Speculation: Trade deadline acquisitions (All rumors/proposals/etc)

Status
Not open for further replies.

vegasvic

Registered User
Jan 10, 2010
130
0
Seems that any non-core roster player that is moved will likely be as the "you must take this guy too" part of a package deal with picks and prospects. Yes I'm looking at you Sharp, Bickell, Crawford, Rozi, Oduya, Carcillo, Richards, Smith, Kruger, Shaw, and Versteeg
 

GGGHawks18

Registered User
Dec 16, 2011
748
5
Chris Kuc ‏@ChrisKuc 4m4 minutes ago
Source says #Blackhawks are looking at Hurricanes' Andrej Sekera and Flames' Curtis Glencross as possible trade targets.

What would we give up for these guys?
 

Taze em

Registered User
Apr 20, 2012
8,339
620
Chris Kuc ‏@ChrisKuc 4m4 minutes ago
Source says #Blackhawks are looking at Hurricanes' Andrej Sekera and Flames' Curtis Glencross as possible trade targets.

What would we give up for these guys?

I don't know but if Stan pulls off a Sekera deal we are set. He's very good as a top 4 D.
 

Crazy_Ike

Cookin' with fire.
Mar 29, 2005
9,081
0
Chris Kuc ‏@ChrisKuc 4m4 minutes ago
Source says #Blackhawks are looking at Hurricanes' Andrej Sekera and Flames' Curtis Glencross as possible trade targets.

What would we give up for these guys?

This doesn't make sense to me. The Flames aren't sellers. They SHOULD be but they won't see it that way.
 

Taze em

Registered User
Apr 20, 2012
8,339
620
This doesn't make sense to me. The Flames aren't sellers. They SHOULD be but they won't see it that way.

As luck would have it he is unhappy with his role and has demanded a trade. Very good luck for buyers. He's a good player. Hell, since they are in the playoff picture and have a big man fetish maybe you can drop Bickell on Calgary to make room for Glencross+Sekera. Just spitballing here.
 

ToewsForDays

Registered User
Feb 8, 2015
1,098
0
Chris Kuc ‏@ChrisKuc 4m4 minutes ago
Source says #Blackhawks are looking at Hurricanes' Andrej Sekera and Flames' Curtis Glencross as possible trade targets.

What would we give up for these guys?

Nice. These guys are perfect for this year since they are both UFA's
 

Taze em

Registered User
Apr 20, 2012
8,339
620
Bickell+3rd for Glencross. Burke traded a 3rd for Bollig. They love big power forward types in Calgary. Playoff pedigree/experience plays for a young developing team like Calgary.

Then: Sekera for 2nd+McNeill
 

bwana63

carter blanche
Jul 11, 2014
5,390
4,328
Chi western burbs
Bickell+3rd for Glencross. Burke traded a 3rd for Bollig. They love big power forward types in Calgary. Playoff pedigree/experience plays for a young developing team like Calgary.

Then: Sekera for 2nd+McNeill

I don't think that'll do it for Sekera. From the Hawks' perpective, I'd do that all day, every day.
 

Blackhawkswincup

RIP Fugu
Jun 24, 2007
187,422
20,896
Chicagoland
No one will take the mistake that is #29 off our hands and I doubt very much Stan will actually improve roster via trading. He simply refuses to do the work expected of a real GM

Hannan + AHL forward at deadline will be his big move as the Hawks start preparing for 1st round exit. And no doubt like last year with Rundblad he will overpay for the trash he brings in
 

JaegerDice

The mark of my dignity shall scar thy DNA
Dec 26, 2014
25,203
9,456
Chris Kuc ‏@ChrisKuc 4m4 minutes ago
Source says #Blackhawks are looking at Hurricanes' Andrej Sekera and Flames' Curtis Glencross as possible trade targets.

What would we give up for these guys?

Sekera would be a dream, but I don't think there's any way Stan can outbid the other teams looking for D like Anaheim or LA.

If he pulls it off, it would be a huge help though....assuming of course, Q doesnt refuse to play him because he dislikes the way he ties his skates or some such.
 

