GDT: Season opener: Ducks vs Coyotes - Thu 7 PM PT

Status
Not open for further replies.

duxfan1101

Registered User
Sep 20, 2014
11,587
17,670
California
Winnik hasn't signed with anyone and is coming off a pretty solid season so you have to question what he is asking for. Do you really want to pay him $2M just because we have some injuries early in the season? If his asking price is a million or less, I agree with you. I just have a hard time believing he wouldn't have been signed already if that were the case
He literally just signed with Minnesota for 660K
 
  • Like
Reactions: AngelDuck

Nithoniniel

Registered User
Sep 7, 2012
20,913
16,749
Skövde, Sweden
Missed that...Yeah Murray kind of looks dumb then
You're not the only ones. Plenty of teams with questionable depth and playoff aspirations that could have and should have reached out to Winnik. He's nothing special, but he's a solid depth guy at even strength and one of the better PK forwards in the league. It shouldn't be so hard for him to get a contract.
 

bsu

"I have no idea what I am doing" -Pat VerBleak
Sep 27, 2017
28,539
29,291
Ducks forward lines look like this at practice today per Mike Coppinger.
Ritchie-Getzlaf-Perry
Cogliano-Rakell-Silfverberg
Boll-Vermette-Kase
Shaw-Rasmussen-Wagner
 

duxfan1101

Registered User
Sep 20, 2014
11,587
17,670
California
How in the world does Boll get that spot

EDIT: I guess RC wanted to keep that 4th line together, but why not Grant
 

91Fedorov

John (Gibson) 3:16
Dec 30, 2013
1,229
727
You're not the only ones. Plenty of teams with questionable depth and playoff aspirations that could have and should have reached out to Winnik. He's nothing special, but he's a solid depth guy at even strength and one of the better PK forwards in the league. It shouldn't be so hard for him to get a contract.

I've always wondered about this. Winnik has only signed with a team he has already played for once. Every other time the team decided to move on from him. It makes me wonder if he has some baggage that is not public knowledge. I've always wondered if him being as involved as he is with the player association is part of it. I wonder if it's like constantly being watched and scrutinized by a labor lawyer. It could possibly be a thorn in a GM's side.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nithoniniel

Ducks in a row

Go Ducks Quack Quack
Dec 17, 2013
18,010
4,368
U.S.A.
From The Hockey News:
At 5-18-0, the Ducks have the worst all-time record in NHL season openers – and it's not even close. (Carolina, at 8-20-9, is second-worst.) Anaheim lost seven straight from 1993 to 1999, which is tied for the league's longest all-time losing streak in season openers, and they've dropped four in a row since 2013, which is tied for for the league's longest active losing streak in season openers.

This makes me so sad. Now lets take a look at things closer.

1993-94 lost at home 7-2 against Detroit
1994-95 lost 2-1 in Edmonton
1995-96 lost 4-3 in Winnipeg
1996-97 lost 4-1 in Toronto
1997-98 lost 3-2 against Canucks in Tokyo
1998-99 lost 1-0 in Washington
1999-00 lost 2-0 in Dallas
2000-01 won at home 3-1 against Minnesota
2001-02 lost 4-2 in Boston
2002-03 won 4-3 in St. Louis
2003-04 lost 4-1 in Dallas
2005-06 won 5-3 in Chicago
2006-07 won 4-3 at home against Los Angeles
2007-08 lost 4-1 against Los Angeles in London
2008-09 lost 4-1 in San Jose
2009-10 lost 4-1 at home against San Jose
2010-11 lost 4-0 in Detroit
2011-12 lost 4-1 against Buffalo in Helsinki
2012-13 won 7-3 in Vancouver
2013-14 lost 6-1 in Colorado
2014-15 lost 6-4 in Pittsburgh
2015-16 lost 2-0 in San Jose
2016-17 lost 4-2 in Dallas

Home record 2-2-0
Record outside Anaheim 3-16-0

I can't believe we had played so few season openers at home in Anaheim.
 

