Van Jack you begin by saying - I'm not buying the fact that the Comets were physically abused by other teams and were injured as a result....besides, with the veteran rule in the AHL no team can afford to retain a veteran enforcer for 'protection'. Comets got beat by the Marlies in the playoffs, and I can't think of a single 'tough guy' on that team.
Not buying it????
Megna gets driven head first into the boards by Aaltonen and was out most of the season. No response from the Comets.
MacEwen gets elbowed to the head, which Canuck Army described as massive open ice hit, by Hershey's Colby Williams and is out with a concussion during the latter part of the season. Molino tried to response and was beaten up.
McEneny gets taken out very hard by Laval tough guy Deslauriers. (see video below). No response
Evan McEneny undergoes knee surgery – expected to be out 6 months
Archibald driven face first into the boards on a dirty check by Charlotte Checkers tough guy Guy Didier and needed facial surgery. No response
Chatfield gets hit from behind in the back twice in the first period and is out of the game. Comes back after a week or so and gets immediately nailed in the back and is out again. No response in either case.
Molino is deliberately kneed in the groin by Jamie McBain and is out couple of months. No response.
Could go on here but to say the Comets weren't abused and injured is mindless. This was especially true in the first half of the season when the line up was truly decimated. After they got Comrie and Arsenault the situation improved some but by that time, key players were our for the season, others out for extended periods and/or playing hurt the rest of the year. There is no way this was a safe environment for the younger players on the team.
Then you say that no AHL team can afford an enforcer. Just flat out ridiculous comment
Look at the Comets own division
Syracuse has Gallant (strictly a goon), Walcott (secondary good) and Cernak on defense. Pluasthey have toughness, like Erne and Dumont, throughout the line up. Tampa Bay makes damn sure their youngster like Peca are protected.
Belleville had former Bruins enforcer Tyler Randell (might have been the toughest guy in the League) and others like Blunden.
Rochester has, among others, goon Dalton Smith. Below you can see him wiping out Utica's only toughness at the beginning of the season in Brenden Woods. (and Woods was never the same the rest of the season)
Laval was loaded with toughness. Had McCarron, Gregiore,Deslauriers, and out and out goon David Broll. I mean the only toughness the Comets had was Arsenault and you can see Broll rag doll him here.
Dalton Smith vs Brendan Woods Nov 1, 2017
Bingington had Thomson (9 fights last year) and Brandon Baddock (also 9 fights). Can see here Baddock manhandling, again, the only legit toughness on the Comets last season in Arsenault.
http://www.hockeyfights.com/fights/140350 with plenty of toughness with most players being able to take care of themselves.
And Toronto. You say you can't think of a single 'tough guy' on their team. Well what about Richard Clune who has been playing the enforcer role for years at the AHL and NHL level. Do you think he was on the team for his finesse around the goal? Also Toronto had a big team of players, like Greening, who could look after themselves.
I'm not saying that toughness is the "end all, be all" but to say that no one could retain a veteran tough guys or enforcers is patently wrong and an indication you haven't got a clue what you're talking about. And this shows that parent teams are concerned about the ability of their young players to have a safe environment in which they can develop their skills. And so should the Canucks. You want the younger, smaller players to know that if they are run, others will step in for them and back them. Not to understand this is not to understand hockey.
You say you agree Utica is thin at center and has been for years......but one or both of Gaunce and Motte could end up in Utica next fall and both can play center. They just have to beat the bushes for a veteran center with a scoring touch....problem is most of those guys have taken their careers to Europe where they can earn a lot more money. I'd still like to see them try MacEwan in the middle, if his skating improves.
Guys that took their careers to Europe like Zalewski (was totally banged up and concussed and useless by the end of last year) , Friesen (going nowhere - 3 goals in 76 games for the Wolves last year - and not even a part of the Canucks) and, I guess you include the completely done Pelletier, would have been of less help to the Comets than many of the PTOs brought in this season. It isn't like Canuck management got torpedoed by a sudden movement of decent centers to Europe. It was that they planned so poorly to acquire adequate centers for their farm club. Suggesting that player going to Europe was the problem is scratching around for excuses.
Also relying on Gaunce and Motte to get cut and go to Utica is not the type of planning needed. What if they don't get cut? What if injuries quickly have them recalled to Vancouver. This team needs to get legit center help for Utica and not rely on some patchwork hopes that this or that might happen.
You say but "pathetic nature of the Canucks management in terms of their primary farm team" is criticism completely over the top imo. Canucks have an exciting group of prospects ready to join their ranks in Utica. And you'd never convince me that when it comes to their AHL farm teams, the Canucks are any worse than most other NHL teams, many of whom don't see their AHL team as much of a development tool at all.
You simply change the topic here. The post about a year end review of what the Canucks actually did for Utica last year (like in the word review). You want to say well we shouldn't criticize b/c we have "exciting group of prospects" coming in. Saying what might happen in the future does not deal what actually did happen last year. And it's speculation as to what these prospects will do next year. A couple of years ago Utica was apparently getting a dynamite player in Hunter Shinklaruk. And Virtanen was coming in to tear up the League. Why don't we wait and see how these players turn out before congratulating Canuck management for a job well done.