H a w k s*

Registered User
May 18, 2012
1,128
0
No one will take the mistake that is #29 off our hands and I doubt very much Stan will actually improve roster via trading. He simply refuses to do the work expected of a real GM

Hannan + AHL forward at deadline will be his big move as the Hawks start preparing for 1st round exit. And no doubt like last year with Rundblad he will overpay for the trash he brings in

Lol, so a real GM is supposed to panic and be overly reactionary and say damn the how TE team is structure let's bring in a player who isn't very good and is terrible fit for the style of play the team plays. (Polak who you have advocated).

Good to know .
 

MurrayBannerman

I post about baseball on a hockey forum
Feb 18, 2012
34,493
659
CHI
No one will take the mistake that is #29 off our hands and I doubt very much Stan will actually improve roster via trading. He simply refuses to do the work expected of a real GM

Hannan + AHL forward at deadline will be his big move as the Hawks start preparing for 1st round exit. And no doubt like last year with Rundblad he will overpay for the trash he brings in

Did you team up with Coldy?
 

Blackhawkswincup

RIP Fugu
Jun 24, 2007
187,422
20,896
Chicagoland
Lol, so a real GM is supposed to panic and be overly reactionary and say damn the how TE team is structure let's bring in a player who isn't very good and is terrible fit for the style of play the team plays. (Polak who you have advocated).

Good to know .

No a good GM would recognize his mistakes and try to move on from them (Bickell + Rundblad) as well as try an improve roster instead of watching his most valuable trade asset fade away (Sharp)

A good GM wouldn't bring in trash like Rundblad/Erixon/Cumiskey to play on an NHL roster (Gave away a high quality asset in 2nd rounder for Rundblad as well)

If Hawks fail this year the blame is 100% on Stan and his roster management
 

JaegerDice

The mark of my dignity shall scar thy DNA
Dec 26, 2014
25,203
9,456
No a real GM would recognize his mistakes and try to move on from them (Bickell + Rundblad) as well as try an improve roster instead of watching his most valuable trade asset fade away (Sharp)

A real GM wouldn't bring in trash like Rundblad/Erixon/Cumiskey to play on an NHL roster (Gave away a high quality asset in 2nd rounder for Rundblad as well)

If Hawks fail this year the blame is 100% on Stan and his roster management

Nah, it will fall to coaching, as it should. From roster management to simple motivation, Q has failed to get the best of a roster that is still very strong on paper.

Which isn't a shock, seeing as this is the same guy that felt Michael Handzus was the best option at 2C through the playoffs, and that Bollig was an integral part of an NHL lineup.

Rozsival is simply this year's Handzus.

Hell it took him a quarter of a season to figure out that Andrew Shaw is not a 2C. And apparently it's going to take him till the end of the season (or longer) figure out he's not a 3C either.

Even when you put aside the players that are being misused, the team has a whole looks completely disinterested on more nights than not, and at some point it falls on the coach to ensure his players are ready to play every night.

Some things aren't entirely under his control of course. He can't help that Patrick Sharp has a 2% shooting percentage, and he couldn't have predicted that Oduya would fall off the map (though there's little doubt he was very much part of the push to keep Oduya over Leddy, given his deployment of Leddy in the past - quite obviously that was the wrong move and the Hawks would be far better off with Leddy, as many predicted when the decision was made).

If the Blackhawks fall well short of expectations, it will be Q on the hot seat, not Stan, and rightly so.

Hopefully next year, Stan will remove all of his favorite toys, forcing him to give talented young players a longer look than he otherwise would.
 
Last edited:

scarchelli

Registered User
Aug 19, 2014
982
0
This homestand has been a huge disappointment. It basically has showed us the hawks will lose in round 1 of the playoffs.

Also, bowman will do nothing at the deadline because he is incompetent. He thinks our roster is good to go, so he picks up guys like erixon. The hawks will lose consistently without some DRASTIC roster shakeups the next week. And people will laugh and say who cares and how they won two cups in 4 seasons, but seriously, they won in 2013, not in 2014 and thus far 2015 has been a total embarrassment.
 

