Crunchrulz
Registered User
Rather than focus on what one contract does or does not do, take a look at the whole picture. Each team is required to have a minimum number of contracts at or under the Cap. Those organizations that tie a significant amount of their cap space into a handful of contracts must be able to accept the harsh reality that they will have to fill out the rest of the roster with players who are either in their entry level deals or cast offs from other organizations for one reason or another. In addition, when contracts come due, the organizations need to look at what is best for the organization to remain successful. If that means letting a fan favorite or a key piece of the past success go, then it has to happen if the two sides cannot agree on a "happy medium".While taking advantage of Cap Friendly's contract comparable tool, i decided to see if i could find some similar contracts signed in the 6.5-8m range for 34 year olds of Stamkos-esque career in GP and Points.
Vincent Lecavalier 33yo (PHI 2013)- 5 year 4.5m AAV 7% Cap hit
Nicklas Backstrom 32yo (WSH 2020)- 5 year 9.2m AAV 11.29% Cap hit
Henrik Sedin 33yo (VAN 2014)- 4 year 7m AAV 10.89% Cap hit
Ryan O'Reilly 32yo (NSH 2023)- 4 year 4.5m AAV 5.39% Cap hit
Jason Spezza 32yo (DAL 2015)- 4 year 7.5m AAV 10.87% Cap hit
So roughly looking at between 7%-10% (6.125m AAV to 8.75m AAV) Cap hit for 4-5 years.
The days of the Lightning being able to fill the roster with skilled players at good contracts are over. We mortgaged that future to get where we have been the last five seasons. There is not another organization in the league that would not have done the same thing, if they had had the ability to do so. Any organization or fan that tells you otherwise is a liar.