So, who gets traded this year? No one wants Grant this time. Hutton? Heinen? Spare parts for contending teams. Manson is injured and is harder to trade. Rowney is out so not him either. Milano hasn't done anything and is injured. Getzlaf, Backes, Fowler and Lindholm are not going anywhere and neither are Gibson or Miller. No one is going to take on Henrique's contract and I doubt Silfverberg interests anyone either at the moment. Shattenkirk or Larsson? Lol. Then there are a bunch of kids who shouldn't be traded.
Honestly, only players who could be interesting to other teams and even somewhat realistically traded are Hakanpää and Rakell. Teams would be interested in giving assets for them. Heinen and Hutton could be traded for like 4th rounders or something. Hakanpää and Rakell could get a good return at least. But, do you want to trade a defenceman who plays well with Fowler and has been a nice surprise? And do you trade away a forward who has been one of the few players who can do something with the puck? Tough choices as there are no players who could immediately replace them.
I don't know what kind of moves Bob is going to pull this season. Doesn't seem like there's much to trade.
So, who gets traded this year? No one wants Grant this time. Hutton? Heinen? Spare parts for contending teams. Manson is injured and is harder to trade. Rowney is out so not him either. Milano hasn't done anything and is injured. Getzlaf, Backes, Fowler and Lindholm are not going anywhere and neither are Gibson or Miller. No one is going to take on Henrique's contract and I doubt Silfverberg interests anyone either at the moment. Shattenkirk or Larsson? Lol. Then there are a bunch of kids who shouldn't be traded.
Honestly, only players who could be interesting to other teams and even somewhat realistically traded are Hakanpää and Rakell. Teams would be interested in giving assets for them. Heinen and Hutton could be traded for like 4th rounders or something. Hakanpää and Rakell could get a good return at least. But, do you want to trade a defenceman who plays well with Fowler and has been a nice surprise? And do you trade away a forward who has been one of the few players who can do something with the puck? Tough choices as there are no players who could immediately replace them.
I don't know what kind of moves Bob is going to pull this season. Doesn't seem like there's much to trade.
The only players I don't want to trade at this point is Lindholm, Zegras and Drysdale.
He's been a pleasant surprise but if we got value for him so be it.hopefully Hawk is in there. He’s been basically a top-4 guy at this point and progressing well.
I mean at this point it has to be at least half a dozen players that need to part ways. That includes, imo, Henrique, Hutton, Larsson, Heinen, Steel, and hate to say it, since he is a fan favorite, Silfverberg.
I really would like to keep Hakanpaa and Rakell around unless the return is really good, and I mean throw a team over a barrel good. This team needs a 1C badly.
I don't disagree with you (except maybe give Steel more time), but just 'cos Ducks need to get rid of these guys, doesn't mean they can get rid of them. Henrique and Silfverberg are difficult and they are probably offseason moves rather than trade deadline moves. Hopefully Seattle is interested in either one.
As much as we all like Hank, I don't think his value is all that high around the NHL right now. If traded, we'd be lucky to get a 6th IMO. Not saying we should deal him, just saying that if he was dealt, that's probably the maximum that we'd get.
get.
This team needs a new GM and scouting department
Don't think it has been mentioned here yet.. Friedman had this to say about Rakell on his latest 31 Thoughts podcast, about 11:20 into it, "The price of Rakell, I'm not so sure Toronto is going to be in on that. I could be wrong again, I know I'm putting myself into position to get clobbered if certain things come true, I've heard the price on Rakell is going to be, like maybe Anaheim thinks Toronto doesn't have what it wants."
He goes on to say at 14:50, "I'm not so sure Anaheim is going to deal Rakell [...] I'm not convinced they're going to do it."
Seattle would hire him in a heartbeat and Seattle would laugh hard at the Ducks.So you mean get rid of Martin Madden?
So you mean get rid of Martin Madden?
I don't want to get rid of him, but if the choice was promote him to GM or let him go I'd have to take the latter. The new GM needs to be someone from outside the organization with a fresh perspective.
So you mean get rid of Martin Madden?
Not sure why we wouldn’t even bother to give madden a shot at gm for a year or 2. These upcoming drafts are supposed to be really good. Who cares if we’re poop for 2 more years, realistically we weren’t gonna do anything for the next 2 years anyways might as well see what madden is made of in that time period. If he doesn’t work out we can also get someone newYou can promote Madden to be GM which would be fine, but this organization needs some fresh insight from the outside.
This team needs a whole different dynamic.
So you mean get rid of Martin Madden?