Also you comment that many of the NHL teams don't see their farm teams as any "developmental tool at all". You must realize, upon reflection, this is ludicrous. What teams are you talking about? I see no evidence of that. Instead, I see other teams just as involved as the Canucks, if not more so, with their farm teams. Using the metric below, Utica is mid pack. Also. as it points out, the situation is far from ideal with the Canucks.
An age-based look at how NHL teams use their AHL affiliates mid pack .
Then go on to say "I mean look at Edmonton (Bakersfield); Calgary (Stockton); Montreal (Laval) and Ottawa (Belleville) and what their rosters look like...surely you're not suggesting the Canucks/Comets are in 'worse shape' than those teams.
Cherry picking some of worst rosters in the AHL here. These are all non-playoff teams. But even here their rosters have as many upper end prospects as the Canucks. In Andersson and Kylinton, Stockton has much better potential NHL defensemen then Utica did. Also Foo and Maniapane are better prospects than any of of the long term younger forwards Utica had last year. (maybe someone like Dahlen or Jaasek turns out better but we are far from knowing that). Also, Laval has Scherbak, Audette, McCarron, Rychel, Juulsen. That's probably better than the youngsters Utica had last year (again taking out speculation about players coming in late in the year). Belleville had Chalpik, Paul, Chabot (outstanding prospect)and Jaros. Far as Bakersfield goes, yeah they are really hurting for prospects - probably the worst in the AHL. So I guess, Utica might look decent in comparison to them but really so what.
Outside of this many AHL team have great prospects. And if you want to look at the upper level prospects, that actually played in the League last year for any length of time, you should look at some of the following sites
http://www.hockeyfights.com/forums/f44/ahl-announces-2017-18-all-rookie-team-222470/
AHL Notebook: Five players helping their NHL hopes
Prospect Ramblings – AHL rookie all-stars, OHL award nominees, OHL action, Pinho – April 5 2018
Only Utica prospects that would come close to being mentioned is Demko . Really the team did not have top prospects playing in Utica last year outside of Demko. To think otherwise is clearly rose-colored thinking. They may have had some other upper level prospects playing elsewhere, but not in Utica. As to the future, we'll see.
Overall, your post, seems ill-informed to me and attempts to promote the idea that the Canucks have stocked Utica with good prospects. I don't see how you can make that case in terms of last year. Time to get excited is when we see these prospects actually becoming bona-vide stars at the AHL level as Demko did.
Not buying it????
Megna gets driven head first into the boards by Aaltonen and was out most of the season. No response from the Comets.
MacEwen gets elbowed to the head, which Canuck Army described as massive open ice hit, by Hershey's Colby Williams and is out with a concussion during the latter part of the season. Molino tried to response and was beaten up.
McEneny gets taken out very hard by Laval tough guy Deslauriers. (see video below). No response
Evan McEneny undergoes knee surgery – expected to be out 6 months
Archibald driven face first into the boards on a dirty check by Charlotte Checkers tough guy Guy Didier and needed facial surgery. No response
Chatfield gets hit from behind in the back twice in the first period and is out of the game. Comes back after a week or so and gets immediately nailed in the back and is out again. No response in either case.
Molino is deliberately kneed in the groin by Jamie McBain and is out couple of months. No response.
Could go on here but to say the Comets weren't abused and injured is mindless. This was especially true in the first half of the season when the line up was truly decimated. After they got Comrie and Arsenault the situation improved some but by that time, key players were our for the season, others out for extended periods and/or playing hurt the rest of the year. There is no way this was a safe environment for the younger players on the team.
Then you say that no AHL team can afford an enforcer. Just flat out ridiculous comment
Look at the Comets own division
Syracuse has Gallant (strictly a goon), Walcott (secondary good) and Cernak on defense. Pluasthey have toughness, like Erne and Dumont, throughout the line up. Tampa Bay makes damn sure their youngster like Peca are protected.
Belleville had former Bruins enforcer Tyler Randell (might have been the toughest guy in the League) and others like Blunden.
Rochester has, among others, goon Dalton Smith. Below you can see him wiping out Utica's only toughness at the beginning of the season in Brenden Woods. (and Woods was never the same the rest of the season)
Laval was loaded with toughness. Had McCarron, Gregiore,Deslauriers, and out and out goon David Broll. I mean the only toughness the Comets had was Arsenault and you can see Broll rag doll him here.
Dalton Smith vs Brendan Woods Nov 1, 2017
Bingington had Thomson (9 fights last year) and Brandon Baddock (also 9 fights). Can see here Baddock manhandling, again, the only legit toughness on the Comets last season in Arsenault.
http://www.hockeyfights.com/fights/140350 with plenty of toughness with most players being able to take care of themselves.