Duck Off

HF needs an App
Oct 25, 2002
20,909
5,287
Oklahoma
Winnik hasn't signed with anyone and is coming off a pretty solid season so you have to question what he is asking for. Do you really want to pay him $2M just because we have some injuries early in the season? If his asking price is a million or less, I agree with you. I just have a hard time believing he wouldn't have been signed already if that were the case

He signed today for 660k. The other day I saw an article where he was quoted as being stunned about the lack of phone calls and interest in him. Clearly our GM (and the others) weren't interested in him. I don't think he's some amazing player, but I fail to see the downside of giving this guy a deal when we look at the opening lineup. I know that when we get healthy it becomes quite a log jam, but Winnik is definitely better than Boll, Shaw, and Grant. I'd say he's better than Wagner too.
 

Nithoniniel

Registered User
Sep 7, 2012
20,913
16,749
Skövde, Sweden
I've always wondered about this. Winnik has only signed with a team he has already played for once. Every other time the team decided to move on from him. It makes me wonder if he has some baggage that is not public knowledge. I've always wondered if him being as involved as he is with the player association is part of it. I wonder if it's like constantly being watched and scrutinized by a labor lawyer. It could possibly be a thorn in a GM's side.
That's an interesting take. Hadn't thought of that.
 

Paul4587

Registered User
Jan 26, 2006
31,163
13,179
I've always wondered about this. Winnik has only signed with a team he has already played for once. Every other time the team decided to move on from him. It makes me wonder if he has some baggage that is not public knowledge. I've always wondered if him being as involved as he is with the player association is part of it. I wonder if it's like constantly being watched and scrutinized by a labor lawyer. It could possibly be a thorn in a GM's side.

I think the PA thing does play into it. I remember back when Ron Hainsey was actually good he really struggled to get a contract after the 2012 lockout and he was one of the most outspoken guys in the PA during the lockout. Media were saying at the time that owners were saying he wouldn't get another contract in the NHL.
 

91Fedorov

John (Gibson) 3:16
Dec 30, 2013
1,229
727
Makes sense that a player that can't even play on the 4th line regularly, plays on the 3rd line.

When I saw it, I wondered if Vermette was considered our 4th line center now. His play seems to dictate it. Maybe he was outplayed by Rasmussen? But Kase being on that line is confusing then.
 

mightyquack

eggplant and jade or bust
Apr 28, 2010
26,427
5,175
RC's fascination with Shaw and Boll is ridiculous. It's kind of sad even with our injuries 5 of our 6 bottom 6 forwards are 4th liners/AHL'ers, especially when we have options that would improve that bottom 6 right now.
 

Elvs

Registered User
Jul 3, 2006
12,284
4,667
Sweden
Wow, that's one slow top line ... And one bad third line ...

I'd rather have Ritchie with Vermette and Kase. Those three played some good games together last season.

Rasmussen - Getzlaf - Perry
Cogliano - Rakell - Silfverberg
Ritchie - Vermette - Kase
Shaw - Grant - Wagner
 

Sojourn

Registered User
Nov 1, 2006
50,523
9,377
So, are we not planning to have a shutdown line? All due respect to Rakell, but that's not really a strength of his.
 

gilfaizon

Registered User
Mar 28, 2012
2,322
1,486
PEI
IF Boll is on the Vermette-Kase pairing come tomorrow at puck drop i'll be sick to my stomach. Thats embarrassingly bad.
 
Aug 11, 2011
28,354
22,238
Am Yisrael Chai
I posted this Friedman interview (points 24 & 25) into another thread, but RC is apparently planning to place Rakell into Kesler's role.
Didn't say Kesler's role for Rakell, just Kesler's spot. If Rakell develops into as good a center as he is a winger, he could be an elite player. I get why they're pushing it, especially if they see that in him. But man our winger depth sucks, especially if Perry is still a pool float out there.
 

bsu

"I have no idea what I am doing" -Pat VerBleak
Sep 27, 2017
28,539
29,291
It's funny because Rakell was actually a defensive style center in junior and excelled in that area, now I want to see him no where but at the wing haha, development is crazy.
 
Aug 11, 2011
28,354
22,238
Am Yisrael Chai
Read a couple previews now where the switch from Bernier to Miller is cited like it's some huge upgrade. It's not. Bernier was good in the regular season, Miller at best will match that. Bernier-to-Miller really only matters if Gibson is hurt yet again during the playoffs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad