Confirmed Trade: [TOR/CBJ/SJS] N. Foligno (75% retained), S. Noesen to TOR; '21 1st and '22 4th to CBJ; '21 4th to SJ

[LEAFANFORLIFE23]

i dunno where hes getting his stats from but

Nick Foligno Hockey Stats and Profile at hockeydb.com

Folingo is +5 lol

He's either lazy or choosing to make it up which either way makes him laz yand when you do that you get shit wrong

 

[shortfuze]

i dunno where hes getting his stats from but

Nick Foligno Hockey Stats and Profile at hockeydb.com

Folingo is +5 lol

he/she didnt care about the stats. the person just wanted to show someone up.

 

[Zybalto]

Foligno/Matthews/Marner 5v5 stats:

TOI: 44:49
CF%: 56.02
SF%: 66.81
SCF%: 60.46
HDCF%: 87.09
xGF%: 69.99
GF%: 100.00

Pretty good start as a line.

 

[Pure Slaughter Value]

Foligno/Matthews/Marner 5v5 stats:

TOI: 44:49
CF%: 56.02
SF%: 66.81
SCF%: 60.46
HDCF%: 87.09
xGF%: 69.99
GF%: 100.00

Pretty good start as a line.

Curious, what were Matthews/Marner's stats before Foligno was put on their line?

 

[Zybalto]

Curious, what were Matthews/Marner's stats before Foligno was put on their line?

Matthews/Marner without Foligno

TOI: 646:42
CF%: 54.63
SF%: 55.46
SCF%: 62.72
HDCF%: 66.49
xGF%: 62.17
GF%: 63.93

 

[Zybalto]

Curious, what were Matthews/Marner's stats before Foligno was put on their line?

It's early of course but the overall jump in stats is a defensive improvement combined with more defensive deployment which is interesting (and they already had good defensive stats).

Without Foligno:

58.84% offensive zone faceoffs
xGA/60: 1.84
Shots against/60: 25.01
High Danger Chances Against/60: 7.86

With Foligno:

42.42% offensive zone faceoffs
xGA/60: 1.08
Shots against/60: 18.49
High Danger Chances Against/60: 2.35

 

[EquivalentStay]

Is that why he's -5 in his first 4 games (and yes +/- yadda, yadda, yadda).

You're embarrassing man.

 

[Monk]

Foligno's gonna force me onto the Toronto fanbus this post-season, I can feel it happening already.

 

[bleuetbio]

Foligno is a hell of + for the Leafs. Definitly a game changer move who can bring the Leafs at the upper level. That said, I consider that a dman would be the need to bring them at the higher level.

 

[sxvnert]

Foligno has been exactly as advertised.

 

[Michel Beauchamp]

He's either lazy or choosing to make it up which either way makes him laz yand when you do that you get shit wrong

You probably missed what I posted the first time I was corrected.

You're right.

I misread nhl.com.

Sorry.

But why let the truth stand in the way of a good insult, n'est-ce pas?

 

[Notsince67]

Foligno has been great. Producing at a pretty decent rate despite not having built a ton of chemistry yet. Would resign in a second if it were feasible and if he had a desire. Likeable, hard working and smart.
That said, would be surprised if he didn't re-sign with Columbus. His family is still there and the team needs him

 

[LEAFANFORLIFE23]

You probably missed what I posted the first time I was corrected.



But why let the truth stand in the way of a good insult, n'est-ce pas?

I didn't miss it, I saw it but you wouldn't have had to do it in the first place if you had done 2.5 seconds of research

 

[Michel Beauchamp]

I didn't miss it, I saw it but you wouldn't have had to do it in the first place if you had done 2.5 seconds of research

Which I did but, to repeat (as you seem to have missed the main point), I misread it...

 

[LEAFANFORLIFE23]

God I hope not. I like Foligno, he's a decent player and maybe a kind of player that we lack more of but he's not worth a 1st. Not even in a weak draft with double retention.

Singing a different tune now?

 

[Viqsi]

I didn't miss it, I saw it but you wouldn't have had to do it in the first place if you had done 2.5 seconds of research

"My righteous outrage at this horrible, egregious affront to my team's dignity was so great that even a sincere and upfront mea culpa could not possibly mollify it."

When someone sincerely owns up to an error like that, continuing to pursue it just means you're trying to take the L from them for yourself. And very probably succeeding.

 

[Michel Beauchamp]

"My righteous outrage at this horrible, egregious affront to my team's dignity was so great that even a sincere and upfront mea culpa could not possibly mollify it."

When someone sincerely owns up to an error like that, continuing to pursue it just means you're trying to take the L from them for yourself. And very probably succeeding.

If I had taken 2.5 seconds to do it, I might have been able to write something similar...

 

[Just Linda]

I gave this trade a fair chance but it just seems worse and worse every time.

 

[Tasteless Beaver]

This trade is now a fireable offence.

 

[trellaine201]

Wait don't we get our 1st back....welp ..wait we don't. RIP.

 

[34]

EPIC FAIL

 

[majormajor]

This trade is now a fireable offence.

I'm not averse to firing Dubas but this trade doesn't seem like the particular offence I'd cite.

He traded for a player that ended up getting injured early in the playoffs. That's just bad luck.

 

[kylbaz]

At the time:
Dubas does it again!
Right now:
Dubas does it again!

Losing that pic is going to hurt lol.

 

[Canuck86]

EPIC FAIL

You nailed it!!! The supposed favourites to come out of the Canadian division....failed as per usual and blew a 3-1 series lead to a team that limped into a playoff spot. What is all the onTerrible media and fans going to do now...WHINE and complain I guess!

I am so happy about this, f*** the Laffs!!

 

[2020 Cup Champions]

Honestly, I didn't get this one. Foligno just acted like a psycho in the series against us last year.