Kitten Mittons
Registered User
- Nov 18, 2007
- 48,903
- 80
Nah, he'll bust. Unless he hits puberty and grows some muscle. He might be another Vlasic. Sure looks like him.I hope Mueller works out as well!
Nah, he'll bust. Unless he hits puberty and grows some muscle. He might be another Vlasic. Sure looks like him.I hope Mueller works out as well!
I saw a different angle on NHL on the fly on Stuart's hit..he didn't lead with an elbow...it was high though.
Unless our coach with his Burish-mancrush has his way, Sheppard will look really good when Havlat and Torres return and he gets some stud linemates (nevertheless, his line should improve from Sheppard-Desi-McCarthy).
Too bad T-mac will never do it, but in theory:
Hertl-Thornton-Burns
Marleau-Couture-Havlat
Torres-Pavelski-Kennedy
Nieto-Sheppard-Wingels
13th forward Desjardins
14th forward Burish
Desi is doing work...hes not coming out of the line up.
Stuart's hit doesn't look that bad from this angle - http://video.tsn.ca/?dl=nhl-latest/latest/1/0/1020112/clip/369
Just making the point of how stacked the lineup is, and how, when fully healthy, Burish shouldn't be in it (and Sheppard should, in theory, end up with better linemates). Double especially (As to benching Burish) come playoff time.
To play devil's advocate, you can see issues on the goals.
Goal 1 was all Desjardins.
Goal 2 came off Boyle/Thornton's transition-creating ability; 98/100 you want Hertl hustling on the backcheck, not floating near the blueline on the off-chance that there will be a turnover.
Goal 3 was nice hands by Hertl, but generated by a fine shot from Demers; Hertl was just cleaning up the garbage in front.
Goal 4 doesn't come unless Demers makes that beautiful pass to Hertl.
To play devil's advocate, you can see issues on the goals.
Goal 1 was all Desjardins.
Goal 2 came off Boyle/Thornton's transition-creating ability; 98/100 you want Hertl hustling on the backcheck, not floating near the blueline on the off-chance that there will be a turnover.
Goal 3 was nice hands by Hertl, but generated by a fine shot from Demers; Hertl was just cleaning up the garbage in front.
Goal 4 doesn't come unless Demers makes that beautiful pass to Hertl.
To play devil's advocate, you can see issues on the goals.
Goal 1 was all Desjardins.
Goal 2 came off Boyle/Thornton's transition-creating ability; 98/100 you want Hertl hustling on the backcheck, not floating near the blueline on the off-chance that there will be a turnover.
Goal 3 was nice hands by Hertl, but generated by a fine shot from Demers; Hertl was just cleaning up the garbage in front.
Goal 4 doesn't come unless Demers makes that beautiful pass to Hertl.
To play devil's advocate, you can see issues on the goals.
Goal 1 was all Desjardins.
Goal 2 came off Boyle/Thornton's transition-creating ability; 98/100 you want Hertl hustling on the backcheck, not floating near the blueline on the off-chance that there will be a turnover.
Goal 3 was nice hands by Hertl, but generated by a fine shot from Demers; Hertl was just cleaning up the garbage in front.
Goal 4 doesn't come unless Demers makes that beautiful pass to Hertl.
To play devil's advocate, you can see issues on the goals.
Goal 1 was all Desjardins.
Goal 2 came off Boyle/Thornton's transition-creating ability; 98/100 you want Hertl hustling on the backcheck, not floating near the blueline on the off-chance that there will be a turnover.
Goal 3 was nice hands by Hertl, but generated by a fine shot from Demers; Hertl was just cleaning up the garbage in front.
Goal 4 doesn't come unless Demers makes that beautiful pass to Hertl.
To play devil's advocate, you can see issues on the goals.
Goal 1 was all Desjardins.
Goal 2 came off Boyle/Thornton's transition-creating ability; 98/100 you want Hertl hustling on the backcheck, not floating near the blueline on the off-chance that there will be a turnover.
Goal 3 was nice hands by Hertl, but generated by a fine shot from Demers; Hertl was just cleaning up the garbage in front.
Goal 4 doesn't come unless Demers makes that beautiful pass to Hertl.
TMac sounded kind of pissed in the post game when asked about the fourth goal, saying something along the lines of "Hertl is innocent out there, doesn't know anything, and doesn't know what league he's in."
I hope I just read it the wrong way because stifling a young player's creativity like that would be terrible. It's a game for crying out loud, let the 19-year-old kid have some fun.
Based on what I've seen so far, I think Havlat is out of a job. He's injured too often and overpaid. Nieto and Hertl have passed by him on the depth chart.
Vigneault is still the drama queen. Stuart did not elbow Nash in the head and he didn't leave his feet as Vigneault claimed.
I think Nash left the game because he didn't want anymore to do with the blowout. Or perhaps Vigneault kept him out because he wants to make a case to suspend Stuart as payback for the Sharks causing him to lose his job in Vancouver. Shanaban likes to suspend when a player is injured and ignore or give a fine when a player isn't injured.
You have to be ******** me. You could make an argument like this for every single goal in the NHL.
Well the question was "what did you think of Hertl's fourth goal?" or something like that and his first reply was "well it went in so it's fine" instead of giving him props or credit.In that case, I hope guys like Hertl and Yakupov never realize what league they're playing in.
But if I were to know the koala's comments better, I would assume he meant that Hertl was playing beyond what is expected of him. Just a guess.