Does the new regime really go right into a rebuild with those unlovable deals and long term forwards though? Rebuildig is a last resort in real life.
I mean do they really have long term forwards? They really only have Eklund/Bordeleau who are close to ready. Only guys who are on the books in 3 years are Hertl, Couture, Sturm, EK, Vlasic, Ferraro, Benning. That’s 3 forwards and 4 D.
EK and Ferraro are in long term plans. Vlasic is whatever. Scratch him. Benning can be waived. We really only have Laroque, Merkley, Kniazev, and Hatakka on defense for prospects. Laroque I love and think he will be a top 4 D. The other three look closer to bottom pairing.
At forward, Sturm can be waived or scratched or whatever. Doesn’t really matter. Hertl is damn good. Couture is good enough to be behind Hertl. Other than Bordeleau and Bystedt, most of our forward prospects that actually matter aren’t C. They talked about moving Eklund to center but even if he does move to C it’s a long play there like it was with Hertl.
TLDR version: Sharks contract situation isn’t good don’t get me wrong but it’s no where near as bad as people say. The defense has a few long term contracts but we don’t have the prospects to make that matter. The forwards only have 3 long term contracts and they all play the position weakest in the pool. A rebuild isn’t the right word although it’s the one I used. It’s more of a retool.