H a w k s*

Registered User
May 18, 2012
1,128
0
No a good GM would recognize his mistakes and try to move on from them (Bickell + Rundblad) as well as try an improve roster instead of watching his most valuable trade asset fade away (Sharp)

A good GM wouldn't bring in trash like Rundblad/Erixon/Cumiskey to play on an NHL roster (Gave away a high quality asset in 2nd rounder for Rundblad as well)

If Hawks fail this year the blame is 100% on Stan and his roster management

So, overreactionary then.

Again, sharp's decline no one knows if it's a actual decline. I for one think it's a chemistry problem. You can't break up saad/toews/Hossa and he's never been a good off winger for Kane maybe he would be a good center with Kane but that ship has sailed long ago.

The obvious fix/best fit is playing wing in Rockford currently because our stanley cup winning coach would rather ice someone like carcillo 5 minutes a game.
 

H a w k s*

Registered User
May 18, 2012
1,128
0
Nah, it will fall to coaching, as it should. From roster management to simple motivation, Q has failed to get the best of a roster that is still very strong on paper.

Which isn't a shock, seeing as this is the same guy that felt Michael Handzus was the best option at 2C through the playoffs, and that Bollig was an integral part of an NHL lineup.

Rozsival is simply this year's Handzus.

Hell it took him a quarter of a season to figure out that Andrew Shaw is not a 2C. And apparently it's going to take him till the end of the season (or longer) figure out he's not a 3C either.

Even when you put aside the players that are being misused, the team has a whole looks completely disinterested on more nights than not, and at some point it falls on the coach to ensure his players are ready to play every night.

Some things aren't entirely under his control of course. He can't help that Patrick Sharp has a 2% shooting percentage, and he couldn't have predicted that Oduya would fall off the map (though there's little doubt he was very much part of the push to keep Oduya over Leddy, given his deployment of Leddy in the past - quite obviously that was the wrong move and the Hawks would be far better off with Leddy, as many predicted when the decision was made).

If the Blackhawks fall well short of expectations, it will be Q on the hot seat, not Stan, and rightly so.

As it should. Quenville's stewardship of the team this year is downright awful. And lol at people no crying about Leddy over oduya. How many were convinced he was problem?
 

JaegerDice

The mark of my dignity shall scar thy DNA
Dec 26, 2014
25,203
9,456
So, overreactionary then.

Again, sharp's decline no one knows if it's a actual decline. I for one think it's a chemistry problem. You can't break up saad/toews/Hossa and he's never been a good off winger for Kane maybe he would be a good center with Kane but that ship has sailed long ago.

The obvious fix/best fit is playing wing in Rockford currently because our stanley cup winning coach would rather ice someone like carcillo 5 minutes a game.

And Hartman 8 minutes a game.

Cause they bring 'that element' Q likes. :laugh:

GOTTA GET DA HITZ DOE! ENERGY! GRIT!
 

bwana63

carter blanche
Jul 11, 2014
5,390
4,328
Chi western burbs
Nah, it will fall to coaching, as it should. From roster management to simple motivation, Q has failed to get the best of a roster that is still very strong on paper.

Which isn't a shock, seeing as this is the same guy that felt Michael Handzus was the best option at 2C through the playoffs, and that Bollig was an integral part of an NHL lineup.

Rozsival is simply this year's Handzus.

Hell it took him a quarter of a season to figure out that Andrew Shaw is not a 2C. And apparently it's going to take him till the end of the season (or longer) figure out he's not a 3C either.

Even when you put aside the players that are being misused, the team has a whole looks completely disinterested on more nights than not, and at some point it falls on the coach to ensure his players are ready to play every night.

Some things aren't entirely under his control of course. He can't help that Patrick Sharp has a 2% shooting percentage, and he couldn't have predicted that Oduya would fall off the map (though there's little doubt he was very much part of the push to keep Oduya over Leddy, given his deployment of Leddy in the past - quite obviously that was the wrong move and the Hawks would be far better off with Leddy, as many predicted when the decision was made).

If the Blackhawks fall well short of expectations, it will be Q on the hot seat, not Stan, and rightly so.

Hopefully next year, Stan will remove all of his favorite toys, forcing him to give talented young players a longer look than he otherwise would.

Agreed (beyond keeping Leddy -- we couldn't afford him). After our looming flameout, Q should be on the hot seat.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad