda caught that one
Lupul put up over 100 points in his draft year. Also you can't expect Leivo to put up the totals that Lupul did. Those are some great numbers for a AHL rookie.
If you're comparing Leivo to lupul today there's a palying style comparison of sorts, but overall they're not similar. Lupul is a much better skater, has much better hands, and is more noticeably physical. Leivo is more of a hard working cycle player who gets shots off of the cycle (similar to Kule's 30 goal season), on top of that Leivo is actually good defensively. They both drive the net and play with "heart", but really there's a pretty massive talent disparity. You're really overrating Leivo if you're expecting him to put up more than .86 PPG in his first year of the AHL.
Which of these 30 2011 draft players would you take Leivo over? RNH, Landeskog, Huberdeau, Larsson, Strome, Zib, Schiefe, Couturier, Hamilton, Brodin, Baertschi, Beaulieu, Klefbom, Gibson, Ritchie, Jenner, Saad, Kucherov, Shaw, Murphy, Percy, Namestnikov, Armia, Cousins, Gaudreau, Palat, Pageau, Clendening, Rakell, Morrow, or Danault
Lupul imo is an ambitious projection for leivo. I think leivo can be a 50pt guy with two way abilities and great on the cycle. On a good year, he might crack 60 too.
Lupul imo is an ambitious projection for leivo. I think leivo can be a 50pt guy with two way abilities and great on the cycle. On a good year, he might crack 60 too.
Which is pretty much what Lupul has been for his career.
We probably could've NOT grossly overpaid Clarkson, with ridiculous term, and just waited a year for Leivo.
Lupul on the leafs has been a 70-80 point player. Im sure that when many are projecting him to be as good as lupul, they dont mean 50 point lupul but 70-80 point lupul.
Nonis had a great summer, but that signing is brutal. I mean if we think he is overpaid now... imagine in seven years.
Really? Cause you said "In no way are they similar", then you list off 2 similarities.
^^ Don't underrate Leivo's abilities. His hands are just as good as Lupul's. He has some slick mitts which I learned after I watched him a lot in Kitchener.
I can't believe some of the posts that I see on this website.
Lupul has then best mitts on the leafs, yes, better than Kadris.
And you think Leivo has better hands?
Leivo doesn't have Lupul's hands, but he does play a similar game. I would project him to play like Lupul before he joined the leafs.
20-30 goals 50 points
Actually, he never said that.
the thought of them even being equal is asinine.
The Frederik Bustier title of this thread is embarrassing to our prospect. It's not even accurate at all. Weird.
So pretty much Lupul up until he played with Kessel.