Against the non-playoff teams in the West this year:
Ducks Opponents | | | | | | | | | |
Team | GP | W | L | OTL | Pts | . | GF | GA | GD |
Arizona | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 6 | | 17 | 25 | -8 |
LA | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 | | 22 | 25 | -3 |
SJ | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 9 | | 22 | 20 | 2 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | 24 | 10 | 11 | 3 | 23 | | 61 | 70 | -9 |
[TBODY]
[/TBODY]
Against the playoff teams in the West this year:
Ducks Opponents | | | | | | | | | |
Team | GP | W | L | OTL | Pts | . | GF | GA | GD |
Vegas | 8 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 4 | | 13 | 29 | -16 |
Colorado | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 6 | | 19 | 30 | -11 |
Minny | 8 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 4 | | 14 | 24 | -10 |
St. Louis | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 6 | | 19 | 26 | -7 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | 32 | 7 | 19 | 6 | 20 | | 65 | 109 | -44 |
[TBODY]
[/TBODY]
Against weaker teams, the Ducks were able to put up more points against them in eight fewer games than against playoff teams. Anaheim was in the positive goal differential (GD) once in all of the series. What does this mean? It means in games that were not close, they were blown out. Also, it means the Ducks were involved in a plethora of close games. Note the Ducks have 9 OTL points, which is tied for most on the West. The Ducks did this while missing their top-2 defensemen for most of the season. Lindholm played in only 18 games, or 32% of the season. Manson played in 23 games, or 41% of the season. They played together only three times this year, actually less because Manson fell during the third game.
PK importance
I tracked when Lindholm and Manson were on the ice for Power Play situations versus when they were not on the ice.
PK with and without Lindholm and Manson (Up to game 47)
Up to game 47 | | | | | |
. | Games | PPGA | TSH | PK Eff | Rank |
Total | 47 | 29 | 141 | 79.4% | 14th |
With L or M | 35 | 15 | 106 | 85.8% | |
total - w L or M | 12 | 14 | 35 | 60.0% | |
[TBODY]
[/TBODY]
Note: Game 47 was Manson's last game healthy until the last two games of the season.
As you can see, with either Lindholm or Manson, the PK is one of the tops in the league. Currently, an 85.8% PK efficiency ranks the Ducks at 3rd overall. Since over half of the Ducks were one-goal differential games, reducing that PPGA could have lead to more wins. In 29 one-goal games, the Ducks went 10-10-9.
During the season, Anaheim promoted 18-year old RHD Drysdale. He started off hot, but the league wore him down fast. Yet, he remained in our top-4 because he was better than whoever we had. At the trade deadline, the Ducks acquired 24 year old Fleury and he blossomed offensively at the conclusion of the season. Although we did ship off Hakanpaa for Fleury, the Ducks are +1 in defensive depth compared to the start of the season. This depth is important because our top-2 defenseman have been unlucky with injuries for the past two seasons. Why is this important? Here is a small sample of seven games without Lindholm or Manson on the PK.
PK without Lindholm or Manson (Games 48-54)
Ducks | | | | |
Games | PKGA | TSH | PCT | |
48 | VGK | 0 | 3 | 100% |
49 | LA | 0 | 2 | 100% |
50 | LA | 1 | 5 | 80% |
51 | LA | 0 | 1 | 100% |
52 | LA | 0 | 1 | 100% |
53 | St. L | 1 | 2 | 50% |
54 | St. L | 1 | 3 | 67% |
| | | | |
7 | Total | 3 | 17 | 82.4% |
[TBODY]
[/TBODY]
The additions of Drysdale and Fleury reveal themselves in a very encouraging way such that we can survive the loss of Manson or Lindholm on the PK. Of course, there are other factors such as Lundestrom's defense stepping up on the PK as well as the addition of Volkov.
Depth: Defense and Goalie
Currently, the Ducks have top netminders Stolarz and Dostal in their system. Ollie Eriksson Ek is developing. Stolarz might be the player that might be plucked for the Expansion draft. This leaves Dostal and OEE in our system. Dostal is putting up similar numbers to Stolarz and Dostal is only 20 years old (will turn 20 in June). Anaheim is set at goal in the NHL with Gibby. Many teams do not have a competent goalie. Although Buffalo has some talent in their system, acquiring Dostal in a deal for Eichel is very valuable as they can let Dostal continue to pile up his resume in the AHL and can ship him off to another team for even more assets. There's a possibility Stolarz isn't drafted at the XD and the Ducks netminding depth increases.
Outside of our top-5 blue liners (
Lindholm, Manson, Fowler, Fleury, and Drysdale), Anaheim has a few young defenseman developing in Benoit, Andersson, and Mahura in the AHL. There are a few older prospects in Curran, Larsson, and Guhle. In college, LaCombe and Thrun are going into their junior season. Going to college next season is Ian Moore. LaCombe might be a heavily propped up prospect to other teams as his offense is rising year after year while learning to play defense in college. His skating is amazing, which helps him to adapt faster. Jackson went from unknown high schooler to being a top defender in the Big 10 (made big 10 rookie team and big 10 first team in his sophomore year). Could a team want a potential Shea Theodore-lite?
Anaheim can afford to lose prospects in a goalie and a defense or two. If Manson and Lindholm are re-signed, then there's only one NHL blue line roster available and a 7th defenseman, which would be reserved for a low paying veteran defenseman.
...
What the Ducks are in dire need of is a strong forward who can score. Anaheim possesses high end draft picks (this year's first and second round selections), high end prospects, and about $20 mil in cap space, where several RFA's will come relatively cheap. Whether that forward comes via FA or trade, this is the year that the Ducks can vault itself into competitive play. They could go after two forwards. Conflate that with an assistant coach who can vastly improve the PP and the Ducks increase their chances of competitiveness with respect to the playoffs.
The difference between the Ducks and Kings is that the Kings were held up thise season by their big-3 veterans in Kopitar (age 33), Doughty (31), and Brown (36). Anaheim's top scorer is 22 year old Comtois. In 19 year old Zegras' recall as a center, he put up 6 points (2g, 4a) in seven games. 21 year old Lundy is establishing himself as an NHL center. Then there's the two defensemen in 18 year old Drysdale and 24 year old Fleury. What I'm saying is that the youth group is what is creating the push in Anaheim, ahead of the Kings' contingency. Adding a strong forward or two can do so much for this franchise. Acquiring a 24 year old Eichel would definitely catapult the team ahead, provided he's acquired via propspects and not one of the youths listed above. But do they need Eichel to improve? No. It's one option. The Ducks have a developing forward core that needs extra juice. Acquiring Hoffman (on a short term) + via free agency without sacrificing this year's #1 would be amazing! There should be several options, but the Ducks core looks to be solid and improving.