Commander Clueless
Apathy of the Leaf
- Sep 10, 2008
- 15,557
- 3,448
All I can say in hindsight is oooooof.
Yep, people who correctly call a trade bad at the time it happens are using "hindsight".All I can say in hindsight is oooooof.
Yep, people who correctly call a trade bad at the time it happens are using "hindsight".
At the time, this deal was ok. It was a reasonably tough, defensive player, which was absolutely considered the need of the team.
However, with Tavares getting injured, our needs suddenly turned to offense. Unfortunate situation, but it was a somewhat smart deal at the time.
Obviously would have preferred an Iaffalo or similar, but clearly those types weren't available (and rightly so). So, you make the best decision available at the time.
Unfortunately this time, it failed, epically as some have noted.
**** happens!
At the time, this deal was ok. It was a reasonably tough, defensive player, which was absolutely considered the need of the team.
However, with Tavares getting injured, our needs suddenly turned to offense. Unfortunate situation, but it was a somewhat smart deal at the time.
Obviously would have preferred an Iaffalo or similar, but clearly those types weren't available (and rightly so). So, you make the best decision available at the time.
Unfortunately this time, it failed, epically as some have noted.
**** happens!
A first for a grinder seemed okay at the time?
A first for a grinder seemed okay at the time?
So where does the pick happen in the order?
or can that not be figured out currently
19 or 20?
This was already known before.Wow, Leafs are without a 1st, 3rd and 4th round pick in upcoming draft.
I didn't realize it. My bad. Can't believe Foligno got a 1st and 4th.This was already known before.