He made contact in the blue paint without making a play on the puck.I think it was, but it may be the first time that I agree with Toronto. I never know what to expect. The puck was not covered by body, glove or pad.
Yeah think you’re right.No. The puck was in plain sight on top of the leg pad, not under it. Too many goals get disallowed in the NHL.
That’s not how it works. Incidental contact is allowed if the puck is loose in the crease.He hit Rinne'd leg which impaired his ability to make a save on it regardless if it was on top of his pad. Contact with goalie in the crease. Plain and simple.
You could make contact with the goalie, yes.So if the puck is on top of the goalies head can he be rammed into?
Nothing says it has to be covered, it just says you can't impede them from making a save.I think it was, but it may be the first time that I agree with Toronto. I never know what to expect. The puck was not covered by body, glove or pad.
So if the puck is on top of the goalies head can he be rammed into?
Rinne had no clue where the puck was.Nothing says it has to be covered, it just says you can't impede them from making a save.
Its not that simple, if you just happen to touch him that can be done, but it doesn't matter if its loose or not you can't just ram a goalie.Yeah think you’re right.
That’s not how it works. Incidental contact is allowed if the puck is loose in the crease.
You could make contact with the goalie, yes.
No, that is a head shot. No goal and maybe 2 minutes.
That’s not how it works. Incidental contact is allowed if the puck is loose in the crease
What's the exact issue with the current rule?I don't know whether that should've been a goal or not, but the NHL really needs to do a sit down and review the rule and how to interpret it after the season. No one knows what's a good goal and what's interference anymore.
That doesn't matter either lolRinne had no clue where the puck was.
Well obviously you couldn’t ram the goalie. But incidental contact, even inside the crease initiated by the skater, is allowed if the puck is ruled to be loose. At least that’s my understanding of the rules.Its not that simple, if you just happen to touch him that can be done, but it doesn't matter if its loose or not you can't just ram a goalie.
I hate both teams but man that was a joke. He skated into the goalie while in the crease pushing his leg and then his body had to go back so no way he could make that save. If he doesn't get pushed he gets his glove on that easily. NHL wants close games obviously. If that were the Blues 100% thats no goal. Their consistency on goalie interference is atrocious...worse than NFL catch. Stupid
If the puck is loose, the player can attempt to play the puck...even if he gets in the goalies way/impedes his ability to make a save.Not when he is attempting to make a save. You can't impede the goalie's ability which it obviously did.
nothing gives me nightmares quite like colorado pulling their goalie.