And Toronto. You say you can't think of a single 'tough guy' on their team. Well what about Richard Clune who has been playing the enforcer role for years at the AHL and NHL level. Do you think he was on the team for his finesse around the goal? Also Toronto had a big team of players, like Greening, who could look after themselves.
I'm not saying that toughness is the "end all, be all" but to say that no one could retain a veteran tough guys or enforcers is patently wrong and an indication you haven't got a clue what you're talking about. And this shows that parent teams are concerned about the ability of their young players to have a safe environment in which they can develop their skills. And so should the Canucks. You want the younger, smaller players to know that if they are run, others will step in for them and back them. Not to understand this is not to understand hockey.
You say you agree Utica is thin at center and has been for years......but one or both of Gaunce and Motte could end up in Utica next fall and both can play center. They just have to beat the bushes for a veteran center with a scoring touch....problem is most of those guys have taken their careers to Europe where they can earn a lot more money. I'd still like to see them try MacEwan in the middle, if his skating improves.
Guys that took their careers to Europe like Zalewski (was totally banged up and concussed and useless by the end of last year) , Friesen (going nowhere - 3 goals in 76 games for the Wolves last year - and not even a part of the Canucks) and, I guess you include the completely done Pelletier, would have been of less help to the Comets than many of the PTOs brought in this season. It isn't like Canuck management got torpedoed by a sudden movement of decent centers to Europe. It was that they planned so poorly to acquire adequate centers for their farm club. Suggesting that player going to Europe was the problem is scratching around for excuses.
Also relying on Gaunce and Motte to get cut and go to Utica is not the type of planning needed. What if they don't get cut? What if injuries quickly have them recalled to Vancouver. This team needs to get legit center help for Utica and not rely on some patchwork hopes that this or that might happen.
You say but "pathetic nature of the Canucks management in terms of their primary farm team" is criticism completely over the top imo. Canucks have an exciting group of prospects ready to join their ranks in Utica. And you'd never convince me that when it comes to their AHL farm teams, the Canucks are any worse than most other NHL teams, many of whom don't see their AHL team as much of a development tool at all.
You simply change the topic here. The post about a year end review of what the Canucks actually did for Utica last year (like in the word review). You want to say well we shouldn't criticize b/c we have "exciting group of prospects" coming in. Saying what might happen in the future does not deal what actually did happen last year. And it's speculation as to what these prospects will do next year. A couple of years ago Utica was apparently getting a dynamite player in Hunter Shinklaruk. And Virtanen was coming in to tear up the League. Why don't we wait and see how these players turn out before congratulating Canuck management for a job well done.
Also you comment that many of the NHL teams don't see their farm teams as any "developmental tool at all". You must realize, upon reflection, this is ludicrous. What teams are you talking about? I see no evidence of that. Instead, I see other teams just as involved as the Canucks, if not more so, with their farm teams. Using the metric below, Utica is mid pack. Also. as it points out, the situation is far from ideal with the Canucks.
An age-based look at how NHL teams use their AHL affiliates mid pack .
Then go on to say "I mean look at Edmonton (Bakersfield); Calgary (Stockton); Montreal (Laval) and Ottawa (Belleville) and what their rosters look like...surely you're not suggesting the Canucks/Comets are in 'worse shape' than those teams.
Cherry picking some of worst rosters in the AHL here. These are all non-playoff teams. But even here their rosters have as many upper end prospects as the Canucks. In Andersson and Kylinton, Stockton has much better potential NHL defensemen then Utica did. Also Foo and Maniapane are better prospects than any of of the long term younger forwards Utica had last year. (maybe someone like Dahlen or Jaasek turns out better but we are far from knowing that). Also, Laval has Scherbak, Audette, McCarron, Rychel, Juulsen. That's probably better than the youngsters Utica had last year (again taking out speculation about players coming in late in the year). Belleville had Chalpik, Paul, Chabot (outstanding prospect)and Jaros. Far as Bakersfield goes, yeah they are really hurting for prospects - probably the worst in the AHL. So I guess, Utica might look decent in comparison to them but really so what.
Outside of this many AHL team have great prospects. And if you want to look at the upper level prospects, that actually played in the League last year for any length of time, you should look at some of the following sites
http://www.hockeyfights.com/forums/f44/ahl-announces-2017-18-all-rookie-team-222470/
AHL Notebook: Five players helping their NHL hopes
Prospect Ramblings – AHL rookie all-stars, OHL award nominees, OHL action, Pinho – April 5 2018
Only Utica prospects that would come close to being mentioned is Demko . Really the team did not have top prospects playing in Utica last year outside of Demko. To think otherwise is clearly rose-colored thinking. They may have had some other upper level prospects playing elsewhere, but not in Utica. As to the future, we'll see.
Overall, your post, seems ill-informed to me and attempts to promote the idea that the Canucks have stocked Utica with good prospects. I don't see how you can make that case in terms of last year. Time to get excited is when we see these prospects actually becoming bona-vide stars at the AHL level as Demko did.
Last edited: